Displaying similar documents to “Fundamental groups of some special quadric arrangements.”

Braid Monodromy of Algebraic Curves

José Ignacio Cogolludo-Agustín (2011)

Annales mathématiques Blaise Pascal

Similarity:

These are the notes from a one-week course on Braid Monodromy of Algebraic Curves given at the Université de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour during the Première Ecole Franco-Espagnole: Groupes de tresses et topologie en petite dimension in October 2009. This is intended to be an introductory survey through which we hope we can briefly outline the power of the concept monodromy as a common area for group theory, algebraic geometry, and topology of projective...

On three-dimensional space groups.

Conway, John H., Delgado Friedrichs, Olaf, Huson, Daniel H., Thurston, William P. (2001)

Beiträge zur Algebra und Geometrie

Similarity:

A 4₃ configuration of lines and conics in ℙ⁵

Tomasz Szemberg (1994)

Annales Polonici Mathematici

Similarity:

Studying the connection between the title configuration and Kummer surfaces we write explicit quadratic equations for the latter. The main results are presented in Theorems 8 and 16.

Root arrangements of hyperbolic polynomial-like functions.

Vladimir Petrov Kostov (2006)

Revista Matemática Complutense

Similarity:

A real polynomial P of degree n in one real variable is hyperbolic if its roots are all real. A real-valued function P is called a hyperbolic polynomial-like function (HPLF) of degree n if it has n real zeros and P(n) vanishes nowhere. Denote by xk (i) the roots of P(i), k = 1, ..., n-i, i = 0, ..., n-1. Then in the absence of any equality of the form xi...

Very ampleness of multiples of principal polarization on degenerate Abelian surfaces.

Alessandro Arsie (2005)

Revista Matemática Complutense

Similarity:

Quite recently, Alexeev and Nakamura proved that if Y is a stable semi-Abelic variety (SSAV) of dimension g equipped with the ample line bundle O(1), which deforms to a principally polarized Abelian variety, then O(n) is very ample as soon as n ≥ 2g + 1, that is n ≥ 5 in the case of surfaces. Here it is proved, via elementary methods of projective geometry, that in the case of surfaces this bound can be improved to n ≥ 3.