Let $R$ be a prime ring of char $R\ne 2$ with a nonzero derivation $d$ and let $U$ be its noncentral Lie ideal. If for some fixed integers $n_1\ge 0,n_2\ge 0,n_3\ge 0$, ${\left(u^{n_1}[d\left(u\right),u]u^{n_2}\right)}^{n_3}\in Z\left(R\right)$ for all $u\in U$, then $R$ satisfies $S_4$, the standard identity in four variables.

Let $R$ be a prime ring, $I$ a nonzero ideal of $R$, $d$ a derivation of $R$ and $m,n$ fixed positive integers. (i) If ${\left(d[x,y]\right)}^m={[x,y]}_n$ for all $x,y\in I$, then $R$ is commutative. (ii) If $\mathrm{Char}R\ne 2$ and ${[d\left(x\right),d\left(y\right)]}_m={[x,y]}^n$ for all $x,y\in I$, then $R$ is commutative. Moreover, we also examine the case when $R$ is a semiprime ring.

Let be a prime ring of characteristic different from 2, ${}_r$ be its right Martindale quotient ring and be its extended centroid. Suppose that is a non-zero generalized skew derivation of and f(x₁,..., xₙ) is a non-central multilinear polynomial over with n non-commuting variables. If there exists a non-zero element a of such that a[ (f(r₁,..., rₙ)),f(r₁, ..., rₙ)] = 0 for all r₁, ..., rₙ ∈ , then one of the following holds: (a) there exists λ ∈ such that (x) = λx for all x ∈ ; (b) there...

Let $R$ be a 2-torsion free prime ring and let $\sigma ,\tau$ be automorphisms of $R$. For any $x,y\in R$, set ${[x,y]}_{\sigma ,\tau }=x\sigma \left(y\right)-\tau \left(y\right)x$. Suppose that $d$ is a $(\sigma ,\tau )$-derivation defined on $R$. In the present paper it is shown that $\left(i\right)$ if $R$ satisfies ${[d\left(x\right),x]}_{\sigma ,\tau }=0$, then either $d=0$ or $R$ is commutative $\left(ii\right)$ if $I$ is a nonzero ideal of $R$ such that $\left[d\right(x),d(y\left)\right]=0$, for all $x,y\in I$, and $d$ commutes with both $\sigma$ and $\tau$, then either $d=0$ or $R$ is commutative. $\left(iii\right)$ if $I$ is a nonzero ideal of $R$ such that $d\left(xy\right)=d\left(yx\right)$, for all $x,y\in I$, and $d$ commutes with $\tau$, then $R$ is commutative. Finally a related result has been obtain...

Let $R$ be a $2$-torsion free $*$-prime ring, $d$ a derivation which commutes with $*$ and $J$ a $*$-Jordan ideal and a subring of $R$. In this paper, it is shown that if either $d$ acts as a homomorphism or as an anti-homomorphism on $J$, then $d=0$ or $J\subseteq Z\left(R\right)$. Furthermore, an example is given to demonstrate that the $*$-primeness hypothesis is not superfluous.