Parametric Identification of Sorensen model for glucose-insulin-carbohydrates dynamics using evolutive algorithms

Eduardo Ruiz Velázquez; Oscar D. Sánchez; Griselda Quiroz; Guillermo O. Pulido

Kybernetika (2018)

  • Volume: 54, Issue: 1, page 110-134
  • ISSN: 0023-5954

Abstract

top
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a disease affecting millions of people worldwide, and its medical care brings an economic wear to patients and public health systems. Many efforts have been made to deal with DM, one of them is the full-automation of insulin delivery. This idea consists in design a closed-loop control system to maintain blood glucose levels (BGL) within normal ranges. Dynamic models of glucose-insulin-carbohydrates play an important role in synthesis of control algorithms, but also in other aspects of DM care, such as testing glucose sensors, or as support systems for health care decisions. Therefore, there are several mathematical models reproducing glycemic dynamics of DM, most of them validated with nominal parameters of standardized patients. Nevertheless, individual patient-oriented models could open the possibility of having closed-loop personalized therapies. This problem can be addressed through the information provided by open-loop therapy based on continuous glucose monitoring and subcutaneous insulin infusion. This paper considers the problem of identifying particular parameters of a compartmental model of glucose-insulin dynamics in DM; the goal is fitting the model response to historical data of a diabetic patient collected during a time period of her/his daily life. At this time, Sorensen model is one of the most complete compartmental models representing the complex dynamics of the glucose-insulin metabolism. This is a system of 19 ordinary differential equations (ODEs), thus the identification of its parameters is a non-easy task. In this contribution, parameter identification was performed via three evolutionary algorithms: differential evolution, ant colony optimization and particle swarm optimization. The obtained results show that evolutionary algorithms are powerful tools to solve problems of parametric identification. Also, a comparative analysis of the three algorithms was realized throw a wilcoxon sign-rank test, in which colony optimization had the better performance. The model obtained with the estimated parameters could be used to in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) care, such as in the design of full-automation of insulin infusion.

How to cite

top

Ruiz Velázquez, Eduardo, et al. "Parametric Identification of Sorensen model for glucose-insulin-carbohydrates dynamics using evolutive algorithms." Kybernetika 54.1 (2018): 110-134. <http://eudml.org/doc/294512>.

@article{RuizVelázquez2018,
abstract = {Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a disease affecting millions of people worldwide, and its medical care brings an economic wear to patients and public health systems. Many efforts have been made to deal with DM, one of them is the full-automation of insulin delivery. This idea consists in design a closed-loop control system to maintain blood glucose levels (BGL) within normal ranges. Dynamic models of glucose-insulin-carbohydrates play an important role in synthesis of control algorithms, but also in other aspects of DM care, such as testing glucose sensors, or as support systems for health care decisions. Therefore, there are several mathematical models reproducing glycemic dynamics of DM, most of them validated with nominal parameters of standardized patients. Nevertheless, individual patient-oriented models could open the possibility of having closed-loop personalized therapies. This problem can be addressed through the information provided by open-loop therapy based on continuous glucose monitoring and subcutaneous insulin infusion. This paper considers the problem of identifying particular parameters of a compartmental model of glucose-insulin dynamics in DM; the goal is fitting the model response to historical data of a diabetic patient collected during a time period of her/his daily life. At this time, Sorensen model is one of the most complete compartmental models representing the complex dynamics of the glucose-insulin metabolism. This is a system of 19 ordinary differential equations (ODEs), thus the identification of its parameters is a non-easy task. In this contribution, parameter identification was performed via three evolutionary algorithms: differential evolution, ant colony optimization and particle swarm optimization. The obtained results show that evolutionary algorithms are powerful tools to solve problems of parametric identification. Also, a comparative analysis of the three algorithms was realized throw a wilcoxon sign-rank test, in which colony optimization had the better performance. The model obtained with the estimated parameters could be used to in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) care, such as in the design of full-automation of insulin infusion.},
author = {Ruiz Velázquez, Eduardo, Sánchez, Oscar D., Quiroz, Griselda, Pulido, Guillermo O.},
journal = {Kybernetika},
keywords = {dynamic model of insulin-glucose; identifiability; parameter estimation; evolutionary algorithms; differential evolution; ant colony optimization; particle swarm optimization},
language = {eng},
number = {1},
pages = {110-134},
publisher = {Institute of Information Theory and Automation AS CR},
title = {Parametric Identification of Sorensen model for glucose-insulin-carbohydrates dynamics using evolutive algorithms},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/294512},
volume = {54},
year = {2018},
}

TY - JOUR
AU - Ruiz Velázquez, Eduardo
AU - Sánchez, Oscar D.
AU - Quiroz, Griselda
AU - Pulido, Guillermo O.
TI - Parametric Identification of Sorensen model for glucose-insulin-carbohydrates dynamics using evolutive algorithms
JO - Kybernetika
PY - 2018
PB - Institute of Information Theory and Automation AS CR
VL - 54
IS - 1
SP - 110
EP - 134
AB - Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a disease affecting millions of people worldwide, and its medical care brings an economic wear to patients and public health systems. Many efforts have been made to deal with DM, one of them is the full-automation of insulin delivery. This idea consists in design a closed-loop control system to maintain blood glucose levels (BGL) within normal ranges. Dynamic models of glucose-insulin-carbohydrates play an important role in synthesis of control algorithms, but also in other aspects of DM care, such as testing glucose sensors, or as support systems for health care decisions. Therefore, there are several mathematical models reproducing glycemic dynamics of DM, most of them validated with nominal parameters of standardized patients. Nevertheless, individual patient-oriented models could open the possibility of having closed-loop personalized therapies. This problem can be addressed through the information provided by open-loop therapy based on continuous glucose monitoring and subcutaneous insulin infusion. This paper considers the problem of identifying particular parameters of a compartmental model of glucose-insulin dynamics in DM; the goal is fitting the model response to historical data of a diabetic patient collected during a time period of her/his daily life. At this time, Sorensen model is one of the most complete compartmental models representing the complex dynamics of the glucose-insulin metabolism. This is a system of 19 ordinary differential equations (ODEs), thus the identification of its parameters is a non-easy task. In this contribution, parameter identification was performed via three evolutionary algorithms: differential evolution, ant colony optimization and particle swarm optimization. The obtained results show that evolutionary algorithms are powerful tools to solve problems of parametric identification. Also, a comparative analysis of the three algorithms was realized throw a wilcoxon sign-rank test, in which colony optimization had the better performance. The model obtained with the estimated parameters could be used to in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) care, such as in the design of full-automation of insulin infusion.
LA - eng
KW - dynamic model of insulin-glucose; identifiability; parameter estimation; evolutionary algorithms; differential evolution; ant colony optimization; particle swarm optimization
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/294512
ER -

References

top
  1. Alaykiran, K., Engin, O., Karinca Kolonileri Metasezgiseli ve Gezgin Satici Problemleri Üzerinde Bir Uygulamasi., Gazi Üniv. Müh. Mim. Fak. Der. 20 (2005), 69-76. 
  2. Alaykoran, K., Engin, O., The American Heritage. Dictionary of the American Language., Gazi Üniv. Müh. Mim. Fak. Der. 20 (2005), 69-76. 
  3. Anguelova, M., Nonlinear Observability and Identifiability: General Theory and a Case Study of a Kinetic Model for S. cerevisiae., Department of Mathematics. Chalmers University of technology and Göteborg University SE-412 96, Göteborg 2004. 
  4. Balsa-Canto, E., 10.1186/1752-0509-4-11, BMC Systems Biology 4 (2010), 1, 4-11. DOI10.1186/1752-0509-4-11
  5. Berger, M., Rodbard, D., 10.2337/diacare.12.10.725, Diabetes Care 12 (1989), 10, 725-736. DOI10.2337/diacare.12.10.725
  6. Bergman, R. N., Ider, Y. Z., Bowden, C. R., Cobelli, C., Quantitative estimation of insulin sensitivity., Amer. J. Physiology 236 (1979), 6, E667-E677. 
  7. Chee, F., Fernando, T., 10.1007/978-3-540-74031-5, Springer 368, Berlin, Heidlberg 2007. MR2354809DOI10.1007/978-3-540-74031-5
  8. Chis, O. T., Banga, J. R., Balsa-Canto, E., 10.1371/journal.pone.0027755, PLos One 6 (2011), 11, e27755. DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0027755
  9. Chis, O., Banga, J. R., Balsa-Canto, E., 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr431, Bioinformatics 27 (2011), 18, 2610-2611. DOI10.1093/bioinformatics/btr431
  10. Cobelli, C., Man, C. Dalla, Sparacino, G., Magni, L., Nicolao, G. de, Kovatchev, B., 10.1109/rbme.2009.2036073, IEEE Rev. Biomed. Engrg. 2 (2009), 54-96. DOI10.1109/rbme.2009.2036073
  11. Colmegna, P., Peña, R. S. Sanchez, 10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.09.020, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 113 (2014), 371-382. DOI10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.09.020
  12. Colorni, A., Dorigo, M., Maniezzo, V., Distributed Optimization by Ant Colonies. In: The First European Conference on Artificial Life., Paris 1992. 
  13. Das, T. K., Venayagamoorthy, G. K., Aliyu, U. O., 10.1109/tia.2008.2002171, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 44 (2008), 5, 1445-1457. DOI10.1109/tia.2008.2002171
  14. Davson, H., Spaziani, E., 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006330, J. Physiology 149 (1959), 1, 135-143. DOI10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006330
  15. Valle, Y. del, Venayagamoorthy, G. K., Mohagheghi, S., Hernandez, J.-C., Harley, R. G., 10.1109/tevc.2007.896686, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 12 (2008), 2, 171-195. DOI10.1109/tevc.2007.896686
  16. Dikondwar, S.-R., 10.1109/iccsn.2011.6014636, In: Communication Software and Networks (ICCSN), IEEE 3rd International Conference 2011, pp. 575-579. DOI10.1109/iccsn.2011.6014636
  17. Eberhart, R. C., Kennedy, J., A new optimizer using particle swarm theory., In: Proc. 6th Int. Symp. Micromachine Hum. Sci. 1995, pp. 39-43. 
  18. Ergüzel, T., Akbay, E., ACO (Ant Colony Optimization) Algoritmasi ile Yrnge Takibi., Izmit, Kocaeli 2007. 
  19. Femat, R., Ruiz-Velázquez, E., Quiroz, G., 10.1109/tase.2008.2009089, IEEE Trans. Automat. Sci. Engrg. 6 (2009), 2, 239-247. DOI10.1109/tase.2008.2009089
  20. Garcia, S., Molina, D., Lozano, M., Herrera, F., 10.1007/s10732-008-9080-4, Springer Science Business Media, J Heuristics 15 (2008), 617-644. DOI10.1007/s10732-008-9080-4
  21. Gómez, E. J., Thomas, M. E. Hernando Pérez y, 10.1109/titb.2007.902162, IEEE Trans. Inform. Technol. Biomedicine 12 (2008), 4, 470-479. DOI10.1109/titb.2007.902162
  22. Guyton, J. R., 10.2337/diabetes.27.10.1027, Diabetes (1978), 1027-1042. DOI10.2337/diabetes.27.10.1027
  23. Haidar, A., Wilinska, E. M., Graveston, J. A., Hovorka, R., 10.1109/tbme.2013.2272736, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engrg. 60 (2013), 12, 3524-3533. DOI10.1109/tbme.2013.2272736
  24. Harvey, R. A., Wang, Y., Grosman, B., Percival, M. W., Bevier, W., Finan, D. A., Zisser, H., Sebong, D. E., Jovanovic, L., III, F. J. Doyle, Dassau, E., 10.1109/memb.2009.935711, In: IEEE Engrg. Medicine Biol. Magazine 29 (2010), 2, 53-62. DOI10.1109/memb.2009.935711
  25. Hovorka, R., Shojaee-Moradie, F., Carroll, P. V., Chassin, L. J., Gowrie, I. J., Jackson, N. C., Tudor, R. S., Umpleby, A. M., Jones, R. H., 10.1152/ajpendo.00304.2001, Amer. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metabol. 282 (2002), 5, E992-E1007. DOI10.1152/ajpendo.00304.2001
  26. Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R. C., 10.1109/icnn.1995.488968, In: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Neural Netw. 1995, pp. 1942-1948. DOI10.1109/icnn.1995.488968
  27. Lehmann, E. D., Deutsch, T., 10.1016/0141-5425(92)90058-s, J. Biomedical Engrg. 14 (1992), 235-242. DOI10.1016/0141-5425(92)90058-s
  28. Lin, H. S., Liauh, W. H., Ho, S. J., 10.1109/tsmca.2007.914796, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. B 38 (2008), 2, 288-289. DOI10.1109/tsmca.2007.914796
  29. Man, C., Rizza, R., Cobelli, 10.1109/tbme.2007.893506, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engrg. 54 (2007), 10, 1740-1749. DOI10.1109/tbme.2007.893506
  30. Pedersen, M. G., Toffolo, G. M., Cobelli, 10.1152/ajpendo.00670.2009, Amer. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metabol. 298 (2010), E597-E601. DOI10.1152/ajpendo.00670.2009
  31. Peng, B., Liu, B., Zhang, F., Wang, L., 10.1016/j.chaos.2007.06.084, Chaos, Solitons Fractals 39 (2009), 2110-2118. DOI10.1016/j.chaos.2007.06.084
  32. Quiroz, G., Femat, R., 10.1016/j.mbs.2007.06.004, Math. Biosciences 210 (2007), 554-575. DOI10.1016/j.mbs.2007.06.004
  33. Respondek, W., Geometry of static and dynamic feedback., In: Lectures given at the Summer School on Mathematics Control Theory, Trieste 2001 and Bedlewo-Warsaw 2002, Laboratoire de Mathématiques INSA, Rouen. MR1971960
  34. Sorensen, J. T., A Physiology Model of Glucose Metabolism in Man And Its Use to Design and Asses Improved Insulin Therapies for Diabetes., Ph.D. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1985. 
  35. Tiran, J., Galle, K. R., Porte, Jr., 10.1007/bf02584487, Ann. Biomedical Engrg. 3 (1975), 34-46. DOI10.1007/bf02584487
  36. Tuch, B., Dunlop, M., Research, J. Proietto. Diabetes, A guide for Postgraduates., Taylor and Francis e-Library, 2004. 
  37. Visentin, R., Man, C. Dalla, Cobelli, C., 10.1109/tbme.2016.2535241, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engrg. 63 (2016), 11, 2416-2424. DOI10.1109/tbme.2016.2535241
  38. Wachowiak, M. P., Smolikova, R., Zheng, Y., Zurada, J. M., Elmaghraby, A. S., 10.1109/tevc.2004.826068, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 8 (2004), 3, 289-301. DOI10.1109/tevc.2004.826068
  39. Wilinska, M. E., Hovorka, R., 10.1016/j.ddmod.2009.07.005, Drug Discov, Today Dis. 5 (2008), 289-298. DOI10.1016/j.ddmod.2009.07.005
  40. Organization, World Health, Global Report in Diabetes., Printed in France, 2016. 
  41. Zhan, C., Situ, W., Yeung, L. Fat, Tsang, P. Wai-Ming, YANG, G., 10.1109/tcbb.2014.2322360, IEEE Trans. Computat. Biology Biomath. 11 (2014), 1066-1076. DOI10.1109/tcbb.2014.2322360

NotesEmbed ?

top

You must be logged in to post comments.