Displaying similar documents to “Forcing countable networks for spaces satisfying R ( X ω ) = ω

Intersection topologies with respect to separable GO-spaces and the countable ordinals

M. Jones (1995)

Fundamenta Mathematicae

Similarity:

Given two topologies, T 1 and T 2 , on the same set X, the intersection topologywith respect to T 1 and T 2 is the topology with basis U 1 U 2 : U 1 T 1 , U 2 T 2 . Equivalently, T is the join of T 1 and T 2 in the lattice of topologies on the set X. Following the work of Reed concerning intersection topologies with respect to the real line and the countable ordinals, Kunen made an extensive investigation of normality, perfectness and ω 1 -compactness in this class of topologies. We demonstrate that the majority of his results...

On the preservation of separation axioms in products

Milan Z. Grulović, Miloš S. Kurilić (1992)

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

Similarity:

We give sufficient and necessary conditions to be fulfilled by a filter Ψ and an ideal Λ in order that the Ψ -quotient space of the Λ -ideal product space preserves T k -properties ( k = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 3 1 2 ) (“in the sense of the Łos theorem”). Tychonoff products, box products and ultraproducts appear as special cases of the general construction.

On the cardinality and weight spectra of compact spaces, II

Istvan Juhász, Saharon Shelah (1998)

Fundamenta Mathematicae

Similarity:

Let B(κ,λ) be the subalgebra of P(κ) generated by [ κ ] λ . It is shown that if B is any homomorphic image of B(κ,λ) then either | B | < 2 λ or | B | = | B | λ ; moreover, if X is the Stone space of B then either | X | 2 2 λ or | X | = | B | = | B | λ . This implies the existence of 0-dimensional compact T 2 spaces whose cardinality and weight spectra omit lots of singular cardinals of “small” cofinality.

Inessentiality with respect to subspaces

Michael Levin (1995)

Fundamenta Mathematicae

Similarity:

Let X be a compactum and let A = ( A i , B i ) : i = 1 , 2 , . . . be a countable family of pairs of disjoint subsets of X. Then A is said to be essential on Y ⊂ X if for every closed F i separating A i and B i the intersection ( F i ) Y is not empty. So A is inessential on Y if there exist closed F i separating A i and B i such that F i does not intersect Y. Properties of inessentiality are studied and applied to prove:  Theorem. For every countable family of pairs of disjoint open subsets of a compactum X there exists an open set G ∩ X on...

A problem of Galambos on Engel expansions

Jun Wu (2000)

Acta Arithmetica

Similarity:

1. Introduction. Given x in (0,1], let x = [d₁(x),d₂(x),...] denote the Engel expansion of x, that is, (1) x = 1 / d ( x ) + 1 / ( d ( x ) d ( x ) ) + . . . + 1 / ( d ( x ) d ( x ) . . . d n ( x ) ) + . . . , where d j ( x ) , j 1 is a sequence of positive integers satisfying d₁(x) ≥ 2 and d j + 1 ( x ) d j ( x ) for j ≥ 1. (See [3].) In [3], János Galambos proved that for almost all x ∈ (0,1], (2) l i m n d n 1 / n ( x ) = e . He conjectured ([3], P132) that the Hausdorff dimension of the set where (2) fails is one. In this paper, we prove this conjecture: Theorem. d i m H x ( 0 , 1 ] : ( 2 ) f a i l s = 1 . We use L¹ to denote the one-dimensional Lebesgue measure on (0,1] and d i m H to denote...

Embedding of the ordinal segment [ 0 , ω 1 ] into continuous images of Valdivia compacta

Ondřej F. K. Kalenda (1999)

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

Similarity:

We prove in particular that a continuous image of a Valdivia compact space is Corson provided it contains no homeomorphic copy of the ordinal segment [ 0 , ω 1 ] . This generalizes a result of R. Deville and G. Godefroy who proved it for Valdivia compact spaces. We give also a refinement of their result which yields a pointwise version of retractions on a Valdivia compact space.

On infinite composition of affine mappings

László Máté (1999)

Fundamenta Mathematicae

Similarity:

 Let F i = 1 , . . . , N be affine mappings of n . It is well known that if there exists j ≤ 1 such that for every σ 1 , . . . , σ j 1 , . . . , N the composition (1) F σ 1 . . . F σ j is a contraction, then for any infinite sequence σ 1 , σ 2 , . . . 1 , . . . , N and any z n , the sequence (2) F σ 1 . . . F σ n ( z ) is convergent and the limit is independent of z. We prove the following converse result: If (2) is convergent for any z n and any σ = σ 1 , σ 2 , . . . belonging to some subshift Σ of N symbols (and the limit is independent of z), then there exists j ≥ 1 such that for every σ = σ 1 , σ 2 , . . . Σ the composition (1) is a contraction....