Geodesically equivalent metrics on homogenous spaces

Neda Bokan; Tijana Šukilović; Srdjan Vukmirović

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal (2019)

  • Volume: 69, Issue: 4, page 945-954
  • ISSN: 0011-4642

Abstract

top
Two metrics on a manifold are geodesically equivalent if the sets of their unparameterized geodesics coincide. We show that if two G -invariant metrics of arbitrary signature on homogenous space G / H are geodesically equivalent, they are affinely equivalent, i.e. they have the same Levi-Civita connection. We also prove that the existence of nonproportional, geodesically equivalent, G -invariant metrics on homogenous space G / H implies that their holonomy algebra cannot be full. We give an algorithm for finding all left invariant metrics geodesically equivalent to a given left invariant metric on a Lie group. Using that algorithm we prove that no two left invariant metrics of any signature on sphere S 3 are geodesically equivalent. However, we present examples of Lie groups that admit geodesically equivalent, nonproportional, left-invariant metrics.

How to cite

top

Bokan, Neda, Šukilović, Tijana, and Vukmirović, Srdjan. "Geodesically equivalent metrics on homogenous spaces." Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal 69.4 (2019): 945-954. <http://eudml.org/doc/294279>.

@article{Bokan2019,
abstract = {Two metrics on a manifold are geodesically equivalent if the sets of their unparameterized geodesics coincide. We show that if two $G$-invariant metrics of arbitrary signature on homogenous space $G/H$ are geodesically equivalent, they are affinely equivalent, i.e. they have the same Levi-Civita connection. We also prove that the existence of nonproportional, geodesically equivalent, $G$-invariant metrics on homogenous space $G/H$ implies that their holonomy algebra cannot be full. We give an algorithm for finding all left invariant metrics geodesically equivalent to a given left invariant metric on a Lie group. Using that algorithm we prove that no two left invariant metrics of any signature on sphere $S^3$ are geodesically equivalent. However, we present examples of Lie groups that admit geodesically equivalent, nonproportional, left-invariant metrics.},
author = {Bokan, Neda, Šukilović, Tijana, Vukmirović, Srdjan},
journal = {Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal},
keywords = {invariant metric; geodesically equivalent metric; affinely equivalent metric},
language = {eng},
number = {4},
pages = {945-954},
publisher = {Institute of Mathematics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic},
title = {Geodesically equivalent metrics on homogenous spaces},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/294279},
volume = {69},
year = {2019},
}

TY - JOUR
AU - Bokan, Neda
AU - Šukilović, Tijana
AU - Vukmirović, Srdjan
TI - Geodesically equivalent metrics on homogenous spaces
JO - Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal
PY - 2019
PB - Institute of Mathematics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic
VL - 69
IS - 4
SP - 945
EP - 954
AB - Two metrics on a manifold are geodesically equivalent if the sets of their unparameterized geodesics coincide. We show that if two $G$-invariant metrics of arbitrary signature on homogenous space $G/H$ are geodesically equivalent, they are affinely equivalent, i.e. they have the same Levi-Civita connection. We also prove that the existence of nonproportional, geodesically equivalent, $G$-invariant metrics on homogenous space $G/H$ implies that their holonomy algebra cannot be full. We give an algorithm for finding all left invariant metrics geodesically equivalent to a given left invariant metric on a Lie group. Using that algorithm we prove that no two left invariant metrics of any signature on sphere $S^3$ are geodesically equivalent. However, we present examples of Lie groups that admit geodesically equivalent, nonproportional, left-invariant metrics.
LA - eng
KW - invariant metric; geodesically equivalent metric; affinely equivalent metric
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/294279
ER -

References

top
  1. Bokan, N., Šukilović, T., Vukmirović, S., 10.1007/s10711-014-9980-4, Geom. Dedicata 177 (2015), 83-102. (2015) Zbl1326.53065MR3370025DOI10.1007/s10711-014-9980-4
  2. Bolsinov, A. V., Kiosak, V., Matveev, V. S., 10.1112/jlms/jdp032, J. Lond. Math. Soc., II. Ser. 80 (2009), 341-356. (2009) Zbl1175.53022MR2545256DOI10.1112/jlms/jdp032
  3. Eisenhart, L. P., 10.1090/S0002-9947-1923-1501245-6, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 25 (1923), 297-306 9999JFM99999 49.0539.01. (1923) MR1501245DOI10.1090/S0002-9947-1923-1501245-6
  4. Hall, G. S., Lonie, D. P., 10.1088/0264-9381/17/6/304, Classical Quantum Gravity 17 (2000), 1369-1382. (2000) Zbl0957.83014MR1752641DOI10.1088/0264-9381/17/6/304
  5. Hall, G. S., Lonie, D. P., 10.1016/j.geomphys.2010.10.007, J. Geom. Phys. 61 (2011), 381-399. (2011) Zbl1208.83035MR2746125DOI10.1016/j.geomphys.2010.10.007
  6. Kiosak, V., Matveev, V. S., 10.1007/s00220-008-0719-7, Commun. Math. Phys. 289 (2009), 383-400. (2009) Zbl1170.53025MR2504854DOI10.1007/s00220-008-0719-7
  7. Kiosak, V., Matveev, V. S., 10.1007/s00220-010-1037-4, Commun. Math. Phys. 297 (2010), 401-426. (2010) Zbl1197.53055MR2651904DOI10.1007/s00220-010-1037-4
  8. Levi-Civita, T., 10.1007/BF02419530, Annali di Mat. 24 Italian (1896), 255-300 9999JFM99999 27.0603.04. (1896) MR2551879DOI10.1007/BF02419530
  9. Sinyukov, N. S., On geodesic mappings of Riemannian spaces onto symmetric Riemannian spaces, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, n. Ser. 98 (1954), 21-23 Russian. (1954) Zbl0056.15301MR0065994
  10. Topalov, P., 10.1023/A:1006369525091, Acta Appl. Math. 59 (1999), 271-298. (1999) Zbl0972.53048MR1744754DOI10.1023/A:1006369525091
  11. Wang, Z., Hall, G., 10.1016/j.geomphys.2012.12.004, J. Geom. Phys. 66 (2013), 37-49. (2013) Zbl1285.53014MR3019271DOI10.1016/j.geomphys.2012.12.004

NotesEmbed ?

top

You must be logged in to post comments.

To embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.

Only the controls for the widget will be shown in your chosen language. Notes will be shown in their authored language.

Tells the widget how many notes to show per page. You can cycle through additional notes using the next and previous controls.

    
                

Note: Best practice suggests putting the JavaScript code just before the closing </body> tag.