Erratum to "Fields of surreal numbers and exponentiation" (Fund. Math. 167 (2001), 173-188)
Lou van den Dries, Philip Ehrlich (2001)
Fundamenta Mathematicae
Similarity:
Lou van den Dries, Philip Ehrlich (2001)
Fundamenta Mathematicae
Similarity:
Paola D'Aquino, Angus Macintyre, Giuseppina Terzo (2010)
Fundamenta Mathematicae
Similarity:
We characterize the unsolvable exponential polynomials over the exponential fields introduced by Zilber, and deduce Picard's Little Theorem for such fields.
M. Stojaković (1972)
Publications de l'Institut Mathématique
Similarity:
Garyfalos Papaschinopoulos, John Schinas (1985)
Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal
Similarity:
Irving Stringham (1893)
Bulletin of the New York Mathematical Society
Similarity:
Bartolucci, A.A., Dickey, J.M., Singh, K.P., Tabatabai, M.A. (1998)
Southwest Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics [electronic only]
Similarity:
Ding, Ping (2005)
Journal of Mathematical Sciences (New York)
Similarity:
Bachman, Gennady (1999)
Electronic Research Announcements of the American Mathematical Society [electronic only]
Similarity:
Wojciech Niemiro (1984)
Colloquium Mathematicae
Similarity:
Roman Taberski (1989)
Banach Center Publications
Similarity:
E. Bombieri (1978)
Inventiones mathematicae
Similarity:
Lou van den Dries, Philip Ehrlich (2001)
Fundamenta Mathematicae
Similarity:
We show that Conway's field of surreal numbers with its natural exponential function has the same elementary properties as the exponential field of real numbers. We obtain ordinal bounds on the length of products, reciprocals, exponentials and logarithms of surreal numbers in terms of the lengths of their inputs. It follows that the set of surreal numbers of length less than a given ordinal is a subfield of the field of all surreal numbers if and only if this ordinal is an ε-number....