Lattice copies of c₀ and in spaces of integrable functions for a vector measure

S. Okada; W. J. Ricker; E. A. Sánchez Pérez

  • 2014

Abstract

top
The spaces L¹(m) of all m-integrable (resp. L ¹ w ( m ) of all scalarly m-integrable) functions for a vector measure m, taking values in a complex locally convex Hausdorff space X (briefly, lcHs), are themselves lcHs for the mean convergence topology. Additionally, L ¹ w ( m ) is always a complex vector lattice; this is not necessarily so for L¹(m). To identify precisely when L¹(m) is also a complex vector lattice is one of our central aims. Whenever X is sequentially complete, then this is the case. If, additionally, the inclusion L ¹ ( m ) L ¹ w ( m ) (which always holds) is proper, then L¹(m) and L ¹ w ( m ) contain lattice-isomorphic copies of the complex Banach lattices c₀ and , respectively. On the other hand, whenever L¹(m) contains an isomorphic copy of c₀, merely in the lcHs sense, then necessarily L ¹ ( m ) L ¹ w ( m ) . Moreover, the X-valued integration operator Iₘ: f ↦ ∫ fdm, for f ∈ L¹(m), then fixes a copy of c₀. For X a Banach space, the validity of L ¹ ( m ) = L ¹ w ( m ) turns out to be equivalent to Iₘ being weakly completely continuous. A sufficient condition for this is the (q,1)-concavity of Iₘ for some 1 ≤ q < ∞. This criterion is fulfilled when Iₘ belongs to various classical operator ideals. Unlike for L ¹ w ( m ) , the space L¹(m) can never contain an isomorphic copy of . A rich supply of examples and counterexamples is presented. The methods involved are a hybrid of vector measure/integration theory, functional analysis, operator theory and complex vector lattices.

How to cite

top

S. Okada, W. J. Ricker, and E. A. Sánchez Pérez. Lattice copies of c₀ and $ℓ^{∞}$ in spaces of integrable functions for a vector measure. 2014. <http://eudml.org/doc/286055>.

@book{S2014,
abstract = {The spaces L¹(m) of all m-integrable (resp. $L¹_\{w\}(m)$ of all scalarly m-integrable) functions for a vector measure m, taking values in a complex locally convex Hausdorff space X (briefly, lcHs), are themselves lcHs for the mean convergence topology. Additionally, $L¹_\{w\}(m)$ is always a complex vector lattice; this is not necessarily so for L¹(m). To identify precisely when L¹(m) is also a complex vector lattice is one of our central aims. Whenever X is sequentially complete, then this is the case. If, additionally, the inclusion $L¹(m) ⊆ L¹_\{w\}(m)$ (which always holds) is proper, then L¹(m) and $L¹_\{w\}(m)$ contain lattice-isomorphic copies of the complex Banach lattices c₀ and $ℓ^∞$, respectively. On the other hand, whenever L¹(m) contains an isomorphic copy of c₀, merely in the lcHs sense, then necessarily $L¹(m) ⊊ L¹_\{w\}(m)$. Moreover, the X-valued integration operator Iₘ: f ↦ ∫ fdm, for f ∈ L¹(m), then fixes a copy of c₀. For X a Banach space, the validity of $L¹(m) = L¹_\{w\}(m)$ turns out to be equivalent to Iₘ being weakly completely continuous. A sufficient condition for this is the (q,1)-concavity of Iₘ for some 1 ≤ q < ∞. This criterion is fulfilled when Iₘ belongs to various classical operator ideals. Unlike for $L¹_\{w\}(m)$, the space L¹(m) can never contain an isomorphic copy of $ℓ^\{∞\}$. A rich supply of examples and counterexamples is presented. The methods involved are a hybrid of vector measure/integration theory, functional analysis, operator theory and complex vector lattices.},
author = {S. Okada, W. J. Ricker, E. A. Sánchez Pérez},
keywords = {vector measure; space of integrable functions; locally convex space; complex vector lattice; operator ideal vector measure; space of integrable functions; integration operator},
language = {eng},
title = {Lattice copies of c₀ and $ℓ^\{∞\}$ in spaces of integrable functions for a vector measure},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/286055},
year = {2014},
}

TY - BOOK
AU - S. Okada
AU - W. J. Ricker
AU - E. A. Sánchez Pérez
TI - Lattice copies of c₀ and $ℓ^{∞}$ in spaces of integrable functions for a vector measure
PY - 2014
AB - The spaces L¹(m) of all m-integrable (resp. $L¹_{w}(m)$ of all scalarly m-integrable) functions for a vector measure m, taking values in a complex locally convex Hausdorff space X (briefly, lcHs), are themselves lcHs for the mean convergence topology. Additionally, $L¹_{w}(m)$ is always a complex vector lattice; this is not necessarily so for L¹(m). To identify precisely when L¹(m) is also a complex vector lattice is one of our central aims. Whenever X is sequentially complete, then this is the case. If, additionally, the inclusion $L¹(m) ⊆ L¹_{w}(m)$ (which always holds) is proper, then L¹(m) and $L¹_{w}(m)$ contain lattice-isomorphic copies of the complex Banach lattices c₀ and $ℓ^∞$, respectively. On the other hand, whenever L¹(m) contains an isomorphic copy of c₀, merely in the lcHs sense, then necessarily $L¹(m) ⊊ L¹_{w}(m)$. Moreover, the X-valued integration operator Iₘ: f ↦ ∫ fdm, for f ∈ L¹(m), then fixes a copy of c₀. For X a Banach space, the validity of $L¹(m) = L¹_{w}(m)$ turns out to be equivalent to Iₘ being weakly completely continuous. A sufficient condition for this is the (q,1)-concavity of Iₘ for some 1 ≤ q < ∞. This criterion is fulfilled when Iₘ belongs to various classical operator ideals. Unlike for $L¹_{w}(m)$, the space L¹(m) can never contain an isomorphic copy of $ℓ^{∞}$. A rich supply of examples and counterexamples is presented. The methods involved are a hybrid of vector measure/integration theory, functional analysis, operator theory and complex vector lattices.
LA - eng
KW - vector measure; space of integrable functions; locally convex space; complex vector lattice; operator ideal vector measure; space of integrable functions; integration operator
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/286055
ER -

NotesEmbed ?

top

You must be logged in to post comments.

To embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.

Only the controls for the widget will be shown in your chosen language. Notes will be shown in their authored language.

Tells the widget how many notes to show per page. You can cycle through additional notes using the next and previous controls.

    
                

Note: Best practice suggests putting the JavaScript code just before the closing </body> tag.