Stationarity and invertibility of a dynamic correlation matrix
Kybernetika (2018)
- Volume: 54, Issue: 2, page 363-374
- ISSN: 0023-5954
Access Full Article
topAbstract
topHow to cite
topMcAleer, Michael. "Stationarity and invertibility of a dynamic correlation matrix." Kybernetika 54.2 (2018): 363-374. <http://eudml.org/doc/294253>.
@article{McAleer2018,
abstract = {One of the most widely-used multivariate conditional volatility models is the dynamic conditional correlation (or DCC) specification. However, the underlying stochastic process to derive DCC has not yet been established, which has made problematic the derivation of asymptotic properties of the Quasi-Maximum Likelihood Estimators (QMLE). To date, the statistical properties of the QMLE of the DCC parameters have purportedly been derived under highly restrictive and unverifiable regularity conditions. The paper shows that the DCC model can be obtained from a vector random coefficient moving average process, and derives the stationarity and invertibility conditions of the DCC model. The derivation of DCC from a vector random coefficient moving average process raises three important issues, as follows: (i) demonstrates that DCC is, in fact, a dynamic conditional covariance model of the returns shocks rather than a dynamic conditional correlation model; (ii) provides the motivation, which is presently missing, for standardization of the conditional covariance model to obtain the conditional correlation model; and (iii) shows that the appropriate ARCH or GARCH model for DCC is based on the standardized shocks rather than the returns shocks. The derivation of the regularity conditions, especially stationarity and invertibility, may subsequently lead to a solid statistical foundation for the estimates of the DCC parameters. Several new results are also derived for univariate models, including a novel conditional volatility model expressed in terms of standardized shocks rather than returns shocks, as well as the associated stationarity and invertibility conditions.},
author = {McAleer, Michael},
journal = {Kybernetika},
keywords = {dynamic conditional correlation; dynamic conditional covariance; vector random coefficient moving average; stationarity; invertibility; asymptotic properties},
language = {eng},
number = {2},
pages = {363-374},
publisher = {Institute of Information Theory and Automation AS CR},
title = {Stationarity and invertibility of a dynamic correlation matrix},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/294253},
volume = {54},
year = {2018},
}
TY - JOUR
AU - McAleer, Michael
TI - Stationarity and invertibility of a dynamic correlation matrix
JO - Kybernetika
PY - 2018
PB - Institute of Information Theory and Automation AS CR
VL - 54
IS - 2
SP - 363
EP - 374
AB - One of the most widely-used multivariate conditional volatility models is the dynamic conditional correlation (or DCC) specification. However, the underlying stochastic process to derive DCC has not yet been established, which has made problematic the derivation of asymptotic properties of the Quasi-Maximum Likelihood Estimators (QMLE). To date, the statistical properties of the QMLE of the DCC parameters have purportedly been derived under highly restrictive and unverifiable regularity conditions. The paper shows that the DCC model can be obtained from a vector random coefficient moving average process, and derives the stationarity and invertibility conditions of the DCC model. The derivation of DCC from a vector random coefficient moving average process raises three important issues, as follows: (i) demonstrates that DCC is, in fact, a dynamic conditional covariance model of the returns shocks rather than a dynamic conditional correlation model; (ii) provides the motivation, which is presently missing, for standardization of the conditional covariance model to obtain the conditional correlation model; and (iii) shows that the appropriate ARCH or GARCH model for DCC is based on the standardized shocks rather than the returns shocks. The derivation of the regularity conditions, especially stationarity and invertibility, may subsequently lead to a solid statistical foundation for the estimates of the DCC parameters. Several new results are also derived for univariate models, including a novel conditional volatility model expressed in terms of standardized shocks rather than returns shocks, as well as the associated stationarity and invertibility conditions.
LA - eng
KW - dynamic conditional correlation; dynamic conditional covariance; vector random coefficient moving average; stationarity; invertibility; asymptotic properties
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/294253
ER -
References
top- Aielli, G. P., 10.1080/07350015.2013.771027, J. Business Econom. Statist. 31 (2013), 282-299. MR3173682DOI10.1080/07350015.2013.771027
- Amemiya, T., Advanced Econometrics., Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1985.
- Baba, Y., Engle, R. F., Kraft, D., Kroner, K. F., Multivariate simultaneous generalized ARCH., Unpublished manuscript, Department of Economics, University of California, San Diego 1985, (the published version is given in Engle and Kroner [16]). MR1325104
- Bollerslev, T., 10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1, J. Econometr. 31 (1986), 307-327. MR0853051DOI10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1
- Caporin, M., McAleer, M., 10.3390/econometrics1010115, Econometrics 1 (2013), 1, 115-126. DOI10.3390/econometrics1010115
- Chang, C.-L., McAleer, M., 10.3390/econometrics5010015, Econometrics 5 (2017), 1, 5 pp. DOI10.3390/econometrics5010015
- Chang, C.-L., McAleer, M., Tansuchat, R., 10.2139/ssrn.1401331, J. Energy Markets 2 (2009/10), 4, 1-23. DOI10.2139/ssrn.1401331
- Chang, C.-L., McAleer, M., Tansuchat, R., 10.1016/j.eneco.2010.04.014, Energy Economics 32 (2010), 1445-1455. DOI10.1016/j.eneco.2010.04.014
- Chang, C.-L., McAleer, M., Tansuchat, R., 10.1016/j.eneco.2011.01.009, Energy Economics 33 (2011), 5, 912-923. DOI10.1016/j.eneco.2011.01.009
- Chang, C.-L., McAleer, M., Tansuchat, R., 10.1016/j.najef.2012.06.002, North Amer. J. Econom. Finance 25 (2013), 116-138. DOI10.1016/j.najef.2012.06.002
- Chang, C.-L., McAleer, M., Wang, Y.-A., 10.1016/j.rser.2017.07.024, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 81 (2018), 1, 1002-1018. DOI10.1016/j.rser.2017.07.024
- Chang, C.-L., McAleer, M., Zuo, G. D., 10.3390/su9101789, Sustainability 9 (2017), 10, p. 1789, 1-22. DOI10.3390/su9101789
- Duan, J.-C., 10.1016/s0304-4076(97)00009-2, J. Econometrics 79 (1997), 97-127. MR1457699DOI10.1016/s0304-4076(97)00009-2
- Engle, R. F., 10.2307/1912773, Econometrica 50 (1982), 987-1007. MR0666121DOI10.2307/1912773
- Engle, R. F., 10.1198/073500102288618487, J. Business Econom. Statist. 20 (2002), 339-350. MR1939905DOI10.1198/073500102288618487
- Engle, R. F., Kroner, K. F., 10.1017/s0266466600009063, Econometr. Theory 11 (1995), 122-150. MR1325104DOI10.1017/s0266466600009063
- Hentschel, L., 10.1016/0304-405x(94)00821-h, J. Financial Economics 39 (1995), 71-104. DOI10.1016/0304-405x(94)00821-h
- Jeantheau, T., 10.1017/s0266466698141038, Econometr. Theory 14 (1998), 70-86. MR1613694DOI10.1017/s0266466698141038
- Ling, S., McAleer, M., , Econometr. Theory 19 (2003), 280-310. MR1966031DOI
- Marek, T., On invertibility of a random coefficient moving average model., Kybernetika 41 (2005), 01, 743-756. MR2193863
- McAleer, M., Chan, F., Hoti, S., Lieberman, O., 10.1017/s0266466608080614, Econometr. Theory 24 (2008), 6, 1554-1583. MR2456538DOI10.1017/s0266466608080614
- Tsay, R. S., 10.2307/2289470, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 82 (1987), 590-604. MR0898364DOI10.2307/2289470
- Tse, Y. K., Tsui, A. K. C., 10.1198/073500102288618496, J. Business Econom. Statist. 20 (2002), 351-362. MR1939906DOI10.1198/073500102288618496
NotesEmbed ?
topTo embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.