On the number of dissimilar pfaffian orientations of graphs

• Volume: 39, Issue: 1, page 93-113
• ISSN: 0988-3754

top

Abstract

top
A subgraph H of a graph G is conformal if G - V(H) has a perfect matching. An orientation D of G is Pfaffian if, for every conformal even circuit C, the number of edges of C whose directions in D agree with any prescribed sense of orientation of C is odd. A graph is Pfaffian if it has a Pfaffian orientation. Not every graph is Pfaffian. However, if G has a Pfaffian orientation D, then the determinant of the adjacency matrix of D is the square of the number of perfect matchings of G. (See the book by Lovász and Plummer [Matching Theory. Annals of Discrete Mathematics, vol. 9. Elsevier Science (1986), Chap. 8.] A matching covered graph is a nontrivial connected graph in which every edge is in some perfect matching. The study of Pfaffian orientations of graphs can be naturally reduced to matching covered graphs. The properties of matching covered graphs are thus helpful in understanding Pfaffian orientations of graphs. For example, say that two orientations of a graph are similar if one can be obtained from the other by reversing the orientations of all the edges in a cut of the graph. Using one of the theorems we proved in [M.H. de Carvalho, C.L. Lucchesi and U.S.R. Murty, Optimal ear decompositions of matching covered graphs. J. Combinat. Theory B85 (2002) 59–93] concerning optimal ear decompositions, we show that if a matching covered graph is Pfaffian then the number of dissimilar Pfaffian orientations of G is 2b(G), where b(G) is the number of “bricks” of G. In particular, any two Pfaffian orientations of a bipartite graph are similar. We deduce that the problem of determining whether or not a graph is Pfaffian is as difficult as the problem of determining whether or not a given orientation is Pfaffian, a result first proved by Vazirani and Yanakakis [Pfaffian orientation of graphs, 0,1 permanents, and even cycles in digraphs. Discrete Appl. Math.25 (1989) 179–180]. We establish a simple property of minimal graphs without a Pfaffian orientation and use it to give an alternative proof of the characterization of Pfaffian bipartite graphs due to Little [ A characterization of convertible (0,1)-matrices. J. Combinat. Theory B18 (1975) 187–208] .

How to cite

top

de Carvalho, Marcelo H., Lucchesi, Cláudio L., and Murty, U. S.R.. "On the number of dissimilar pfaffian orientations of graphs ." RAIRO - Theoretical Informatics and Applications 39.1 (2010): 93-113. <http://eudml.org/doc/92767>.

@article{deCarvalho2010,
abstract = { A subgraph H of a graph G is conformal if G - V(H) has a perfect matching. An orientation D of G is Pfaffian if, for every conformal even circuit C, the number of edges of C whose directions in D agree with any prescribed sense of orientation of C is odd. A graph is Pfaffian if it has a Pfaffian orientation. Not every graph is Pfaffian. However, if G has a Pfaffian orientation D, then the determinant of the adjacency matrix of D is the square of the number of perfect matchings of G. (See the book by Lovász and Plummer [Matching Theory. Annals of Discrete Mathematics, vol. 9. Elsevier Science (1986), Chap. 8.] A matching covered graph is a nontrivial connected graph in which every edge is in some perfect matching. The study of Pfaffian orientations of graphs can be naturally reduced to matching covered graphs. The properties of matching covered graphs are thus helpful in understanding Pfaffian orientations of graphs. For example, say that two orientations of a graph are similar if one can be obtained from the other by reversing the orientations of all the edges in a cut of the graph. Using one of the theorems we proved in [M.H. de Carvalho, C.L. Lucchesi and U.S.R. Murty, Optimal ear decompositions of matching covered graphs. J. Combinat. Theory B85 (2002) 59–93] concerning optimal ear decompositions, we show that if a matching covered graph is Pfaffian then the number of dissimilar Pfaffian orientations of G is 2b(G), where b(G) is the number of “bricks” of G. In particular, any two Pfaffian orientations of a bipartite graph are similar. We deduce that the problem of determining whether or not a graph is Pfaffian is as difficult as the problem of determining whether or not a given orientation is Pfaffian, a result first proved by Vazirani and Yanakakis [Pfaffian orientation of graphs, 0,1 permanents, and even cycles in digraphs. Discrete Appl. Math.25 (1989) 179–180]. We establish a simple property of minimal graphs without a Pfaffian orientation and use it to give an alternative proof of the characterization of Pfaffian bipartite graphs due to Little [ A characterization of convertible (0,1)-matrices. J. Combinat. Theory B18 (1975) 187–208] . },
author = {de Carvalho, Marcelo H., Lucchesi, Cláudio L., Murty, U. S.R.},
journal = {RAIRO - Theoretical Informatics and Applications},
keywords = {perfect matching; Pfaffian graph; matching covered graphs},
language = {eng},
month = {3},
number = {1},
pages = {93-113},
publisher = {EDP Sciences},
title = {On the number of dissimilar pfaffian orientations of graphs },
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/92767},
volume = {39},
year = {2010},
}

TY - JOUR
AU - de Carvalho, Marcelo H.
AU - Lucchesi, Cláudio L.
AU - Murty, U. S.R.
TI - On the number of dissimilar pfaffian orientations of graphs
JO - RAIRO - Theoretical Informatics and Applications
DA - 2010/3//
PB - EDP Sciences
VL - 39
IS - 1
SP - 93
EP - 113
AB - A subgraph H of a graph G is conformal if G - V(H) has a perfect matching. An orientation D of G is Pfaffian if, for every conformal even circuit C, the number of edges of C whose directions in D agree with any prescribed sense of orientation of C is odd. A graph is Pfaffian if it has a Pfaffian orientation. Not every graph is Pfaffian. However, if G has a Pfaffian orientation D, then the determinant of the adjacency matrix of D is the square of the number of perfect matchings of G. (See the book by Lovász and Plummer [Matching Theory. Annals of Discrete Mathematics, vol. 9. Elsevier Science (1986), Chap. 8.] A matching covered graph is a nontrivial connected graph in which every edge is in some perfect matching. The study of Pfaffian orientations of graphs can be naturally reduced to matching covered graphs. The properties of matching covered graphs are thus helpful in understanding Pfaffian orientations of graphs. For example, say that two orientations of a graph are similar if one can be obtained from the other by reversing the orientations of all the edges in a cut of the graph. Using one of the theorems we proved in [M.H. de Carvalho, C.L. Lucchesi and U.S.R. Murty, Optimal ear decompositions of matching covered graphs. J. Combinat. Theory B85 (2002) 59–93] concerning optimal ear decompositions, we show that if a matching covered graph is Pfaffian then the number of dissimilar Pfaffian orientations of G is 2b(G), where b(G) is the number of “bricks” of G. In particular, any two Pfaffian orientations of a bipartite graph are similar. We deduce that the problem of determining whether or not a graph is Pfaffian is as difficult as the problem of determining whether or not a given orientation is Pfaffian, a result first proved by Vazirani and Yanakakis [Pfaffian orientation of graphs, 0,1 permanents, and even cycles in digraphs. Discrete Appl. Math.25 (1989) 179–180]. We establish a simple property of minimal graphs without a Pfaffian orientation and use it to give an alternative proof of the characterization of Pfaffian bipartite graphs due to Little [ A characterization of convertible (0,1)-matrices. J. Combinat. Theory B18 (1975) 187–208] .
LA - eng
KW - perfect matching; Pfaffian graph; matching covered graphs
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/92767
ER -

References

top
1. M.H. de Carvalho, C.L. Lucchesi and U.S.R. Murty, The perfect matching polytope and solid bricks. J. Combin. Theory B92 (2004) 319–324.
2. M.H. de Carvalho, C.L. Lucchesi and U.S.R. Murty, Ear decompositions of matching covered graphs. Combinatorica19 (1999) 151–174.
3. M.H. de Carvalho, C.L. Lucchesi and U.S.R. Murty, On a conjecture of Lovász concerning bricks. I. The characteristic of a matching covered graph. J. Comb. Theory B85 (2002) 94–136.
4. M.H. de Carvalho, C.L. Lucchesi and U.S.R. Murty, On a conjecture of Lovász concerning bricks. II. Bricks of finite characteristic. J. Comb. Theory B85 (2002) 137–180.
5. M.H. de Carvalho, C.L. Lucchesi and U.S.R. Murty, Optimal ear decompositions of matching covered graphs. J. Comb. Theory B85 (2002) 59–93.
6. J. Edmonds, L. Lovász and W.R. PulleyblanK, Brick decomposition and the matching rank of graphs. Combinatorica2 (1982) 247–274.
7. I. Fischer and C.H.C. Little, A characterisation of Pfaffian near bipartite graphs. J. Comb. Theory B82 (2001) 175–222.
8. P.W. Kasteleyn, Dimer statistics and phase transitions. J. Math. Phys.4 (1963) 287–293.
9. C. Little, A characterization of convertible (0,1)-matrices. J. Comb. Theory B18 (1975) 187–208.
10. C.H.C. Little and F. Rendl, Operations preserving the Pfaffian property of a graph. J. Austral. Math. Soc. Ser. A50 (1991) 248–275.
11. L. Lovász, Matching structure and the matching lattice. J. Comb. Theory B43 (1987) 187–222.
12. L. Lovász and M.D. Plummer, Matching Theory. Annals of Discrete Mathematics, vol. 29. Elsevier Science (1986).
13. W. McCuaig, Brace generation. J. Graph Theory38 (2001) 124–169.
14. N. Robertson, P.D. Seymour and R. Thomas, Permanents, Pfaffian orientations and even directed circuits. Ann. Math.150 (1999) 929–975.
15. W.T. Tutte, Graph Theory as I Have Known It. Number 11 in Oxford Lecture Ser. Math. Appl. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1998).
16. V.V. Vazirani and M. Yanakakis, Pfaffian orientation of graphs, 0,1 permanents, and even cycles in digraphs. Discrete Appl. Math.25 (1989) 179–180.

NotesEmbed?

top

You must be logged in to post comments.

To embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.

Only the controls for the widget will be shown in your chosen language. Notes will be shown in their authored language.

Tells the widget how many notes to show per page. You can cycle through additional notes using the next and previous controls.

Note: Best practice suggests putting the JavaScript code just before the closing </body> tag.