A small trivalent graph of girth 14.
Exoo, Geoffrey (2002)
The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics [electronic only]
Similarity:
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
Displaying similar documents to “The remarkable generalized Petersen graph ”
A small trivalent graph of girth 14.
A generalization of the friendship theorem
Marián Sudolský (1978)
Mathematica Slovaca
Similarity:
A note on randomly complete -partite graphs
Pavol Híc (1992)
Mathematica Slovaca
Similarity:
Regularity and Planarity of Token Graphs
Walter Carballosa, Ruy Fabila-Monroy, Jesús Leaños, Luis Manuel Rivera (2017)
Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory
Similarity:
Let G = (V, E) be a graph of order n and let 1 ≤ k < n be an integer. The k-token graph of G is the graph whose vertices are all the k-subsets of V, two of which are adjacent whenever their symmetric difference is a pair of adjacent vertices in G. In this paper we characterize precisely, for each value of k, which graphs have a regular k-token graph and which connected graphs have a planar k-token graph.
Combinatorial labelings of graphs.
Hegde, Suresh Manjanath, Shetty, Sudhakar (2006)
Applied Mathematics E-Notes [electronic only]
Similarity:
Bipartite graphs that are not circle graphs
André Bouchet (1999)
Annales de l'institut Fourier
Similarity:
The following result is proved: if a bipartite graph is not a circle graph, then its complement is not a circle graph. The proof uses Naji’s characterization of circle graphs by means of a linear system of equations with unknowns in . At the end of this short note I briefly recall the work of François Jaeger on circle graphs.