The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
Let T be the standard Cantor-Lebesgue function that maps the Cantor space onto the unit interval ⟨0,1⟩. We prove within ZFC that for every , X is meager additive in iff T(X) is meager additive in ⟨0,1⟩. As a consequence, we deduce that the cartesian product of meager additive sets in ℝ remains meager additive in ℝ × ℝ. In this note, we also study the relationship between null additive sets in and ℝ.
We prove in ZFC that there is a set and a surjective function H: A → ⟨0,1⟩ such that for every null additive set X ⊆ ⟨0,1), is null additive in . This settles in the affirmative a question of T. Bartoszyński.
We prove among other theorems that it is consistent with that there exists a set which is not meager additive, yet it satisfies the following property: for each measure zero set , belongs to the intersection ideal .
We prove in ZFC that every additive set is additive, thus we solve Problem 20 from paper [Weiss T., A note on the intersection ideal , Comment. Math. Univ. Carolin. 54 (2013), no. 3, 437-445] in the negative.
Download Results (CSV)