Currently displaying 1 – 3 of 3

Showing per page

Order by Relevance | Title | Year of publication

On total restrained domination in graphs

De-xiang MaXue-Gang ChenLiang Sun — 2005

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal

In this paper we initiate the study of total restrained domination in graphs. Let G = ( V , E ) be a graph. A total restrained dominating set is a set S V where every vertex in V - S is adjacent to a vertex in S as well as to another vertex in V - S , and every vertex in S is adjacent to another vertex in S . The total restrained domination number of G , denoted by γ r t ( G ) , is the smallest cardinality of a total restrained dominating set of G . First, some exact values and sharp bounds for γ r t ( G ) are given in Section 2. Then the Nordhaus-Gaddum-type...

Existence and iteration of positive solutions for a singular two-point boundary value problem with a p -Laplacian operator

De-xiang MaWeigao GeZhan-Ji Gui — 2007

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal

In the paper, we obtain the existence of symmetric or monotone positive solutions and establish a corresponding iterative scheme for the equation ( φ p ( u ' ) ) ' + q ( t ) f ( u ) = 0 , 0 < t < 1 , where φ p ( s ) : = | s | p - 2 s , p > 1 , subject to nonlinear boundary condition. The main tool is the monotone iterative technique. Here, the coefficient q ( t ) may be singular at t = 0 , 1 .

A note on the independent domination number of subset graph

Xue-Gang ChenDe-xiang MaHua Ming XingLiang Sun — 2005

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal

The independent domination number i ( G ) (independent number β ( G ) ) is the minimum (maximum) cardinality among all maximal independent sets of G . Haviland (1995) conjectured that any connected regular graph G of order n and degree δ 1 2 n satisfies i ( G ) 2 n 3 δ 1 2 δ . For 1 k l m , the subset graph S m ( k , l ) is the bipartite graph whose vertices are the k - and l -subsets of an m element ground set where two vertices are adjacent if and only if one subset is contained in the other. In this paper, we give a sharp upper bound for i ( S m ( k , l ) ) and prove that...

Page 1

Download Results (CSV)