Unitary representations and modular actions.

Kechris, A.S.

Displaying similar documents to “Unitary representations and modular actions.”

Nonergodic actions, cocycles and superrigidity.

Fisher, David, Morris, Dave Witte, Whyte, Kevin (2004)

The New York Journal of Mathematics [electronic only]

Similarity:

The plancherel formula for group extensions

Adam Kleppner, Ronald Lipsman (1972)

Annales scientifiques de l'École Normale Supérieure

Similarity:

Modular representations and almost free actions.

Aner Shalev (1995)

Forum mathematicum

Similarity:

Geometric modular action and transformation groups

Stephen J. Summers (1996)

Annales de l'I.H.P. Physique théorique

Similarity:

Homomorphisms of ergodic group actions and conjugacy of skew product actions.

Reyes, Edgar N. (1996)

International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences

Similarity:

Orbit equivalence rigidity.

Furman, Alex (1999)

Annals of Mathematics. Second Series

Similarity:

The modular characters of the twisted Chevalley group 2D4(2) over GF2.

Ibrahim A. I. Suleiman (1995)

Revista Matemática de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Similarity:

In this paper we calculate the 2-modular character table of the twisted Chevalley group 2D4(2) using computer techniques available in an algebra package called Meat-Axe. This package is now available in Mu'tah University as well as other universities such as Birmingham University in the UK and Aachen University in Germany. The determination of this character table will be a contribution to modular calculations of various simple groups.

Rigidity and cocycles for ergodic actions of semi-simple Lie groups

Harry Furstenberg (1979-1980)

Séminaire Bourbaki

Similarity:

Recent developments in the theory of Borel reducibility

Greg Hjorth, Alexander S. Kechris (2001)

Fundamenta Mathematicae

Similarity:

Let E₀ be the Vitali equivalence relation and E₃ the product of countably many copies of E₀. Two new dichotomy theorems for Borel equivalence relations are proved. First, for any Borel equivalence relation E that is (Borel) reducible to E₃, either E is reducible to E₀ or else E₃ is reducible to E. Second, if E is a Borel equivalence relation induced by a Borel action of a closed subgroup of the infinite symmetric group that admits an invariant metric, then either E is reducible...