The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

Currently displaying 1 – 2 of 2

Showing per page

Order by Relevance | Title | Year of publication

Lipschitz stability in the determination of the principal part of a parabolic equation

Ganghua YuanMasahiro Yamamoto — 2009

ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations

Let y ( h ) ( t , x ) be one solution to t y ( t , x ) - i , j = 1 n j ( a i j ( x ) i y ( t , x ) ) = h ( t , x ) , 0 < t < T , x Ω with a non-homogeneous term h , and y | ( 0 , T ) × Ω = 0 , where Ω n is a bounded domain. We discuss an inverse problem of determining n ( n + 1 ) / 2 unknown functions a i j by { ν y ( h ) | ( 0 , T ) × Γ 0 , y ( h ) ( θ , · ) } 1 0 after selecting input sources h 1 , . . . , h 0 suitably, where Γ 0 is an arbitrary subboundary, ν denotes the normal derivative, 0 < θ < T and 0 . In the case of 0 = ( n + 1 ) 2 n / 2 , we prove the Lipschitz stability in the inverse problem if we choose ( h 1 , . . . , h 0 ) from a set { C 0 ( ( 0 , T ) × ω ) } 0 with an arbitrarily fixed subdomain ω Ω . Moreover we can take 0 = ( n + 3 ) n / 2 by making special choices...

Lipschitz stability in the determination of the principal part of a parabolic equation

Ganghua YuanMasahiro Yamamoto — 2008

ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations

Let be one solution to t y ( t , x ) - i , j = 1 n j ( a i j ( x ) i y ( t , x ) ) = h ( t , x ) , 0 < t < T , x Ω with a non-homogeneous term , and y | ( 0 , T ) × Ω = 0 , where Ω n is a bounded domain. We discuss an inverse problem of determining unknown functions by { ν y ( h ) | ( 0 , T ) × Γ 0 , y ( h ) ( θ , · ) } 1 0 after selecting input sources h 1 , . . . , h 0 suitably, where Γ 0 is an arbitrary subboundary, ν denotes the normal derivative, 0 < θ < T and 0 . In the case of 0 = ( n + 1 ) 2 n / 2 , we prove the Lipschitz stability in the inverse problem if we choose ( h 1 , . . . , h 0 ) from a set { C 0 ( ( 0 , T ) × ω ) } 0 with an arbitrarily fixed subdomain ω Ω . Moreover we can take 0 = ( n + 3 ) n / 2 by making special choices for h ,...

Page 1

Download Results (CSV)