A problem of A. Monteiro concerning relative complementation of lattices
M. E. Adams (1974)
Colloquium Mathematicae
Similarity:
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
M. E. Adams (1974)
Colloquium Mathematicae
Similarity:
W. H. Graves, S. A. Selesnick (1973)
Colloquium Mathematicae
Similarity:
Bachoc, Christine, Batut, Christian (1992)
Experimental Mathematics
Similarity:
Hua Mao (2017)
Open Mathematics
Similarity:
We characterize complete atomistic lattices whose classification lattices are geometric. This implies an proper solution to a problem raised by S. Radeleczki in 2002.
R. Beazer (1974)
Colloquium Mathematicae
Similarity:
Batut, Christian, Quebbemann, Heinz-Georg, Scharlau, Rudolf (1995)
Experimental Mathematics
Similarity:
G. Szasz (1976)
Matematički Vesnik
Similarity:
V.B. Repnitskii (1995)
Semigroup forum
Similarity:
Edward Marczewski (1963)
Colloquium Mathematicum
Similarity:
Ami Korren (2001)
Visual Mathematics
Similarity:
B. Węglorz (1967)
Colloquium Mathematicae
Similarity:
Radomír Halaš (2002)
Discussiones Mathematicae - General Algebra and Applications
Similarity:
It is well known that every complete lattice can be considered as a complete lattice of closed sets with respect to appropriate closure operator. The theory of q-lattices as a natural generalization of lattices gives rise to a question whether a similar statement is true in the case of q-lattices. In the paper the so-called M-operators are introduced and it is shown that complete q-lattices are q-lattices of closed sets with respect to M-operators.
J. Quinn, R. Reichard (1974)
Colloquium Mathematicae
Similarity:
Y. A. Abramovich, A. K. Kitover
Similarity:
A linear operator T: X → Y between vector lattices is said to be disjointness preserving if T sends disjoint elements in X to disjoint elements in Y. Two closely related questions are discussed in this paper: (1) If T is invertible, under what assumptions does the inverse operator also preserve disjointness? (2) Under what assumptions is the operator T regular? These problems were considered by the authors in [5] but the current paper (closely related to [5] but self-contained) reflects...
Albert R. Stralka (1974)
Colloquium Mathematicae
Similarity:
R. Padmanabhan (1966)
Colloquium Mathematicae
Similarity: