Displaying similar documents to “Personal and inter-personal ethics: Discussion.”

Toward a more ethical clinical trial.

Joseph B. Kadane, Nell Sedransk (1980)

Trabajos de Estadística e Investigación Operativa

Similarity:

Current methods of conducting clinical trials require the patient to agree to have his treatment assigned randomly, where his individual characteristics are taken into account only to balance the treatment groups. A Bayesian alternative involves eliciting the prior opinions of the group of clinicians who designed the study. Each patient is then guaranteed that the treatment he will receive is the best for him either in the opinion of at least one individual clinician or as a consensus...

Overcoming priors anxiety.

G. D'AGOSTINI (1999)

Revista de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales

Similarity:

Improving judgements using feedback: Discussion.

Ian R. Dunsmore, Seymour Geisser, José M. Bernardo, A. Philip Dawid, William H. DuMouchel, Simon French, Irving John Good, Dennis B. Lindley, Arnold Zellner (1980)

Trabajos de Estadística e Investigación Operativa

Similarity:

Discussion on the papers by DeGroot, Morris H., Improving predictive distributions and by Press, S. James, Bayesian inference in group judgement formulation and decision making using qualitative controlled feedback, both of them part of a round table on Improving judgements using feedback held in the First International Congress on Bayesian Methods (Valencia, Spain, 28 May - 2 June 1979).

Coherence of models and utilities: Discussion.

James M. Dickey, William H. DuMouchel, José M. Bernardo, Simon French, Joseph B. Kadane, Dennis V. Lindley, Anthony O'Hagan, Adrian F. M. Smith, Thomas W. F. Stroud (1980)

Trabajos de Estadística e Investigación Operativa

Similarity:

Discussion on the papers by Leonard, Tom, The roles of inductive modelling and coherence in Bayesian statistics and by Novick, Melvin R., Dekeyrel, D.F. and Chuang, D.T., Local and regional coherence utility assessment procedures, both of them part of a round table on Coherence of models and utilities held in the First International Congress on Bayesian Methods (Valencia, Spain, 28 May - 2 June 1979).

Likelihood, sufficiency and ancillarity: Discussion.

George A. Barnard, P. R. Freeman, Daniel Peña, James M. Dickey, Seymour Geisser, Dennis V. Lindley, Anthony O'Hagan, Adrian F. M. Smith (1980)

Trabajos de Estadística e Investigación Operativa

Similarity:

Discussion on the papers by Akaike, Hirotugu, Likelihood and the Bayes procedure and by Dawid, A. Philip, A Bayesian look at nuisance parameters, both of them part of a round table on Likelihood, sufficiency and ancillarity held in the First International Congress on Bayesian Methods (Valencia, Spain, 28 May - 2 June 1979).

On not being rational.

I. Richard Savage (1980)

Trabajos de Estadística e Investigación Operativa

Similarity:

A Bayesian decision-theoretic approach appears to me as a sensible idealization of a guide to behaviour. At the same time i would like to understand why my behaviour is not always of this form: I sometimes use randomization and I sometimes find confidence intervals acceptable. Not all of my problems have an explicit cost function. Am I lazy or irrational? Do I use non-Bayesian conventions to help communicate? Is the cost of rationality-computation missing from the Bayesian model? ...

Statistical and decision theoretic aspects of examination assessment.

Simon French (1989)

Trabajos de Estadística

Similarity:

At a recent conference in Innsbruck, held in memory of Bruno De Finetti, attention focused on one of his aphorisms: analysts should think about things. This paper seeks to do precisely that in the context of public examinations in England and Wales. It attempts to think about those quantitative things that are done to marks in the process of assessing candidate scripts. Public examinations are central to our education system: hundreds of thousands of candidates enter them every year....

Foundations of subjective probability and decision making: Discussion.

Irving John Good, Ludovico Piccinato, Cesáreo Villegas, James M. Dickey, Morris H. DeGroot, Donald A. S. Fraser, Simon French, Dennis V. Lindley (1980)

Trabajos de Estadística e Investigación Operativa

Similarity:

Discussion on the papers by Girón, F. J. and Ríos, S., Quasi-Bayesian behaviour: a more realistic approach to dicision making? and by Hill, B. M., On finite additivity, non-conglomerability and statistical paradoxes, both of them part of a round table on Foundations of Subjective Probability and Decision Making held in the First International Congress on Bayesian Methods (Valencia, Spain, 28 May - 2 June 1979).

Hypothesis testing: Discussion.

Edwin T. Jaynes, David J. Spiegelhalter, Hirotugu Akaike, Arthur P. Dempster, James M. Dickey, Seymour Geisser, Irving John Good, Dennis V. Lindley, Anthony O'Hagan, Arnold Zellner (1980)

Trabajos de Estadística e Investigación Operativa

Similarity:

Discussion on the papers by Zellner, Arnold and Siow, Aloysius, Posterior odds ratios for selected regression hypotheses and by Bernardo, José M., A Bayesian analysis of classical hypotheses testing, both of them part of a round table on Hypothesis testing held in the First International Congress on Bayesian Methods (Valencia, Spain, 28 May - 2 June 1979).