A new indirect adaptive pole placer for possibly non-minimum phase MIMO linear systems

Kostas G. Arvanitis; Grigoris Kalogeropoulos; I. K. Kookos

Kybernetika (2000)

  • Volume: 36, Issue: 5, page [497]-529
  • ISSN: 0023-5954

Abstract

top
The use of generalized sampled-data hold functions, in order to synthesize adaptive pole placers for linear multiple-input, multiple-output systems with unknown parameters, is investigated in this paper, for the first time. Such a control scheme relies on a periodically varying controller, which suitably modulates the sampled outputs of the controlled plant. The proposed control strategy allows us to assign the poles of the sampled closed-loop system arbitrarily in desired locations, and does not make assumptions on the plant other than controllability and observability of the continuous and the sampled system, and the knowledge of a set of structural indices, namely the locally minimum controllability indices of the continuous-time plant. The indirect adaptive control scheme presented here, estimates the unknown plant parameters (and hence the parameters of the desired modulating matrix function) on line, from sequential data of the inputs and the outputs of the plant, which are recursively updated within the time limit imposed by a fundamental sampling period T 0 . The controller determination is based on the transformation of the discrete analogue of the system under control to a phase-variable canonical form, prior to the application of the control design procedure. The solution of the problem can, then, be obtained by a quite simple utilization of the concept of state similarity transformation, whereas known indirect adaptive pole placement techniques require the solution of matrix polynomial Diophantine equations. Moreover, in many cases, the solution of the Diophantine equation for a desired set of closed-loop eigenvalues might yield an unstable controller, and the overall adaptive pole placement scheme is then unstable with unstable compensators because their outputs are unbounded. The proposed strategy avoids these problems, since here gain controllers are essentially needed to be designed. Moreover, persistency of excitation and, therefore, parameter convergence, of the continuous-time plant is provided without making assumptions either on the existence of specific convex sets in which the estimated parameters belong or on the coprimeness of the polynomials describing the ARMA model, or finally on the richness of the reference signals, as compared to known adaptive pole placement schemes.

How to cite

top

Arvanitis, Kostas G., Kalogeropoulos, Grigoris, and Kookos, I. K.. "A new indirect adaptive pole placer for possibly non-minimum phase MIMO linear systems." Kybernetika 36.5 (2000): [497]-529. <http://eudml.org/doc/33499>.

@article{Arvanitis2000,
abstract = {The use of generalized sampled-data hold functions, in order to synthesize adaptive pole placers for linear multiple-input, multiple-output systems with unknown parameters, is investigated in this paper, for the first time. Such a control scheme relies on a periodically varying controller, which suitably modulates the sampled outputs of the controlled plant. The proposed control strategy allows us to assign the poles of the sampled closed-loop system arbitrarily in desired locations, and does not make assumptions on the plant other than controllability and observability of the continuous and the sampled system, and the knowledge of a set of structural indices, namely the locally minimum controllability indices of the continuous-time plant. The indirect adaptive control scheme presented here, estimates the unknown plant parameters (and hence the parameters of the desired modulating matrix function) on line, from sequential data of the inputs and the outputs of the plant, which are recursively updated within the time limit imposed by a fundamental sampling period $T_0$. The controller determination is based on the transformation of the discrete analogue of the system under control to a phase-variable canonical form, prior to the application of the control design procedure. The solution of the problem can, then, be obtained by a quite simple utilization of the concept of state similarity transformation, whereas known indirect adaptive pole placement techniques require the solution of matrix polynomial Diophantine equations. Moreover, in many cases, the solution of the Diophantine equation for a desired set of closed-loop eigenvalues might yield an unstable controller, and the overall adaptive pole placement scheme is then unstable with unstable compensators because their outputs are unbounded. The proposed strategy avoids these problems, since here gain controllers are essentially needed to be designed. Moreover, persistency of excitation and, therefore, parameter convergence, of the continuous-time plant is provided without making assumptions either on the existence of specific convex sets in which the estimated parameters belong or on the coprimeness of the polynomials describing the ARMA model, or finally on the richness of the reference signals, as compared to known adaptive pole placement schemes.},
author = {Arvanitis, Kostas G., Kalogeropoulos, Grigoris, Kookos, I. K.},
journal = {Kybernetika},
keywords = {generalized sampled-data; pole placement problem; adaptive control; generalized sampled-data; pole placement problem; adaptive control},
language = {eng},
number = {5},
pages = {[497]-529},
publisher = {Institute of Information Theory and Automation AS CR},
title = {A new indirect adaptive pole placer for possibly non-minimum phase MIMO linear systems},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/33499},
volume = {36},
year = {2000},
}

TY - JOUR
AU - Arvanitis, Kostas G.
AU - Kalogeropoulos, Grigoris
AU - Kookos, I. K.
TI - A new indirect adaptive pole placer for possibly non-minimum phase MIMO linear systems
JO - Kybernetika
PY - 2000
PB - Institute of Information Theory and Automation AS CR
VL - 36
IS - 5
SP - [497]
EP - 529
AB - The use of generalized sampled-data hold functions, in order to synthesize adaptive pole placers for linear multiple-input, multiple-output systems with unknown parameters, is investigated in this paper, for the first time. Such a control scheme relies on a periodically varying controller, which suitably modulates the sampled outputs of the controlled plant. The proposed control strategy allows us to assign the poles of the sampled closed-loop system arbitrarily in desired locations, and does not make assumptions on the plant other than controllability and observability of the continuous and the sampled system, and the knowledge of a set of structural indices, namely the locally minimum controllability indices of the continuous-time plant. The indirect adaptive control scheme presented here, estimates the unknown plant parameters (and hence the parameters of the desired modulating matrix function) on line, from sequential data of the inputs and the outputs of the plant, which are recursively updated within the time limit imposed by a fundamental sampling period $T_0$. The controller determination is based on the transformation of the discrete analogue of the system under control to a phase-variable canonical form, prior to the application of the control design procedure. The solution of the problem can, then, be obtained by a quite simple utilization of the concept of state similarity transformation, whereas known indirect adaptive pole placement techniques require the solution of matrix polynomial Diophantine equations. Moreover, in many cases, the solution of the Diophantine equation for a desired set of closed-loop eigenvalues might yield an unstable controller, and the overall adaptive pole placement scheme is then unstable with unstable compensators because their outputs are unbounded. The proposed strategy avoids these problems, since here gain controllers are essentially needed to be designed. Moreover, persistency of excitation and, therefore, parameter convergence, of the continuous-time plant is provided without making assumptions either on the existence of specific convex sets in which the estimated parameters belong or on the coprimeness of the polynomials describing the ARMA model, or finally on the richness of the reference signals, as compared to known adaptive pole placement schemes.
LA - eng
KW - generalized sampled-data; pole placement problem; adaptive control; generalized sampled-data; pole placement problem; adaptive control
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/33499
ER -

References

top
  1. Abramovitch D. Y., Franklin G. F., 10.1109/9.50341, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control AC-35 (1990), 303–306 (1990) Zbl0707.93030MR1044025DOI10.1109/9.50341
  2. Al-Rahmani H. M., Franklin G. F., 10.1109/9.8657, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 34 (1989), 99–103 (1989) Zbl0657.93024MR0970938DOI10.1109/9.8657
  3. Anderson B. D. O., Johnstone R. M., 10.1109/TAC.1985.1103799, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control AC-30 (1985), 11–22 (1985) Zbl0553.93032MR0777073DOI10.1109/TAC.1985.1103799
  4. Araki M., Hagiwara T., 10.1080/00207178608933692, Internat. J. Control 44 (1986), 1661–1673 (1986) Zbl0613.93040DOI10.1080/00207178608933692
  5. Arvanitis K. G., 10.1093/imamci/12.4.363, IMA J. Math. Control Inform. 12 (1995), 363–394 (1995) Zbl0848.93033MR1363319DOI10.1093/imamci/12.4.363
  6. Arvanitis K. G., 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1115(199611)10:6<673::AID-ACS405>3.0.CO;2-M, Internat. J. Adaptive Control Signal Process. 10 (1996), 673–705 (1996) Zbl0876.93056MR1423712DOI10.1002/(SICI)1099-1115(199611)10:6<673::AID-ACS405>3.0.CO;2-M
  7. Arvanitis K. G., An indirect model reference adaptive control algorithm based on multidetected–output controllers, Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 6 (1996), 667–706 (1996) Zbl0867.93048MR1438134
  8. Arvanitis K. G., Adaptive LQ regulation by multirate–output controllers, Found. Computing Dec. Sciences 21 (1996), 183–213 (1996) MR1440295
  9. Arvanitis K. G., An adaptive decoupling compensator for linear systems based on periodic multirate–input controllers, J. Math. Syst. Est. Control 8 (1998), 373–376 (1998) Zbl1126.93358MR1650078
  10. Arvanitis K. G., Kalogeropoulos G., A new periodic multirate model reference adaptive controller for possibly nonstably invertible plants, Kybernetika 33 (1997), 203–220 (1997) MR1454279
  11. Arvanitis K. G., Paraskevopoulos P. N., Exact model matching of linear systems using multirate digital controllers: In: Proc, 2nd European Control Conference, Groningen 1993, vol. 3, pp. 1648–1652 (1993) 
  12. Arvanitis K. G., Paraskevopoulos P. N., 10.1007/BF02191981, J. Optim. Theory Appl. 84 (1995), 471–493 (1995) MR1326071DOI10.1007/BF02191981
  13. Åstrom K. J., Wittenmark B., Analysis of a self–tuning regulator for non–minimum phase systems, In: Proc. IFAC Stochast. Control Symposium, Budapest 1974, pp. 165–173 (1974) 
  14. Åstrom K. J., Wittenmark B., Self–tuning controllers based on pole–zero placement, Proc. IEE–D 127 (1980), 120–130 (1980) 
  15. Chammas A. B., Leondes C. T., 10.1080/00207177808922419, Parts I and II. Internat. J. Control 27 (1978), 885–903 (1978) Zbl0388.93022MR0504221DOI10.1080/00207177808922419
  16. Das M., Cristi R., 10.1109/9.53562, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control AC-35 (1990), 752–756 (1990) Zbl0800.93452DOI10.1109/9.53562
  17. Egardt B., 10.1109/TAC.1980.1102416, IEEE Trans. Automomat. Control AC-25 (1980), 710–716 (1980) MR0583447DOI10.1109/TAC.1980.1102416
  18. Eising R., Hautus M. L. J., Realizations Algorithms for Systems over a Principal Ideal Domain, Memorandum COSOR 78–25, Eindhoven University of Technology, Dept. of Mathematics, Eindhoven 1978 
  19. Elliott H., 10.1109/TAC.1982.1102963, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control AC-27 (1982), 720–722 (1982) Zbl0493.93033DOI10.1109/TAC.1982.1102963
  20. Elliott H., Cristi R., Das M., 10.1109/TAC.1985.1103954, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control AC-30 (1985), 348–356 (1985) MR0786712DOI10.1109/TAC.1985.1103954
  21. Elliott H., Wolovich W. A., Das M., 10.1109/TAC.1984.1103491, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control AC-29 (1984), 221–229 (1984) Zbl0534.93026DOI10.1109/TAC.1984.1103491
  22. Giri F., Dion J. M., Dugard L., M’Saad M., 10.1109/9.16434, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control AC-34 (1989), 356–359 (1989) Zbl0666.93084MR0980372DOI10.1109/9.16434
  23. Giri F., M’Saad M., Dugard L., Dion J. M., 10.1002/acs.4480020103, Internat. J. Adaptive Control Signal Process. 2 (1988), 33–47 (1988) MR0941862DOI10.1002/acs.4480020103
  24. Goodwin G. C., Sin K. S., Adaptive Filtering, Prediction and Control, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J. 1984 Zbl0653.93001
  25. Greshak J. P., Vergese G. C., 10.1016/S0167-6911(82)80016-9, Systems Control Lett. 2 (1982), 88–93 (1982) MR0671861DOI10.1016/S0167-6911(82)80016-9
  26. Guidorzi R., 10.1016/0005-1098(75)90085-0, Automatica 11 (1975), 361–374 (1975) Zbl0309.93012MR0444226DOI10.1016/0005-1098(75)90085-0
  27. Hagiwara T., Araki M., 10.1109/9.1309, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control AC-33 (1988), 812–819 (1988) Zbl0648.93043MR0953875DOI10.1109/9.1309
  28. Ho B. L., Kalman R. E., Effective construction of linear state variable models from input/output functions, In: Proc. 3rd Allerton Conference, pp. 449–459; Regelungstechnik 14 (1966), 545–548 (1966) Zbl0145.12701MR0245360
  29. Kabamba P. T., 10.1109/TAC.1987.1104711, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control AC-32 (1987), 772–783 (1987) Zbl0627.93049MR0902487DOI10.1109/TAC.1987.1104711
  30. Kabamba P. T., Yang C., 10.1109/9.62275, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 36 (1991), 106–111 (1991) Zbl0745.93046MR1084253DOI10.1109/9.62275
  31. Kalman R. E., Ho Y. C., Narendra K. S., Controllability of linear dynamical systems, Contrib. Diff. Equations 1 (1972), 189-213, 1962 (1972) MR0155070
  32. Khargonekar P. P., Poola K., Tannenbaum A., 10.1109/TAC.1985.1103841, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control AC-30 (1985), 1088–1096 (1985) MR0810310DOI10.1109/TAC.1985.1103841
  33. Kinnaert M., Blondel V., 10.1016/0005-1098(92)90146-7, Automatica 28 (1992), 935–943 (1992) Zbl0766.93022MR1179696DOI10.1016/0005-1098(92)90146-7
  34. Kim J.-H., Hong Y.-C., Choi K.-K., 10.1109/9.83541, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control AC-36 (1991), 1073–1077 (1991) Zbl0754.93028MR1122486DOI10.1109/9.83541
  35. Lozano-Leal R., 10.1109/9.40771, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control AC-34 (1989), 1260–1267 (1989) Zbl0689.93038MR1029376DOI10.1109/9.40771
  36. Lozano-Leal R., Goodwin G. C., 10.1109/TAC.1985.1104036, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control AC-30 (1985), 795-798 (1985) MR0794220DOI10.1109/TAC.1985.1104036
  37. McElveen J. K., Lee K. R., Bennett J. E., 10.1109/41.141619, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electr. 39 (1992), 189–193 (1992) DOI10.1109/41.141619
  38. Mita T., Pang B. C., Liu K. Z., 10.1080/00207178708933868, Internat. J. Control 45 (1987), 2071–2082 (1987) Zbl0616.93051MR0891798DOI10.1080/00207178708933868
  39. Mo L., Bayoumi M. M., 10.1109/9.16435, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control AC-34 (1989), 359–363 (1989) Zbl0666.93083MR0980373DOI10.1109/9.16435
  40. Paraskevopoulos P. N., Arvanitis K. G., 10.1016/0005-1098(94)90127-9, Automatica 30 (1994), 503–506 (1994) Zbl0800.93329MR1268953DOI10.1016/0005-1098(94)90127-9
  41. Sastry S., Bodson M., Adaptive Control: Stability, Convergence and Robustness, Prentice–Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J. 1989 Zbl0721.93046
  42. Silverman L. M., 10.1109/TAC.1971.1099821, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control AC-16 (1971), 554–567 (1971) MR0307749DOI10.1109/TAC.1971.1099821
  43. Wellstead P. E., Edmunds J. M., Prager D., Zanker P., 10.1080/00207177908922754, Internat. J. Control 30 (1979), 1–26 (1979) Zbl0422.93096DOI10.1080/00207177908922754
  44. Youla D. C., Bongiorno J. J., Jr., Lu C. N., 10.1016/0005-1098(74)90021-1, Automatica 10 (1974), 159–173 (1974) MR0490293DOI10.1016/0005-1098(74)90021-1

NotesEmbed ?

top

You must be logged in to post comments.

To embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.

Only the controls for the widget will be shown in your chosen language. Notes will be shown in their authored language.

Tells the widget how many notes to show per page. You can cycle through additional notes using the next and previous controls.

    
                

                
Note: Best practice suggests putting the JavaScript code just before the closing </body> tag.