Transforming stochastic matrices for stochastic comparison with the st-order
Tuğrul Dayar; Jean-Michel Fourneau; Nihal Pekergin
RAIRO - Operations Research (2010)
- Volume: 37, Issue: 2, page 85-97
- ISSN: 0399-0559
Access Full Article
topAbstract
topHow to cite
topDayar, Tuğrul, Fourneau, Jean-Michel, and Pekergin, Nihal. "Transforming stochastic matrices for stochastic comparison with the st-order." RAIRO - Operations Research 37.2 (2010): 85-97. <http://eudml.org/doc/105284>.
@article{Dayar2010,
abstract = {
We present a transformation for stochastic matrices and analyze the
effects of using it in stochastic comparison with the strong stochastic
(st) order. We show that unless the given stochastic matrix is row diagonally
dominant, the transformed matrix provides better
st bounds on the steady state probability distribution.
},
author = {Dayar, Tuğrul, Fourneau, Jean-Michel, Pekergin, Nihal},
journal = {RAIRO - Operations Research},
keywords = {Markov processes; probability distributions; stochastic ordering; st-order.; st-order},
language = {eng},
month = {3},
number = {2},
pages = {85-97},
publisher = {EDP Sciences},
title = {Transforming stochastic matrices for stochastic comparison with the st-order},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/105284},
volume = {37},
year = {2010},
}
TY - JOUR
AU - Dayar, Tuğrul
AU - Fourneau, Jean-Michel
AU - Pekergin, Nihal
TI - Transforming stochastic matrices for stochastic comparison with the st-order
JO - RAIRO - Operations Research
DA - 2010/3//
PB - EDP Sciences
VL - 37
IS - 2
SP - 85
EP - 97
AB -
We present a transformation for stochastic matrices and analyze the
effects of using it in stochastic comparison with the strong stochastic
(st) order. We show that unless the given stochastic matrix is row diagonally
dominant, the transformed matrix provides better
st bounds on the steady state probability distribution.
LA - eng
KW - Markov processes; probability distributions; stochastic ordering; st-order.; st-order
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/105284
ER -
References
top- O. Abu-Amsha and J.-M. Vincent, An algorithm to bound functionals of Markov chains with large state space, in 4th INFORMS Conference on Telecommunications. Boca Raton, Florida (1998). Available as Rapport de recherche MAI No. 25. IMAG, Grenoble, France (1996).
- M. Benmammoun, J.M. Fourneau, N. Pekergin and A. Troubnikoff, An algorithmic and numerical approach to bound the performance of high speed networks, IEEE MASCOTS 2002. Fort Worth, USA (2002) 375-382.
- J. Keilson and A. Kester, Monotone matrices and monotone Markov processes. Stochastic Process. Appl.5 (1977) 231-241.
- J.M. Fourneau and N. Pekergin, An algorithmic approach to stochastic bounds, Performance evaluation of complex systems: Techniques and Tools. Springer, Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci. 2459 (2002) 64-88.
- J.M. Fourneau, M. Le Coz, N. Pekergin and F. Quessette, An open tool to compute stochastic bounds on steady-state distributions and rewards, IEEE Mascots 03. USA (2003).
- J.M. Fourneau, M. Le Coz and F. Quessette, Algorithms for an irreducible and lumpable strong stochastic bound, Numerical Solution of Markov Chains. USA (2003).
- M. Kijima, Markov Processes for stochastic modeling. Chapman & Hall (1997).
- W.A. Massey, Stochastic orderings for Markov processes on partially ordered spaces. Math. Oper. Res.12 (1987) 350-367.
- N. Pekergin, Stochastic delay bounds on fair queueing algorithms, in Proc. of INFOCOM'99. New York (1999) 1212-1220.
- N. Pekergin, Stochastic performance bounds by state reduction. Performance Evaluation36-37 (1999) 1-17.
- M. Shaked and J.G. Shantikumar, Stochastic Orders and their Applications. Academic Press, California (1994).
- D. Stoyan, Comparison Methods for Queues and Other Stochastic Models. John Wiley & Sons, Berlin, Germany (1983).
- H.M. Taylor and S. Karlin, An Introduction to Stochastic Modeling. Academic Press, Florida (1984).
- M. Tremolieres, J.-M. Vincent and B. Plateau, Determination of the optimal upper bound of a Markovian generator, Technical Report 106. LGI-IMAG, Grenoble, France (1992).
- L. Truffet, Near complete decomposability: bounding the error by stochastic comparison method. Adv. Appl. Probab.29 (1997) 830-855.
NotesEmbed ?
topTo embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.