Semicontinuity of dimension and measure for locally scaling fractals

L. B. Jonker; J. J. P. Veerman

Fundamenta Mathematicae (2002)

  • Volume: 173, Issue: 2, page 113-131
  • ISSN: 0016-2736

Abstract

top
The basic question of this paper is: If you consider two iterated function systems close to each other in an appropriate topology, are the dimensions of their respective invariant sets close to each other? It is well known that the Hausdorff dimension (and Lebesgue measure) of the invariant set does not depend continuously on the iterated function system. Our main result is that (with a restriction on the "non-conformality" of the transformations) the Hausdorff dimension is a lower semicontinuous function in the C¹-topology of the transformations of the iterated function system. The same question is raised of the Lebesgue measure of the invariant set. Here we show that it is an upper semicontinuous function of the transformations. We also include some corollaries of these results, such as the equality of box and Hausdorff dimensions in these cases.

How to cite

top

L. B. Jonker, and J. J. P. Veerman. "Semicontinuity of dimension and measure for locally scaling fractals." Fundamenta Mathematicae 173.2 (2002): 113-131. <http://eudml.org/doc/283070>.

@article{L2002,
abstract = {The basic question of this paper is: If you consider two iterated function systems close to each other in an appropriate topology, are the dimensions of their respective invariant sets close to each other? It is well known that the Hausdorff dimension (and Lebesgue measure) of the invariant set does not depend continuously on the iterated function system. Our main result is that (with a restriction on the "non-conformality" of the transformations) the Hausdorff dimension is a lower semicontinuous function in the C¹-topology of the transformations of the iterated function system. The same question is raised of the Lebesgue measure of the invariant set. Here we show that it is an upper semicontinuous function of the transformations. We also include some corollaries of these results, such as the equality of box and Hausdorff dimensions in these cases.},
author = {L. B. Jonker, J. J. P. Veerman},
journal = {Fundamenta Mathematicae},
keywords = {box dimension; fractals; IFS; dimension; iterated function system},
language = {eng},
number = {2},
pages = {113-131},
title = {Semicontinuity of dimension and measure for locally scaling fractals},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/283070},
volume = {173},
year = {2002},
}

TY - JOUR
AU - L. B. Jonker
AU - J. J. P. Veerman
TI - Semicontinuity of dimension and measure for locally scaling fractals
JO - Fundamenta Mathematicae
PY - 2002
VL - 173
IS - 2
SP - 113
EP - 131
AB - The basic question of this paper is: If you consider two iterated function systems close to each other in an appropriate topology, are the dimensions of their respective invariant sets close to each other? It is well known that the Hausdorff dimension (and Lebesgue measure) of the invariant set does not depend continuously on the iterated function system. Our main result is that (with a restriction on the "non-conformality" of the transformations) the Hausdorff dimension is a lower semicontinuous function in the C¹-topology of the transformations of the iterated function system. The same question is raised of the Lebesgue measure of the invariant set. Here we show that it is an upper semicontinuous function of the transformations. We also include some corollaries of these results, such as the equality of box and Hausdorff dimensions in these cases.
LA - eng
KW - box dimension; fractals; IFS; dimension; iterated function system
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/283070
ER -

NotesEmbed ?

top

You must be logged in to post comments.

To embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.

Only the controls for the widget will be shown in your chosen language. Notes will be shown in their authored language.

Tells the widget how many notes to show per page. You can cycle through additional notes using the next and previous controls.

    
                

Note: Best practice suggests putting the JavaScript code just before the closing </body> tag.