Currently displaying 1 – 3 of 3

Showing per page

Order by Relevance | Title | Year of publication

Note: Sharp Upper and Lower Bounds on the Number of Spanning Trees in Cartesian Product of Graphs

Jernej Azarija — 2013

Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory

Let G1 and G2 be simple graphs and let n1 = |V (G1)|, m1 = |E(G1)|, n2 = |V (G2)| and m2 = |E(G2)|. In this paper we derive sharp upper and lower bounds for the number of spanning trees τ in the Cartesian product G1 □G2 of G1 and G2. We show that: [...] and [...] . We also characterize the graphs for which equality holds. As a by-product we derive a formula for the number of spanning trees in Kn1 □Kn2 which turns out to be [...] .

Counting graphs with different numbers of spanning trees through the counting of prime partitions

Jernej Azarija — 2014

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal

Let A n ( n 1 ) be the set of all integers x such that there exists a connected graph on n vertices with precisely x spanning trees. It was shown by Sedláček that | A n | grows faster than the linear function. In this paper, we show that | A n | grows faster than n e ( 2 π / 3 ) n / log n by making use of some asymptotic results for prime partitions. The result settles a question posed in J. Sedláček, On the number of spanning trees of finite graphs, Čas. Pěst. Mat., 94 (1969), 217–221.

Euler's idoneal numbers and an inequality concerning minimal graphs with a prescribed number of spanning trees

Jernej AzarijaRiste Škrekovski — 2013

Mathematica Bohemica

Let α ( n ) be the least number k for which there exists a simple graph with k vertices having precisely n 3 spanning trees. Similarly, define β ( n ) as the least number k for which there exists a simple graph with k edges having precisely n 3 spanning trees. As an n -cycle has exactly n spanning trees, it follows that α ( n ) , β ( n ) n . In this paper, we show that α ( n ) 1 3 ( n + 4 ) and β ( n ) 1 3 ( n + 7 ) if and only if n { 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 9 , 10 , 13 , 18 , 22 } , which is a subset of Euler’s idoneal numbers. Moreover, if n ¬ 2 ( mod 3 ) and n 25 we show that α ( n ) 1 4 ( n + 9 ) and β ( n ) 1 4 ( n + 13 ) . This improves some previously estabilished bounds.

Page 1

Download Results (CSV)