# On AP spaces in concern with compact-like sets and submaximality

Mi Ae Moon; Myung Hyun Cho; Junhui Kim

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae (2011)

- Volume: 52, Issue: 2, page 293-302
- ISSN: 0010-2628

## Access Full Article

top## Abstract

top## How to cite

topMoon, Mi Ae, Cho, Myung Hyun, and Kim, Junhui. "On AP spaces in concern with compact-like sets and submaximality." Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae 52.2 (2011): 293-302. <http://eudml.org/doc/246259>.

@article{Moon2011,

abstract = {The definitions of AP and WAP were originated in categorical topology by A. Pultr and A. Tozzi, Equationally closed subframes and representation of quotient spaces, Cahiers Topologie Géom. Différentielle Catég. 34 (1993), no. 3, 167-183. In general, we have the implications: $T_2\Rightarrow KC \Rightarrow US \Rightarrow T_1$, where $KC$ is defined as the property that every compact subset is closed and $US$ is defined as the property that every convergent sequence has at most one limit. And a space is called submaximal if every dense subset is open. In this paper, we prove that: (1) every AP $T_1$-space is $US$, (2) every nodec WAP $T_1$-space is submaximal, (3) every submaximal and collectionwise Hausdorff space is AP. We obtain that, as corollaries, (1) every countably compact (or compact or sequentially compact) AP $T_1$-space is Fréchet-Urysohn and $US$, which is a generalization of Hong’s result in On spaces in which compact-like sets are closed, and related spaces, Commun. Korean Math. Soc. 22 (2007), no. 2, 297-303, (2) if a space is nodec and $T_3$, then submaximality, AP and WAP are equivalent. Finally, we prove, by giving several counterexamples, that (1) in the statement that every submaximal $T_3$-space is AP, the condition $T_3$ is necessary and (2) there is no implication between nodec and WAP.},

author = {Moon, Mi Ae, Cho, Myung Hyun, Kim, Junhui},

journal = {Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae},

keywords = {AP; WAP; door; submaximal; nodec; unique sequential limit; AP; WAP; door; submaximal; nodec; unique sequential limit},

language = {eng},

number = {2},

pages = {293-302},

publisher = {Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics},

title = {On AP spaces in concern with compact-like sets and submaximality},

url = {http://eudml.org/doc/246259},

volume = {52},

year = {2011},

}

TY - JOUR

AU - Moon, Mi Ae

AU - Cho, Myung Hyun

AU - Kim, Junhui

TI - On AP spaces in concern with compact-like sets and submaximality

JO - Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

PY - 2011

PB - Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics

VL - 52

IS - 2

SP - 293

EP - 302

AB - The definitions of AP and WAP were originated in categorical topology by A. Pultr and A. Tozzi, Equationally closed subframes and representation of quotient spaces, Cahiers Topologie Géom. Différentielle Catég. 34 (1993), no. 3, 167-183. In general, we have the implications: $T_2\Rightarrow KC \Rightarrow US \Rightarrow T_1$, where $KC$ is defined as the property that every compact subset is closed and $US$ is defined as the property that every convergent sequence has at most one limit. And a space is called submaximal if every dense subset is open. In this paper, we prove that: (1) every AP $T_1$-space is $US$, (2) every nodec WAP $T_1$-space is submaximal, (3) every submaximal and collectionwise Hausdorff space is AP. We obtain that, as corollaries, (1) every countably compact (or compact or sequentially compact) AP $T_1$-space is Fréchet-Urysohn and $US$, which is a generalization of Hong’s result in On spaces in which compact-like sets are closed, and related spaces, Commun. Korean Math. Soc. 22 (2007), no. 2, 297-303, (2) if a space is nodec and $T_3$, then submaximality, AP and WAP are equivalent. Finally, we prove, by giving several counterexamples, that (1) in the statement that every submaximal $T_3$-space is AP, the condition $T_3$ is necessary and (2) there is no implication between nodec and WAP.

LA - eng

KW - AP; WAP; door; submaximal; nodec; unique sequential limit; AP; WAP; door; submaximal; nodec; unique sequential limit

UR - http://eudml.org/doc/246259

ER -

## References

top- Adams M.E., Belaid K., Dridi L., Echi O., 10.3318/PRIA.2008.108.2.137, Math. Proc. R. Ir. Acad. 108 (2008), no. 2, 137–147. Zbl1171.54019MR2475807DOI10.3318/PRIA.2008.108.2.137
- Arhangel'skii A.V., Collins P.J., 10.1016/0166-8641(94)00093-I, Topology Appl. 64 (1995), no. 3, 219–241. MR1342519DOI10.1016/0166-8641(94)00093-I
- Arhangel'skii A.V., Pontryagin L.S. (eds.), General Topology I, Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences, 17, Springer, Berlin, 1990. MR1077251
- Bella A., On spaces with the property of weak approximation by points, Comment. Math. Univ. Carolin. 35 (1994), no. 2, 357–360. Zbl0808.54007MR1286582
- Bella A., Costantini C., 10.1016/j.topol.2008.04.005, Topology Appl. 155 (2008), no. 13, 1426–1429. Zbl1145.54014MR2427414DOI10.1016/j.topol.2008.04.005
- Bella A., Yaschenko I.V., On AP and WAP spaces, Comment. Math. Univ. Carolin. 40 (1999), no. 3, 531–536. Zbl1010.54040MR1732483
- Bezhanishvili G., Esakia L., Gabelaia D., 10.1007/s11225-005-4648-6, , Studia Logica 81 (2005), no. 3, 3250-355. Zbl1096.03016MR2195500DOI10.1007/s11225-005-4648-6
- Bourbaki N., General Topology, Part I, Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., Hermann, Paris, 1966.
- Cho Myung Hyun, Discovering Modern General Topology, Kyung Moon Publishers, Seoul, 2001.
- Dontchev J., On door spaces, Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 26 (1995), no. 9, 873–881. Zbl0835.54003MR1347535
- van Douwen E.K., 10.1016/0166-8641(93)90145-4, Topology Appl. 51 (1993), no. 2, 125–139. Zbl0845.54028MR1229708DOI10.1016/0166-8641(93)90145-4
- Dow A., Tkachenko M.G., Tkachuk V.V., Wilson R.G., Topologies generated by discrete subspaces, Glas. Math. Ser. III 37(57) (2002), no. 1, 187–210. Zbl1009.54005MR1918105
- Dugundji J., Topology, Allyn and Bacon, Inc., Boston, 1966. Zbl0397.54003MR0193606
- Franklin S.P., Spaces in which sequences suffice II, Fund. Math. 61 (1967), 51–56. Zbl0168.43502MR0222832
- Hong W.C., 10.4134/JKMS.2007.44.2.261, J. Korean Math. Soc. 44 (2007), no. 2, 261–273. Zbl1143.54001MR2295388DOI10.4134/JKMS.2007.44.2.261
- Hong W.C., 10.4134/CKMS.2007.22.2.297, Commun. Korean Math. Soc. 22 (2007), no. 2, 297–303. Zbl1168.54304MR2313452DOI10.4134/CKMS.2007.22.2.297
- Ismail M., Nyikos P., 10.1016/0166-8641(80)90027-9, Topology Appl. 11 (1980), no. 3, 281–292. Zbl0434.54018MR0585273DOI10.1016/0166-8641(80)90027-9
- Kelley J.L., General Topology, Springer, Berlin, 1955. Zbl0518.54001MR0370454
- Pultr A., Tozzi A., Equationally closed subframes and representation of quotient spaces, Cahiers Topologie Géom. Différentielle Catég. 34 (1993), no. 3, 167–183. Zbl0789.54008MR1239466
- Simon P., On accumulation points, Cahiers Topologie Géom. Différentielle Catég. 35 (1994), no. 4, 321–327. Zbl0858.54008MR1307264
- Tkachuk V.V., Yaschenko I.V., Almost closed sets and topologies they determine, Comment. Math. Univ. Carolin. 42 (2001), no. 2, 395–405. Zbl1053.54004MR1832158
- Whyburn G.T., 10.1090/S0002-9939-1970-0248722-0, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 24 (1970), no. 1, 181–185. Zbl0197.48602MR0248722DOI10.1090/S0002-9939-1970-0248722-0
- Wilansky A., Between ${T}_{1}$ and ${T}_{2}$, Amer. Math. Monthly 74 (1967), no. 3, 261–266. MR0208557

## NotesEmbed ?

topTo embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.