Klaus Denecke, and Bundit Pibaljommee. "Locally finite M-solid varieties of semigroups." Discussiones Mathematicae - General Algebra and Applications 23.2 (2003): 139-148. <http://eudml.org/doc/287680>.
@article{KlausDenecke2003,
abstract = {An algebra of type τ is said to be locally finite if all its finitely generated subalgebras are finite. A class K of algebras of type τ is called locally finite if all its elements are locally finite. It is well-known (see [2]) that a variety of algebras of the same type τ is locally finite iff all its finitely generated free algebras are finite. A variety V is finitely based if it admits a finite basis of identities, i.e. if there is a finite set σ of identities such that V = ModΣ, the class of all algebras of type τ which satisfy all identities from Σ. Every variety which is generated by a finite algebra is locally finite. But there are finite algebras which are not finitely based. For semigroup varieties, Perkins proved that the variety generated by the five-element Brandt-semigroup $B¹₂ = \{ \begin\{pmatrix\} 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0\end\{pmatrix\}, \begin\{pmatrix\} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0\end\{pmatrix\}, \begin\{pmatrix\} 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0\end\{pmatrix\}, \begin\{pmatrix\} 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 0\end\{pmatrix\}, \begin\{pmatrix\} 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1\end\{pmatrix\}\}$ is not finitely based ([9], [10]). An identity s ≈ t is called a hyperidentity of a variety V if whenever the operation symbols occurring in s and in t, respectively, are replaced by any terms of V of the appropriate arity, the identity which results, holds in V. A variety V is called solid if every identity of V also holds as a hyperidentity in V. If we apply only substitutions from a set M we speak of M-hyperidentities and M-solid varieties. In this paper we use the theory of M-solid varieties to prove that a type (2) M-solid variety of the form $V = H_\{M\}Mod\{F(x₁,F(x₂,x₃)) ≈ F(F(x₁,x₂),x₃)\}$, which consists precisely of all algebras which satisfy the associative law as an M -hyperidentity is locally finite iff the hypersubstitution which maps F to the word x₁x₂x₁ or to the word x₂x₁x₂ belongs to M and that V is finitely based if it is locally finite.},
author = {Klaus Denecke, Bundit Pibaljommee},
journal = {Discussiones Mathematicae - General Algebra and Applications},
keywords = {locally finite variety; finitely based variety; M-solidvariety; semigroup variety; hypersubstitution; hyperidentity; -solid variety},
language = {eng},
number = {2},
pages = {139-148},
title = {Locally finite M-solid varieties of semigroups},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/287680},
volume = {23},
year = {2003},
}
TY - JOUR
AU - Klaus Denecke
AU - Bundit Pibaljommee
TI - Locally finite M-solid varieties of semigroups
JO - Discussiones Mathematicae - General Algebra and Applications
PY - 2003
VL - 23
IS - 2
SP - 139
EP - 148
AB - An algebra of type τ is said to be locally finite if all its finitely generated subalgebras are finite. A class K of algebras of type τ is called locally finite if all its elements are locally finite. It is well-known (see [2]) that a variety of algebras of the same type τ is locally finite iff all its finitely generated free algebras are finite. A variety V is finitely based if it admits a finite basis of identities, i.e. if there is a finite set σ of identities such that V = ModΣ, the class of all algebras of type τ which satisfy all identities from Σ. Every variety which is generated by a finite algebra is locally finite. But there are finite algebras which are not finitely based. For semigroup varieties, Perkins proved that the variety generated by the five-element Brandt-semigroup $B¹₂ = { \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0\end{pmatrix}, \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0\end{pmatrix}, \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0\end{pmatrix}, \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 0\end{pmatrix}, \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1\end{pmatrix}}$ is not finitely based ([9], [10]). An identity s ≈ t is called a hyperidentity of a variety V if whenever the operation symbols occurring in s and in t, respectively, are replaced by any terms of V of the appropriate arity, the identity which results, holds in V. A variety V is called solid if every identity of V also holds as a hyperidentity in V. If we apply only substitutions from a set M we speak of M-hyperidentities and M-solid varieties. In this paper we use the theory of M-solid varieties to prove that a type (2) M-solid variety of the form $V = H_{M}Mod{F(x₁,F(x₂,x₃)) ≈ F(F(x₁,x₂),x₃)}$, which consists precisely of all algebras which satisfy the associative law as an M -hyperidentity is locally finite iff the hypersubstitution which maps F to the word x₁x₂x₁ or to the word x₂x₁x₂ belongs to M and that V is finitely based if it is locally finite.
LA - eng
KW - locally finite variety; finitely based variety; M-solidvariety; semigroup variety; hypersubstitution; hyperidentity; -solid variety
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/287680
ER -
