First variation of the general curvature-dependent surface energy

Günay Doğan; Ricardo H. Nochetto

ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis (2011)

  • Volume: 46, Issue: 1, page 59-79
  • ISSN: 0764-583X

Abstract

top
We consider general surface energies, which are weighted integrals over a closed surface with a weight function depending on the position, the unit normal and the mean curvature of the surface. Energies of this form have applications in many areas, such as materials science, biology and image processing. Often one is interested in finding a surface that minimizes such an energy, which entails finding its first variation with respect to perturbations of the surface. We present a concise derivation of the first variation of the general surface energy using tools from shape differential calculus. We first derive a scalar strong form and next a vector weak form of the first variation. The latter reveals the variational structure of the first variation, avoids dealing explicitly with the tangential gradient of the unit normal, and thus can be easily discretized using parametric finite elements. Our results are valid for surfaces in any number of dimensions and unify all previous results derived for specific examples of such surface energies.

How to cite

top

Doğan, Günay, and Nochetto, Ricardo H.. "First variation of the general curvature-dependent surface energy." ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis 46.1 (2011): 59-79. <http://eudml.org/doc/222149>.

@article{Doğan2011,
abstract = { We consider general surface energies, which are weighted integrals over a closed surface with a weight function depending on the position, the unit normal and the mean curvature of the surface. Energies of this form have applications in many areas, such as materials science, biology and image processing. Often one is interested in finding a surface that minimizes such an energy, which entails finding its first variation with respect to perturbations of the surface. We present a concise derivation of the first variation of the general surface energy using tools from shape differential calculus. We first derive a scalar strong form and next a vector weak form of the first variation. The latter reveals the variational structure of the first variation, avoids dealing explicitly with the tangential gradient of the unit normal, and thus can be easily discretized using parametric finite elements. Our results are valid for surfaces in any number of dimensions and unify all previous results derived for specific examples of such surface energies. },
author = {Doğan, Günay, Nochetto, Ricardo H.},
journal = {ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis},
keywords = {Surface energy; gradient flow; mean curvature; Willmore functional; surface energy; Willmore functional},
language = {eng},
month = {7},
number = {1},
pages = {59-79},
publisher = {EDP Sciences},
title = {First variation of the general curvature-dependent surface energy},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/222149},
volume = {46},
year = {2011},
}

TY - JOUR
AU - Doğan, Günay
AU - Nochetto, Ricardo H.
TI - First variation of the general curvature-dependent surface energy
JO - ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis
DA - 2011/7//
PB - EDP Sciences
VL - 46
IS - 1
SP - 59
EP - 79
AB - We consider general surface energies, which are weighted integrals over a closed surface with a weight function depending on the position, the unit normal and the mean curvature of the surface. Energies of this form have applications in many areas, such as materials science, biology and image processing. Often one is interested in finding a surface that minimizes such an energy, which entails finding its first variation with respect to perturbations of the surface. We present a concise derivation of the first variation of the general surface energy using tools from shape differential calculus. We first derive a scalar strong form and next a vector weak form of the first variation. The latter reveals the variational structure of the first variation, avoids dealing explicitly with the tangential gradient of the unit normal, and thus can be easily discretized using parametric finite elements. Our results are valid for surfaces in any number of dimensions and unify all previous results derived for specific examples of such surface energies.
LA - eng
KW - Surface energy; gradient flow; mean curvature; Willmore functional; surface energy; Willmore functional
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/222149
ER -

References

top
  1. F. Almgren and J.E. Taylor, Optimal geometry in equilibrium and growth. Fractals3 (1995) 713–723. Symposium in Honor of B. Mandelbrot.  
  2. F. Almgren, J.E. Taylor and L. Wang, Curvature-driven flows: a variational approach. SIAM J. Control Optim.31 (1993) 387–438.  
  3. L. Ambrosio, Minimizing movements. Rend. Accad. Naz. Sci. XL Mem. Mat. Appl.19 (1995) 191–246.  
  4. L. Ambrosio, N. Gigli and G. Savaré, Gradient Flows in Metric Spaces and in the Space of Probability Measures. Lectures in Mathematics ETH Zürich, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel (2005).  
  5. J.W. Barrett, H. Garcke and R. Nürnberg, Parametric approximation of Willmore flow and related geometric evolution equations. SIAM J. Sci. Comput.31 (2008) 225–253.  
  6. M. Bauer and E. Kuwert, Existence of minimizing Willmore surfaces of prescribed genus. Int. Math. Res. Not.10 (2003) 553–576.  
  7. T. Baumgart, S.T. Hess and W.W. Webb, Image coexisting fluid domains in biomembrane models coupling curvature and line tension. Nature425 (2003) 821–824.  
  8. G. Bellettini and M. Paolini, Anisotropic motion by mean curvature in the context of Finsler geometry. Hokkaido Math. J.25 (1996) 537–566.  
  9. A. Bonito, R.H. Nochetto and M.S. Pauletti, Parametric FEM for geometric biomembranes. J. Comput. Phys.229 (2010) 3171–3188.  
  10. J.W. Cahn and D.W. Hoffman, A vector thermodynamics for anisotropic surfaces. II. Curved and facetted surfaces. Acta Metall.22 (1974) 1205–1214.  
  11. T. Chan and L. Vese, A level set algorithm for minimizing the Mumford-Shah functional in image processing, in Proceedings of the 1st IEEE Workshop on Variational and Level Set Methods in Computer Vision (2001) 161–168.  
  12. K. Chen, C. Jayaprakash, R. Pandit and W. Wenzel, Microemulsions: A Landau-Ginzburg theory. Phys. Rev. Lett.65 (1990) 2736–2739.  
  13. P. Cicuta, S.L. Keller and S.L. Veatch, Diffusion of liquid domains in lipid bilayer membranes. J. Phys. Chem. B111 (2007) 3328–3331.  
  14. U. Clarenz, U. Diewald, G. Dziuk, M. Rumpf and R. Rusu, A finite element method for surface restoration with smooth boundary conditions. Comput. Aided Geom. Des.21 (2004) 427–445.  
  15. M.C. Delfour and J.-P. Zolésio, Shapes and Geometries, Advances in Design and Control. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA (2001).  
  16. H.G. Döbereiner, O. Selchow and R. Lipowsky, Spontaneous curvature of fluid vesicles induced by trans-bilayer sugar asymmetry. Eur. Biophys. J.28 (1999) 174–178.  
  17. G. Doğan, P. Morin and R.H. Nochetto, A variational shape optimization approach for image segmentation with a Mumford-Shah functional. SIAM J. Sci. Comput.30 (2008) 3028–3049.  
  18. G. Doğan, P. Morin, R.H. Nochetto and M. Verani, Discrete gradient flows for shape optimization and applications. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng.196 (2007) 3898–3914.  
  19. M. Droske and M. Bertozzi, Higher-order feature-preserving geometric regularization. SIAM J. Imaging Sci.3 (2010) 21–51.  
  20. G. Dziuk, Computational parametric Willmore flow. Numer. Math.111 (2008) 55–80.  
  21. G. Dziuk, E. Kuwert and R. Schätzle, Evolution of elastic curves in ℝ n : existence and computation. SIAM J. Math. Anal.33 (electronic) (2002) 1228–1245.  
  22. C.M. Elliott and B. Stinner, Modeling and computation of two phase geometric biomembranes using surface finite elements. J. Comput. Phys.229 (2010) 6585–6612.  
  23. W. Helfrich, Elastic properties of lipid bilayers – theory and possible experiments. Zeitschrift Fur Naturforschung C-A J. Biosc.28 (1973) 693.  
  24. M. Hintermüller and W. Ring, A second order shape optimization approach for image segmentation. SIAM J. Appl. Math.64 (2003/04) 442–467.  
  25. M. Hintermüller and W. Ring, An inexact Newton-CG-type active contour approach for the minimization of the Mumford-Shah functional. J. Math. Imaging and Vision20 (2004) 19–42. Special issue on mathematics and image analysis.  
  26. J.T. Jenkins, The equations of mechanical equilibrium of a model membrane. SIAM J. Appl. Math.32 (1977) 755–764.  
  27. R. Keriven and O. Faugeras, Variational principles, surface evolution, PDEs, level set methods and the stereo problem. Technical Report 3021, INRIA (1996).  
  28. R. Keriven and O. Faugeras, Variational principles, surface evolution, PDEs, level set methods and the stereo problem. IEEE Trans. Image Process.7 (1998) 336–344.  
  29. R. Kimmel and A.M. Bruckstein, Regularized Laplacian zero crossings as optimal edge integrators. IJCV53 (2003) 225–243.  
  30. E. Kuwert and R. Schätzle, The Willmore flow with small initial energy. J. Differential Geom.57 (2001) 409–441.  
  31. E. Kuwert and R. Schätzle, Gradient flow for the Willmore functional. Comm. Anal. Geom.10 (2002) 307–339.  
  32. E. Kuwert and R. Schätzle, Removability of point singularities of Willmore surfaces. Ann. Math.160 (2004) 315–357.  
  33. M. Laradji and O.G. Mouritsen, Elastic properties of surfactant monolayers at liquid-liquid interfaces: A molecular dynamics study. J. Chem. Phys.112 (2000) 8621–8630.  
  34. M. Leventon, O. Faugeraus and W. Grimson, Level set based segmentation with intensity and curvature priors, in Proceedings of Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis Proceedings (2000) 4–11.  
  35. G.B. McFadden, A.A. Wheeler, R.J. Braun, S.R. Coriell and R.F. Sekerka, Phase-field models for anisotropic interfaces. Phys. Rev. E48 (1993) 2016–2024.  
  36. J. Melenkevitz and S.H. Javadpour, Phase separation dynamics in mixtures containing surfactants. J. Chem. Phys.107 (1997) 623–629.  
  37. R. Rusu, An algorithm for the elastic flow of surfaces. Interfaces and Free Boundaries7 (2005) 229–239.  
  38. U. Seifert, Configurations of fluid membranes and vesicles. Adv. Phys.46 (1997) 13–137.  
  39. L. Simon, Existence of surfaces minimizing the Willmore functional. Comm. Anal. Geom.1 (1993) 281–326.  
  40. G. Simonett, The Willmore flow near spheres. Differential Integral Equations14 (2001) 1005–1014.  
  41. J. Sokołowski and J.-P. Zolésio, Introduction to Shape Optimization, Springer Series in Computational Mathematics16. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1992).  
  42. G. Sundaramoorthi, A. Yezzi, A. Mennucci and G. Sapiro, New possibilities with Sobolev active contours, in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Scale Space Methods and Variational Methods in Computer Vision (2007).  
  43. J.E. Taylor, Crystalline variational problems. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.84 (1978) 568–588.  
  44. J.E. Taylor, Mean curvature and weighted mean curvature. Acta Metall. Mater.40 (1992) 1475–1485.  
  45. J.E. Taylor and J.W. Cahn, Linking anisotropic sharp and diffuse surface motion laws via gradient flows. J. Stat. Phys.77 (1994) 183–197.  
  46. J.E. Taylor and J.W. Cahn, Diffuse interfaces with sharp corners and facets: Phase field modeling of strongly anisotropic surfaces. Physica D112 (1998) 381–411.  
  47. S.L. Veatch and S.L. Keller, Separation of liquid phases in giant vesicles of ternary mixtures of phospholipids and cholesterol. Biophys. J.85 (2003) 3074–3083.  
  48. A.A. Wheeler and G.B. McFadden, A ξ-vector formulation of anisotropic phase-field models: 3D asymptotics. Eur. J. Appl. Math.7 (1996) 367–381.  
  49. T.J. Willmore, Total curvature in Riemannian geometry. Ellis Horwood Series: Mathematics and its Applications, Ellis Horwood Ltd., Chichester (1982).  

NotesEmbed ?

top

You must be logged in to post comments.

To embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.

Only the controls for the widget will be shown in your chosen language. Notes will be shown in their authored language.

Tells the widget how many notes to show per page. You can cycle through additional notes using the next and previous controls.

    
                

                
Note: Best practice suggests putting the JavaScript code just before the closing </body> tag.