On an extension of a theorem of Tunnell
Dipendra Prasad (1994)
Compositio Mathematica
Similarity:
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
Dipendra Prasad (1994)
Compositio Mathematica
Similarity:
V. I. Gryn, V. A. Ovsyannikov (1990)
Banach Center Publications
Similarity:
Saharon Shelah (2008)
Colloquium Mathematicae
Similarity:
We show the consistency of the statement: "the set of regular cardinals which are the characters of ultrafilters on ω is not convex". We also deal with the set of π-characters of ultrafilters on ω.
P.A. Leonard, B.C. Mortimer (1976)
Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik
Similarity:
Katalin Gyarmati, Attila Pethő, András Sárközy (2005)
Acta Arithmetica
Similarity:
Helversen-Pasotto, Anna
Similarity:
[For the entire collection see Zbl 0742.00067.]In the first part some general results on Hecke algebras are recalled; the structure constants corresponding to the standard basis are defined; in the following the example of the commuting algebra of the Gelfand- Graev representation of the general linear group is examined; here is a finite field of elements; the structure constants are explicitly determined first for the standard basis and then for a new basis obtained via a Mellin-transformation....
Mariagrazia Bianchi, David Chillag, Emanuele Pacifici (2006)
Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova
Similarity:
Shoichi Nakajima (1995)
Journal de théorie des nombres de Bordeaux
Similarity:
M.T. Karkar, J.A. Green (1975)
Mathematische Annalen
Similarity:
S. Louboutin (2013)
Colloquium Mathematicae
Similarity:
We give explicit constants κ such that if χ is a real non-principal Dirichlet character for which L(1,χ) ≤ κ, then Chowla's hypothesis is not satisfied and we cannot use Chowla's method for proving that L(s,χ) > 0 for s > 0. These constants are larger than the previous ones κ = 1- log 2 = 0.306... and κ = 0.367... we obtained elsewhere.
Bart de Smit (2001)
Acta Arithmetica
Similarity: