The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

Currently displaying 1 – 8 of 8

Showing per page

Order by Relevance | Title | Year of publication

Primefree shifted Lucas sequences

Lenny Jones — 2015

Acta Arithmetica

We say a sequence = ( s ) n 0 is primefree if |sₙ| is not prime for all n ≥ 0, and to rule out trivial situations, we require that no single prime divides all terms of . In this article, we focus on the particular Lucas sequences of the first kind, a = ( u ) n 0 , defined by u₀ = 0, u₁ = 1, and uₙ = aun-1 + un-2 for n≥2, where a is a fixed integer. More precisely, we show that for any integer a, there exist infinitely many integers k such that both of the shifted sequences a ± k are simultaneously primefree. This result extends...

Generalizing a theorem of Schur

Lenny Jones — 2014

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal

In a letter written to Landau in 1935, Schur stated that for any integer t > 2 , there are primes p 1 < p 2 < < p t such that p 1 + p 2 > p t . In this note, we use the Prime Number Theorem and extend Schur’s result to show that for any integers t k 1 and real ϵ > 0 , there exist primes p 1 < p 2 < < p t such that p 1 + p 2 + + p k > ( k - ϵ ) p t .

A class of irreducible polynomials

Joshua HarringtonLenny Jones — 2013

Colloquium Mathematicae

Let f ( x ) = x + k n - 1 x n - 1 + k n - 2 x n - 2 + + k x + k [ x ] , where 3 k n - 1 k n - 2 k k 2 k n - 1 - 3 . We show that f(x) and f(x²) are irreducible over ℚ. Moreover, the upper bound of 2 k n - 1 - 3 on the coefficients of f(x) is the best possible in this situation.

Page 1

Download Results (CSV)