Discussion of D. Denis. Fisher : responsible, not guilty

Bruno Lecoutre; Jacques Poitevineau; Marie-Paule Lecoutre

Journal de la société française de statistique (2004)

  • Volume: 145, Issue: 4, page 55-62
  • ISSN: 1962-5197

How to cite

top

Lecoutre, Bruno, Poitevineau, Jacques, and Lecoutre, Marie-Paule. "Discussion of D. Denis. Fisher : responsible, not guilty." Journal de la société française de statistique 145.4 (2004): 55-62. <http://eudml.org/doc/199175>.

@article{Lecoutre2004,
author = {Lecoutre, Bruno, Poitevineau, Jacques, Lecoutre, Marie-Paule},
journal = {Journal de la société française de statistique},
language = {eng},
number = {4},
pages = {55-62},
publisher = {Société française de statistique},
title = {Discussion of D. Denis. Fisher : responsible, not guilty},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/199175},
volume = {145},
year = {2004},
}

TY - JOUR
AU - Lecoutre, Bruno
AU - Poitevineau, Jacques
AU - Lecoutre, Marie-Paule
TI - Discussion of D. Denis. Fisher : responsible, not guilty
JO - Journal de la société française de statistique
PY - 2004
PB - Société française de statistique
VL - 145
IS - 4
SP - 55
EP - 62
LA - eng
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/199175
ER -

References

top
  1. BERGER J. O. (2003). Could Fisher, Jeffreys and Neyman Have Agreed on Testing? [With discussion]. Statistical Science, 18, 1-32. Zbl1048.62006MR1997064
  2. BERKSON J. (1942). Tests of significance considered as evidence. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 37, 325-335. 
  3. EFRON B. (1998). R.A. Fisher in the 21st century [With discussion]. Statistical Science, 13, 95-122. Zbl1074.01536MR1647499
  4. FISHER R. A. (1926). The Arrangement of Field Experiments. Journal of the Ministry of Agriculture of Great Britain, 33, 503-513. 
  5. FISHER R. A. (1928). The Effect of Psychological Card Preferences. Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research, 38, 269-271. 
  6. FISHER R. A. (1929). The Statistical Method in Psychical Research. Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research, 38, 189-192. 
  7. FISHER R. A. (1958). The Nature of Probability. Centennial Review, 2, 261-274. 
  8. FISHER R. A. (1959). Smoking. The cancer controversy, Edindurgh: Oliver and Boyd. 
  9. FISHER R. A. (1962). Some examples of Bayes's method of the experimental determination of probabilities a priori. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 24, 118-124. Zbl0114.10203MR149625
  10. GOODMAN S. N., & BERLIN J. A. (1994). The use of predicted confidence intervals when planning experiments and the misuse of power when interpreting results. Annals of Internal Medicine, 121, 200-206. 
  11. KRUSKAL W. H. (1980). The significance of Fisher: A review of R.A. Fisher, the life of a scientist. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75, 1019-1030. 
  12. LECOUTRE B. (2004). Expérimentation, inférence statistique et analyse causale. Intellectica, 38, 193-245. 
  13. LECOUTRE B. (2005). The right use of interval estimates in ANOVA. Submitted for publication. 
  14. LECOUTRE M.-P., POITEVINEAU J., & LECOUTRE B. (2003). Even statisticians are not immune to misinterpretations of Null Hypothesis Significance Tests. International Journal of Psychology, 38, 37-45. 
  15. LEHMANN E. L. (1993). The Fisher, Neyman-Pearson theories of testing hypotheses: one theory or two? Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 1242-1249. Zbl0805.62023MR1245356
  16. MORRISON D. E., & HENKEL R. E. (Eds.) (1970). The Significance Test Controversy - A Reader. London: Butterwoths. 
  17. NEYMAN J., & PEARSON E. S. ( 1933a). On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 231, 289-337. Zbl0006.26804JFM59.1163.02
  18. NEYMAN J., & PEARSON E. S. ( 1933b). The testing of statistical hypotheses in relation to probabilities a priori. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 29, 492-510. Zbl0008.02401JFM59.1163.03
  19. OAKES M. (1986). Statistical Inference: A Commentary for the Social and Behavioural Sciences. New York: Wiley. 
  20. PERLMAN M. D., & WU L. (1999). The emperor's new tests. Statistical Science, 14, 355-369. Zbl1059.62515MR1765215
  21. SAVAGE L. J. (1976). On rereading R.A. Fisher [With discussion]. Annals of Statistics, 4, 441-500. Zbl0325.62008MR403889
  22. STREET D. J. (1990). Fisher's contributions to agricultural statistics. Biometrics, 46, 937-945. Zbl0726.01011
  23. TRYON W. W. (2001). Evaluating statistical difference, equivalence, and indeterminacy using inferential confidence intervals: An integrated alternative method of conducting null hypothesis statistical tests. Psychological-methods, 6, 371-386. 
  24. WILKINSON L. and Task Force on Statistical Inference, APA Board of Scientific Affairs (1999). Statistical Methods in Psychology Journals: Guidelines and Explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594-604. 
  25. YATES F. (1964). Sir Ronald Fisher and the design of experiments. Biometrics, 20, 307-321. 

NotesEmbed ?

top

You must be logged in to post comments.

To embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.

Only the controls for the widget will be shown in your chosen language. Notes will be shown in their authored language.

Tells the widget how many notes to show per page. You can cycle through additional notes using the next and previous controls.

    
                

Note: Best practice suggests putting the JavaScript code just before the closing </body> tag.