The cardinal equation 2m=m
G. P. Monro (1974)
Colloquium Mathematicae
Similarity:
G. P. Monro (1974)
Colloquium Mathematicae
Similarity:
Arthur W. Apter (2013)
Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences. Mathematics
Similarity:
We investigate two global GCH patterns which are consistent with the existence of a tall cardinal, and also present some related open questions.
Arthur W. Apter (2012)
Fundamenta Mathematicae
Similarity:
We apply techniques due to Sargsyan to reduce the consistency strength of the assumptions used to establish an indestructibility theorem for supercompactness. We then show how these and additional techniques due to Sargsyan may be employed to establish an equiconsistency for a related indestructibility theorem for strongness.
Arthur W. Apter, Grigor Sargsyan (2007)
Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences. Mathematics
Similarity:
We show how to reduce the assumptions in consistency strength used to prove several theorems on universal indestructibility.
Kipiani, Archil (2015-10-26T11:51:40Z)
Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Mathematica
Similarity:
Julius Barbanel (1985)
Fundamenta Mathematicae
Similarity:
Arthur W. Apter (2015)
Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences. Mathematics
Similarity:
We construct a model for the level by level equivalence between strong compactness and supercompactness with an arbitrary large cardinal structure in which the least supercompact cardinal κ has its strong compactness indestructible under κ-directed closed forcing. This is in analogy to and generalizes the author's result in Arch. Math. Logic 46 (2007), but without the restriction that no cardinal is supercompact up to an inaccessible cardinal.
A. Wojciechowska (1972)
Fundamenta Mathematicae
Similarity:
Arthur Apter, James Henle (1991)
Fundamenta Mathematicae
Similarity:
Arthur Apter (1984)
Fundamenta Mathematicae
Similarity:
Arthur W. Apter, Shoshana Friedman (2014)
Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences. Mathematics
Similarity:
In an attempt to extend the property of being supercompact but not HOD-supercompact to a proper class of indestructibly supercompact cardinals, a theorem is discovered about a proper class of indestructibly supercompact cardinals which reveals a surprising incompatibility. However, it is still possible to force to get a model in which the property of being supercompact but not HOD-supercompact holds for the least supercompact cardinal κ₀, κ₀ is indestructibly supercompact, the strongly...
Alejandro Ramírez-Páramo (2008)
Colloquium Mathematicae
Similarity:
We establish a general technical result, which provides an algorithm to prove cardinal inequalities and relative versions of cardinal inequalities.
Arthur W. Apter (2003)
Fundamenta Mathematicae
Similarity:
We construct a model in which there is a strong cardinal κ whose strongness is indestructible under κ-strategically closed forcing and in which level by level equivalence between strong compactness and supercompactness holds non-trivially.
A. Abian (1976)
Publications de l'Institut Mathématique [Elektronische Ressource]
Similarity:
E. Kleinberg (1979)
Fundamenta Mathematicae
Similarity:
Arthur W. Apter (2012)
Colloquium Mathematicae
Similarity:
We establish two new Easton theorems for the least supercompact cardinal that are consistent with the level by level equivalence between strong compactness and supercompactness. These theorems generalize Theorem 1 in our earlier paper [Math. Logic Quart. 51 (2005)]. In both our ground model and the model witnessing the conclusions of our present theorems, there are no restrictions on the structure of the class of supercompact cardinals.