Displaying similar documents to “Cross additivity - an application”

On not being rational.

I. Richard Savage (1980)

Trabajos de Estadística e Investigación Operativa

Similarity:

A Bayesian decision-theoretic approach appears to me as a sensible idealization of a guide to behaviour. At the same time i would like to understand why my behaviour is not always of this form: I sometimes use randomization and I sometimes find confidence intervals acceptable. Not all of my problems have an explicit cost function. Am I lazy or irrational? Do I use non-Bayesian conventions to help communicate? Is the cost of rationality-computation missing from the Bayesian model? ...

Personal and inter-personal ethics: Discussion.

Dennis V. Lindley, Allan M. Skene, José M. Bernardo, Morris H. DeGroot, Irving John Good, Anthony O'Hagan (1980)

Trabajos de Estadística e Investigación Operativa

Similarity:

Discussion on the papers by Savage, I. Richard, On not being rational and by Kadane, Joseph B. and Sedransj, Nell, Toward a more ethical clinical trial, both of them part of a round table on Personal and inter-personal ethics held in the First International Congress on Bayesian Methods (Valencia, Spain, 28 May - 2 June 1979).

Overcoming priors anxiety.

G. D'AGOSTINI (1999)

Revista de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales

Similarity:

Beliefs about beliefs: Discussion.

Morris H. DeGroot, Melvin R. Novick, Seymour Geisser, Tom Leonard, Dennis V. Lindley (1980)

Trabajos de Estadística e Investigación Operativa

Similarity:

Discussion on the papers by Dickey, James M., Beliefs about beliefs, a theory for stochastic assessment of subjective probabilities and by Good, Irving John, Some history of the hierarchical Bayesian methodology, both of them part of a round table on Beliefs about beliefs held in the First International Congress on Bayesian Methods (Valencia, Spain, 28 May - 2 June 1979).

On the frequentist and Bayesian approaches to hypothesis testing.

Elías Moreno, F. Javier Girón (2006)

SORT

Similarity:

Hypothesis testing is a model selection problem for which the solution proposed by the two main statistical streams of thought, frequentists and Bayesians, substantially differ. One may think that this fact might be due to the prior chosen in the Bayesian analysis and that a convenient prior selection may reconcile both approaches. However, the Bayesian robustness viewpoint has shown that, in general, this is not so and hence a profound disagreement between both approaches exists. In...

Likelihood, sufficiency and ancillarity: Discussion.

George A. Barnard, P. R. Freeman, Daniel Peña, James M. Dickey, Seymour Geisser, Dennis V. Lindley, Anthony O'Hagan, Adrian F. M. Smith (1980)

Trabajos de Estadística e Investigación Operativa

Similarity:

Discussion on the papers by Akaike, Hirotugu, Likelihood and the Bayes procedure and by Dawid, A. Philip, A Bayesian look at nuisance parameters, both of them part of a round table on Likelihood, sufficiency and ancillarity held in the First International Congress on Bayesian Methods (Valencia, Spain, 28 May - 2 June 1979).

Hypothesis testing: Discussion.

Edwin T. Jaynes, David J. Spiegelhalter, Hirotugu Akaike, Arthur P. Dempster, James M. Dickey, Seymour Geisser, Irving John Good, Dennis V. Lindley, Anthony O'Hagan, Arnold Zellner (1980)

Trabajos de Estadística e Investigación Operativa

Similarity:

Discussion on the papers by Zellner, Arnold and Siow, Aloysius, Posterior odds ratios for selected regression hypotheses and by Bernardo, José M., A Bayesian analysis of classical hypotheses testing, both of them part of a round table on Hypothesis testing held in the First International Congress on Bayesian Methods (Valencia, Spain, 28 May - 2 June 1979).

Bayesian inference in applied statistics.

Arthur P. Dempster (1980)

Trabajos de Estadística e Investigación Operativa

Similarity:

The task of assessing posterior distributions from noisy empirical data imposes difficult requirements of modelling, computing and assessing sensitivity to model choice. Seasonal analysis of economic time series is used to illustrate ways of approaching such difficulties.

Some history of the hierarchical Bayesian methodology.

Irving John Good (1980)

Trabajos de Estadística e Investigación Operativa

Similarity:

A standard tecnique in subjective Bayesian methodology is for a subject (you) to make judgements of the probabilities that a physical probability lies in various intervals. In the Bayesian hierarchical technique you make probability judgements (of a higher type, order, level or stage) concerning the judgements of lower type. The paper will outline some of the history of this hierarchical technique with emphasis on the contributions by I. J. Good because I have read every word written...

Sequential learning, discontinuities and changes: Discussion.

Stephen E. Fienberg, José M. Bernardo, Philip J. Brown, A. Philip Dawid, James M. Dickey, Joseph B. Kadane, Tom Leonard (1980)

Trabajos de Estadística e Investigación Operativa

Similarity:

Discussion on the papers by Makov, Udi E., Approximation of unsupervised Bayes learning procedures, Smith, Adrian F. M., Change-Point problems: approaches and applications and by Harrison, P. J. and Smith Jim Q., Discontinuity, decision and conflict, the three of them part of a round table on Sequential learning, discontinuities and changes held in the First International Congress on Bayesian Methods (Valencia, Spain, 28 May - 2 June 1979).