Displaying similar documents to “Indiscernibles and dimensional compactness”

p -sequential like properties in function spaces

Salvador García-Ferreira, Angel Tamariz-Mascarúa (1994)

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

Similarity:

We introduce the properties of a space to be strictly WFU ( M ) or strictly SFU ( M ) , where M ω * , and we analyze them and other generalizations of p -sequentiality ( p ω * ) in Function Spaces, such as Kombarov’s weakly and strongly M -sequentiality, and Kocinac’s WFU ( M ) and SFU ( M ) -properties. We characterize these in C π ( X ) in terms of cover-properties in X ; and we prove that weak M -sequentiality is equivalent to WFU ( L ( M ) ) -property, where L ( M ) = { λ p : λ < ω 1 and p M } , in the class of spaces which are p -compact for every p M ω * ; and that C π ( X ) is a WFU ( L ( M ) ) -space iff...

Ultrafilter-limit points in metric dynamical systems

Salvador García-Ferreira, Manuel Sanchis (2007)

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

Similarity:

Given a free ultrafilter p on and a space X , we say that x X is the p -limit point of a sequence ( x n ) n in X (in symbols, x = p - lim n x n ) if for every neighborhood V of x , { n : x n V } p . By using p -limit points from a suitable metric space, we characterize the selective ultrafilters on and the P -points of * = β ( ) . In this paper, we only consider dynamical systems ( X , f ) , where X is a compact metric space. For a free ultrafilter p on * , the function f p : X X is defined by f p ( x ) = p - lim n f n ( x ) for each x X . These functions are not continuous in general....

Finite canonization

Saharon Shelah (1996)

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

Similarity:

The canonization theorem says that for given m , n for some m * (the first one is called E R ( n ; m ) ) we have for every function f with domain [ 1 , , m * ] n , for some A [ 1 , , m * ] m , the question of when the equality f ( i 1 , , i n ) = f ( j 1 , , j n ) (where i 1 < < i n and j 1 < j n are from A ) holds has the simplest answer: for some v { 1 , , n } the equality holds iff v i = j . We improve the bound on E R ( n , m ) so that fixing n the number of exponentiation needed to calculate E R ( n , m ) is best possible.