Displaying 521 – 540 of 558

Showing per page

Operators preserving orthogonality of polynomials

Francisco Marcellán, Franciszek Szafraniec (1996)

Studia Mathematica

Let S be a degree preserving linear operator of ℝ[X] into itself. The question is if, preserving orthogonality of some orthogonal polynomial sequences, S must necessarily be an operator of composition with some affine function of ℝ. In [2] this problem was considered for S mapping sequences of Laguerre polynomials onto sequences of orthogonal polynomials. Here we improve substantially the theorems of [2] as well as disprove the conjecture proposed there. We also consider the same questions for polynomials...

Optimal estimates for the fractional Hardy operator

Yoshihiro Mizuta, Aleš Nekvinda, Tetsu Shimomura (2015)

Studia Mathematica

Let A α f ( x ) = | B ( 0 , | x | ) | - α / n B ( 0 , | x | ) f ( t ) d t be the n-dimensional fractional Hardy operator, where 0 < α ≤ n. It is well-known that A α is bounded from L p to L p α with p α = n p / ( α p - n p + n ) when n(1-1/p) < α ≤ n. We improve this result within the framework of Banach function spaces, for instance, weighted Lebesgue spaces and Lorentz spaces. We in fact find a ’source’ space S α , Y , which is strictly larger than X, and a ’target’ space T Y , which is strictly smaller than Y, under the assumption that A α is bounded from X into Y and the Hardy-Littlewood maximal operator...

Optimality of the range for which equivalence between certain measures of smoothness holds

Z. Ditzian (2010)

Studia Mathematica

Recently it was proved for 1 < p < ∞ that ω m ( f , t ) p , a modulus of smoothness on the unit sphere, and K ̃ ( f , t m ) p , a K-functional involving the Laplace-Beltrami operator, are equivalent. It will be shown that the range 1 < p < ∞ is optimal; that is, the equivalence ω m ( f , t ) p K ̃ ( f , t r ) p does not hold either for p = ∞ or for p = 1.

Orlicz boundedness for certain classical operators

E. Harboure, O. Salinas, B. Viviani (2002)

Colloquium Mathematicae

Let ϕ and ψ be functions defined on [0,∞) taking the value zero at zero and with non-negative continuous derivative. Under very mild extra assumptions we find necessary and sufficient conditions for the fractional maximal operator M Ω α , associated to an open bounded set Ω, to be bounded from the Orlicz space L ψ ( Ω ) into L ϕ ( Ω ) , 0 ≤ α < n. For functions ϕ of finite upper type these results can be extended to the Hilbert transform f̃ on the one-dimensional torus and to the fractional integral operator I Ω α , 0...

Orlicz bounds for operators of restricted weak type

Paul Alton Hagelstein (2005)

Colloquium Mathematicae

It is shown that if T is a sublinear translation invariant operator of restricted weak type (1,1) acting on L¹(𝕋), then T maps simple functions in L log L(𝕋) boundedly into L¹(𝕋).

Orlicz-Morrey spaces and the Hardy-Littlewood maximal function

Eiichi Nakai (2008)

Studia Mathematica

We prove basic properties of Orlicz-Morrey spaces and give a necessary and sufficient condition for boundedness of the Hardy-Littlewood maximal operator M from one Orlicz-Morrey space to another. For example, if f ∈ L(log L)(ℝⁿ), then Mf is in a (generalized) Morrey space (Example 5.1). As an application of boundedness of M, we prove the boundedness of generalized fractional integral operators, improving earlier results of the author.

Orthogonal polynomials and the Lanczos method

C. Brezinski, H. Sadok, M. Redivo Zaglia (1994)

Banach Center Publications

Lanczos method for solving a system of linear equations is well known. It is derived from a generalization of the method of moments and one of its main interests is that it provides the exact answer in at most n steps where n is the dimension of the system. Lanczos method can be implemented via several recursive algorithms known as Orthodir, Orthomin, Orthores, Biconjugate gradient,... In this paper, we show that all these procedures can be explained within the framework of formal orthogonal polynomials....

Currently displaying 521 – 540 of 558