The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

Displaying similar documents to “Pairings, duality, amenability and bounded cohomology”

Double complexes and vanishing of Novikov cohomology

Hüttemann, Thomas (2011)

Serdica Mathematical Journal

Similarity:

2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 18G35; Secondary 55U15. We consider non-standard totalisation functors for double complexes, involving left or right truncated products. We show how properties of these imply that the algebraic mapping torus of a self map h of a cochain complex of finitely presented modules has trivial negative Novikov cohomology, and has trivial positive Novikov cohomology provided h is a quasi-isomorphism. As an application we obtain a new...

Nash cohomology of smooth manifolds

W. Kucharz (2005)

Annales Polonici Mathematici

Similarity:

A Nash cohomology class on a compact Nash manifold is a mod 2 cohomology class whose Poincaré dual homology class can be represented by a Nash subset. We find a canonical way to define Nash cohomology classes on an arbitrary compact smooth manifold M. Then the Nash cohomology ring of M is compared to the ring of algebraic cohomology classes on algebraic models of M. This is related to three conjectures concerning algebraic cohomology classes.

Cutting description of trivial 1-cohomology

Andrzej Czarnecki (2014)

Annales Polonici Mathematici

Similarity:

A characterisation of trivial 1-cohomology, in terms of some connectedness condition, is presented for a broad class of metric spaces.

Distinguishing derived equivalence classes using the second Hochschild cohomology group

Deena Al-Kadi (2010)

Colloquium Mathematicae

Similarity:

We study the second Hochschild cohomology group of the preprojective algebra of type D₄ over an algebraically closed field K of characteristic 2. We also calculate the second Hochschild cohomology group of a non-standard algebra which arises as a socle deformation of this preprojective algebra and so show that the two algebras are not derived equivalent. This answers a question raised by Holm and Skowroński.