Not every equational class of infinitary algebras contains a simple algebra

Evelyn Nelson

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

Displaying similar documents to “Not every equational class of infinitary algebras contains a simple algebra”

Equational compactness in infinitary algebras

Bernhard Banaschewski, Evelyn Nelson (1973)

Colloquium Mathematicae

Similarity:

Relativization of cylindric algebras

Leon Henkin, Diane Resek (1975)

Fundamenta Mathematicae

Similarity:

On normal Agassiz systems of algebras

Ewa Graczyńska, Andrzej Wroński (1978)

Colloquium Mathematicum

Similarity:

Operator algebras associated with polymorphisms.

Arzumanyan, V.A. (2005)

Zapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov POMI

Similarity:

Subalternative algebras.

Cedilnik, A. (2000)

Acta Mathematica Universitatis Comenianae. New Series

Similarity:

Agassiz sum of algebras

G. Grätzer, J. Sichler (1974)

Colloquium Mathematicae

Similarity:

A structure theorem for differential algebras

Marcus Tressl (2002)

Banach Center Publications

Similarity:

A remark on v*-algebras

Kazimierz Urbanik (1969)

Colloquium Mathematicum

Similarity:

The class of 2-dimensional neat reducts is not elementary

Tarek Sayed Ahmed (2002)

Fundamenta Mathematicae

Similarity:

SC, CA, QA and QEA stand for the classes of Pinter's substitution algebras, Tarski's cylindric algebras, Halmos' quasipolyadic algebras and Halmos' quasipolyadic algebras with equality, respectively. Generalizing a result of Andréka and Németi on cylindric algebras, we show that for K ∈ SC,QA,CA,QEA and any β > 2 the class of 2-dimensional neat reducts of β-dimensional algebras in K is not closed under forming elementary subalgebras, hence is not elementary. Whether this result extends...