Incommensurability and laboratory science

Emiliano Trizio

Philosophia Scientiae (2004)

  • Volume: 8, Issue: 1, page 235-267
  • ISSN: 1281-2463

Abstract

top
The aim of the article is to establish relations between Kuhn’s general characterization of incommensurability as the impossibility to translate the taxonomies pertaining to rival scientific theories into one another and Hacking’s more specific version of incommensurability affecting competing theories that have stabilized relatively to different laboratory equipments and measurement techniques. On the basis of an analysis of the nature of scientific taxonomies that takes its inspiration from the works of Duhem, it will be argued that Kuhn’s language-based approach is inadequate to provide an account of the way scientific terms apply to nature in the domain of physical laboratory science, in which the role of measurement procedures is essential. The analysis will be carried out by introducing the notion of dual taxonomy and the notion of ostensive characterof a theory. It will result that, once these two notions are taken into account, it becomes possible to lay the foundations of an enlarged taxonomic version of incommensurability which can provide a common framework for the discussion of the examples introduced by Kuhn and Hacking.

How to cite

top

Trizio, Emiliano. "Incommensurability and laboratory science." Philosophia Scientiae 8.1 (2004): 235-267. <http://eudml.org/doc/103715>.

@article{Trizio2004,
abstract = {The aim of the article is to establish relations between Kuhn’s general characterization of incommensurability as the impossibility to translate the taxonomies pertaining to rival scientific theories into one another and Hacking’s more specific version of incommensurability affecting competing theories that have stabilized relatively to different laboratory equipments and measurement techniques. On the basis of an analysis of the nature of scientific taxonomies that takes its inspiration from the works of Duhem, it will be argued that Kuhn’s language-based approach is inadequate to provide an account of the way scientific terms apply to nature in the domain of physical laboratory science, in which the role of measurement procedures is essential. The analysis will be carried out by introducing the notion of dual taxonomy and the notion of ostensive characterof a theory. It will result that, once these two notions are taken into account, it becomes possible to lay the foundations of an enlarged taxonomic version of incommensurability which can provide a common framework for the discussion of the examples introduced by Kuhn and Hacking.},
author = {Trizio, Emiliano},
journal = {Philosophia Scientiae},
language = {eng},
number = {1},
pages = {235-267},
publisher = {Éditions Kimé},
title = {Incommensurability and laboratory science},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/103715},
volume = {8},
year = {2004},
}

TY - JOUR
AU - Trizio, Emiliano
TI - Incommensurability and laboratory science
JO - Philosophia Scientiae
PY - 2004
PB - Éditions Kimé
VL - 8
IS - 1
SP - 235
EP - 267
AB - The aim of the article is to establish relations between Kuhn’s general characterization of incommensurability as the impossibility to translate the taxonomies pertaining to rival scientific theories into one another and Hacking’s more specific version of incommensurability affecting competing theories that have stabilized relatively to different laboratory equipments and measurement techniques. On the basis of an analysis of the nature of scientific taxonomies that takes its inspiration from the works of Duhem, it will be argued that Kuhn’s language-based approach is inadequate to provide an account of the way scientific terms apply to nature in the domain of physical laboratory science, in which the role of measurement procedures is essential. The analysis will be carried out by introducing the notion of dual taxonomy and the notion of ostensive characterof a theory. It will result that, once these two notions are taken into account, it becomes possible to lay the foundations of an enlarged taxonomic version of incommensurability which can provide a common framework for the discussion of the examples introduced by Kuhn and Hacking.
LA - eng
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/103715
ER -

References

top
  1. [1] S. Allén (editor) 1989.— Possible Worlds in Humanities, Arts and Sciences: Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 65, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 1983: PSA 1982: Proceedings of the 1982 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, vol. 2. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, MR988911
  2. [2] Carnap, Rudolf1963.— Intellectual Autobiography, in P. A. Schilpp (editor), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, Lasalle, IL: Open Court. 
  3. [3] Cartwright, Nancy1993.— How We Relate Theory to Observation, in [Horwich 1993, 259-273 ] . 
  4. [4] Cassirer, Ernst1910.— Substanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff, Berlin: Bruno Cassirer Verlag. 
  5. [5] Duhem, Pierre1906.— La théorie Physique : son objet, sa structure, Paris : Vrin. English translation by P. P. Wiener, 1991, The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, Princeton: Princeton University Press. Zbl0058.17503MR1145487
  6. [6] Fine A., Forbes M. and Wessels L. (editors) 1991.— PSA 1990: Proceedings of the 1990 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, volume 2, East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association. 
  7. [7] Hacking, Ian1983.— Representing and intervening, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 
  8. [8] Hacking, Ian1992.— The Self-Vindication of the Laboratory Sciences, in [Pickering 1992, 29-64 ] . 
  9. [9] Hacking, Ian1993.— Working in a New World: The Taxonomic Solution, in [Horwich 1993, 275-310 ] . 
  10. [10] Hacking, Ian2003.— L’importance de la classification chez le dernier Kuhn, Archives de Philosophie, 66(3) : 389-402. 
  11. [11] Hiley D., Bohman J. and Shusterman R. (editors) 1991.— The Interpretative Turn: Philosophy, Science, Culture, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. 
  12. [12] Horwich, Paul (editor) 1993.— World Changes, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. MR1222714
  13. [13] Hoyningen-Huene, Paul1989.— Die Wissenschaftsphilosophie Thomas S. Kuhns: Rekonstruktion und Grundlagenprobleme. Braunschweig: Vieweg. English translation by A. T. Levine, 1993, Reconstructing Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. The pages mentioned in the paper are the ones of the English edition. 
  14. [14] Husserl, Edmund1992.— Logische Untersuchungen, Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag. 
  15. [15] Kuhn, Thomas1961.— The function of Measurement in Modern Physical Science, Isis 52: 161-193. Reprinted in [Kuhn 1977, 178-224 ] . The pages mentioned in the paper are the ones of this last book. 
  16. [16] Kuhn, Thomas1970a.— Reflections on My Critics, in [Lakatos Musgrave 1970, 231-78 ] . Reprinted in [Kuhn 2000, 123-175 ] . The pages mentioned in the paper are the ones of this last book. 
  17. [17] Kuhn, Thomas1970b.— The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2 n d edition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 
  18. [18] Kuhn, Thomas1974.— Second Thoughts on Paradigms, in F. Suppe, ed., The Structure of Scientific Theories. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 459-482. Reprinted in [Kuhn 1977, 293-319 ] . The pages mentioned in the paper are the ones of this last book. MR392268
  19. [19] Kuhn, Thomas1977.— The Essential Tension, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 
  20. [20] Kuhn, Thomas1983.— Commensurability, Comparability, Communicability, in [Asquit Nickles 1983, 669-688 ] . Reprinted in [Kuhn 2000, 33-57 ] . The pages mentioned in the paper are the ones of this last book. MR1891737
  21. [21] Kuhn, Thomas1989.— Possible Worlds in History of Science, in [Allén 1989, 49-51 ] . Reprinted in [Kuhn 2000, 58-89 ] . The pages mentioned in the paper are the ones of this last book. 
  22. [22] Kuhn, Thomas1991a.— The Road since Structure, in [Fine, Forbes Wessels 1991, 3-13. Reprinted in [Kuhn 2000, 90-104 ] . The pages mentioned in the paper are the ones of this last book. 
  23. [23] Kuhn, Thomas1991b.— The Natural and the Human Sciences, in [Hiley, Bohman Shusterman 1991, 17-24 ] . Reprinted in [Kuhn 2000, 216-223 ] . The pages mentioned in the paper are the ones of this last book. 
  24. [24] Kuhn, Thomas1993.— Afterwords, in [Horwich 1993, 311-341 ] . Reprinted in [Kuhn 2000, 224-252 ] . The pages mentioned in the paper are the ones of this last book. 
  25. [25] Kuhn, Thomas2000.— The Road Since Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 
  26. [26] Lakatos, Imre and Musgrave allan (editors) 1970.— Criticism and Growth of Knowledge: Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, London 1965, volume 4, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. MR403864
  27. [27] Parrini, Paolo2002.— L’empirismo logico, Roma: Carocci editore. 
  28. [28] Pickering, Andrew1984.— Constructing Quarks, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 
  29. [29] Pickering, Andrew1995.— The Mangle of Practice, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Zbl0834.01019
  30. [30] Pickering, Andrew (editor) 1992.— Science as practice and culture, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 
  31. [31] Soler, Léna2003.— De la commune mesure phénoménale entre théories physiques dites incommensurables, Philosophia Scientiae, 7(2) : 239-265. 
  32. [32] Suppe F. (editor) 1974.— The Structure of Scientific Theories, Urbana: University of Illinois Press. MR392268

NotesEmbed ?

top

You must be logged in to post comments.

To embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.

Only the controls for the widget will be shown in your chosen language. Notes will be shown in their authored language.

Tells the widget how many notes to show per page. You can cycle through additional notes using the next and previous controls.

    
                

                
Note: Best practice suggests putting the JavaScript code just before the closing </body> tag.