The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
For a plate subject to stress boundary condition, the deformation
determined by the Reissner–Mindlin plate bending model could be
bending dominated, transverse shear dominated, or neither
(intermediate), depending on the load. We show that the
Reissner–Mindlin model has a wider range of applicability than
the Kirchhoff–Love model, but it does not always converge to the
elasticity theory. In the case of bending domination, both the two
models are accurate. In the case of transverse shear domination,
the...
Download Results (CSV)