Displaying similar documents to “Overcoming priors anxiety.”

Foundations of subjective probability and decision making: Discussion.

Irving John Good, Ludovico Piccinato, Cesáreo Villegas, James M. Dickey, Morris H. DeGroot, Donald A. S. Fraser, Simon French, Dennis V. Lindley (1980)

Trabajos de Estadística e Investigación Operativa

Similarity:

Discussion on the papers by Girón, F. J. and Ríos, S., Quasi-Bayesian behaviour: a more realistic approach to dicision making? and by Hill, B. M., On finite additivity, non-conglomerability and statistical paradoxes, both of them part of a round table on Foundations of Subjective Probability and Decision Making held in the First International Congress on Bayesian Methods (Valencia, Spain, 28 May - 2 June 1979).

Likelihood, sufficiency and ancillarity: Discussion.

George A. Barnard, P. R. Freeman, Daniel Peña, James M. Dickey, Seymour Geisser, Dennis V. Lindley, Anthony O'Hagan, Adrian F. M. Smith (1980)

Trabajos de Estadística e Investigación Operativa

Similarity:

Discussion on the papers by Akaike, Hirotugu, Likelihood and the Bayes procedure and by Dawid, A. Philip, A Bayesian look at nuisance parameters, both of them part of a round table on Likelihood, sufficiency and ancillarity held in the First International Congress on Bayesian Methods (Valencia, Spain, 28 May - 2 June 1979).

Coherence of models and utilities: Discussion.

James M. Dickey, William H. DuMouchel, José M. Bernardo, Simon French, Joseph B. Kadane, Dennis V. Lindley, Anthony O'Hagan, Adrian F. M. Smith, Thomas W. F. Stroud (1980)

Trabajos de Estadística e Investigación Operativa

Similarity:

Discussion on the papers by Leonard, Tom, The roles of inductive modelling and coherence in Bayesian statistics and by Novick, Melvin R., Dekeyrel, D.F. and Chuang, D.T., Local and regional coherence utility assessment procedures, both of them part of a round table on Coherence of models and utilities held in the First International Congress on Bayesian Methods (Valencia, Spain, 28 May - 2 June 1979).

Improving judgements using feedback: Discussion.

Ian R. Dunsmore, Seymour Geisser, José M. Bernardo, A. Philip Dawid, William H. DuMouchel, Simon French, Irving John Good, Dennis B. Lindley, Arnold Zellner (1980)

Trabajos de Estadística e Investigación Operativa

Similarity:

Discussion on the papers by DeGroot, Morris H., Improving predictive distributions and by Press, S. James, Bayesian inference in group judgement formulation and decision making using qualitative controlled feedback, both of them part of a round table on Improving judgements using feedback held in the First International Congress on Bayesian Methods (Valencia, Spain, 28 May - 2 June 1979).

Hypothesis testing: Discussion.

Edwin T. Jaynes, David J. Spiegelhalter, Hirotugu Akaike, Arthur P. Dempster, James M. Dickey, Seymour Geisser, Irving John Good, Dennis V. Lindley, Anthony O'Hagan, Arnold Zellner (1980)

Trabajos de Estadística e Investigación Operativa

Similarity:

Discussion on the papers by Zellner, Arnold and Siow, Aloysius, Posterior odds ratios for selected regression hypotheses and by Bernardo, José M., A Bayesian analysis of classical hypotheses testing, both of them part of a round table on Hypothesis testing held in the First International Congress on Bayesian Methods (Valencia, Spain, 28 May - 2 June 1979).

Some history of the hierarchical Bayesian methodology.

Irving John Good (1980)

Trabajos de Estadística e Investigación Operativa

Similarity:

A standard tecnique in subjective Bayesian methodology is for a subject (you) to make judgements of the probabilities that a physical probability lies in various intervals. In the Bayesian hierarchical technique you make probability judgements (of a higher type, order, level or stage) concerning the judgements of lower type. The paper will outline some of the history of this hierarchical technique with emphasis on the contributions by I. J. Good because I have read every word written...

On not being rational.

I. Richard Savage (1980)

Trabajos de Estadística e Investigación Operativa

Similarity:

A Bayesian decision-theoretic approach appears to me as a sensible idealization of a guide to behaviour. At the same time i would like to understand why my behaviour is not always of this form: I sometimes use randomization and I sometimes find confidence intervals acceptable. Not all of my problems have an explicit cost function. Am I lazy or irrational? Do I use non-Bayesian conventions to help communicate? Is the cost of rationality-computation missing from the Bayesian model? ...

Personal and inter-personal ethics: Discussion.

Dennis V. Lindley, Allan M. Skene, José M. Bernardo, Morris H. DeGroot, Irving John Good, Anthony O'Hagan (1980)

Trabajos de Estadística e Investigación Operativa

Similarity:

Discussion on the papers by Savage, I. Richard, On not being rational and by Kadane, Joseph B. and Sedransj, Nell, Toward a more ethical clinical trial, both of them part of a round table on Personal and inter-personal ethics held in the First International Congress on Bayesian Methods (Valencia, Spain, 28 May - 2 June 1979).