Heuristic and metaheuristic methods for computing graph treewidth

François Clautiaux; Aziz Moukrim; Stéphane Nègre[1]; Jacques Carlier

  • [1] Laboratoire de Recherche en Informatique d’Amiens, INSSET, 48 rue Raspail, 02100 St Quentin, France

RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle (2004)

  • Volume: 38, Issue: 1, page 13-26
  • ISSN: 0399-0559

Abstract

top
The notion of treewidth is of considerable interest in relation to NP-hard problems. Indeed, several studies have shown that the tree-decomposition method can be used to solve many basic optimization problems in polynomial time when treewidth is bounded, even if, for arbitrary graphs, computing the treewidth is NP-hard. Several papers present heuristics with computational experiments. For many graphs the discrepancy between the heuristic results and the best lower bounds is still very large. The aim of this paper is to propose two new methods for computing the treewidth of graphs: a heuristic and a metaheuristic. The heuristic returns good results in a short computation time, whereas the metaheuristic (a Tabu search method) returns the best results known to have been obtained so far for all the DIMACS vertex coloring / treewidth benchmarks (a well-known collection of graphs used for both vertex coloring and treewidth problems.) Our results actually improve on the previous best results for treewidth problems in 53% of the cases. Moreover, we identify properties of the triangulation process to optimize the computing time of our method.

How to cite

top

Clautiaux, François, et al. "Heuristic and metaheuristic methods for computing graph treewidth." RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle 38.1 (2004): 13-26. <http://eudml.org/doc/245101>.

@article{Clautiaux2004,
abstract = {The notion of treewidth is of considerable interest in relation to NP-hard problems. Indeed, several studies have shown that the tree-decomposition method can be used to solve many basic optimization problems in polynomial time when treewidth is bounded, even if, for arbitrary graphs, computing the treewidth is NP-hard. Several papers present heuristics with computational experiments. For many graphs the discrepancy between the heuristic results and the best lower bounds is still very large. The aim of this paper is to propose two new methods for computing the treewidth of graphs: a heuristic and a metaheuristic. The heuristic returns good results in a short computation time, whereas the metaheuristic (a Tabu search method) returns the best results known to have been obtained so far for all the DIMACS vertex coloring / treewidth benchmarks (a well-known collection of graphs used for both vertex coloring and treewidth problems.) Our results actually improve on the previous best results for treewidth problems in 53% of the cases. Moreover, we identify properties of the triangulation process to optimize the computing time of our method.},
affiliation = {Laboratoire de Recherche en Informatique d’Amiens, INSSET, 48 rue Raspail, 02100 St Quentin, France},
author = {Clautiaux, François, Moukrim, Aziz, Nègre, Stéphane, Carlier, Jacques},
journal = {RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle},
keywords = {treewidth; elimination orderings; triangulated graphs; heuristic; metaheuristic; computational experiments},
language = {eng},
number = {1},
pages = {13-26},
publisher = {EDP-Sciences},
title = {Heuristic and metaheuristic methods for computing graph treewidth},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/245101},
volume = {38},
year = {2004},
}

TY - JOUR
AU - Clautiaux, François
AU - Moukrim, Aziz
AU - Nègre, Stéphane
AU - Carlier, Jacques
TI - Heuristic and metaheuristic methods for computing graph treewidth
JO - RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle
PY - 2004
PB - EDP-Sciences
VL - 38
IS - 1
SP - 13
EP - 26
AB - The notion of treewidth is of considerable interest in relation to NP-hard problems. Indeed, several studies have shown that the tree-decomposition method can be used to solve many basic optimization problems in polynomial time when treewidth is bounded, even if, for arbitrary graphs, computing the treewidth is NP-hard. Several papers present heuristics with computational experiments. For many graphs the discrepancy between the heuristic results and the best lower bounds is still very large. The aim of this paper is to propose two new methods for computing the treewidth of graphs: a heuristic and a metaheuristic. The heuristic returns good results in a short computation time, whereas the metaheuristic (a Tabu search method) returns the best results known to have been obtained so far for all the DIMACS vertex coloring / treewidth benchmarks (a well-known collection of graphs used for both vertex coloring and treewidth problems.) Our results actually improve on the previous best results for treewidth problems in 53% of the cases. Moreover, we identify properties of the triangulation process to optimize the computing time of our method.
LA - eng
KW - treewidth; elimination orderings; triangulated graphs; heuristic; metaheuristic; computational experiments
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/245101
ER -

References

top
  1. [1] E. Aarts and J.K. Lenstra, Local Search in Combinatorial Optimization. Series in Discrete Mathematics and Optimization. John Wiley and Sons (1997). Zbl0869.00019MR1458630
  2. [2] R. Ahuja, O. Ergun, J. Orlin and A. Punnen, A survey on very large-scale neighborhood search techniques. Discrete Appl. Math. 123 (2002) 75-102. Zbl1014.68052MR1922331
  3. [3] S. Arnborg, D.G. Corneil and A. Proskurowski, Complexity of finding embeddings in a k-tree. SIAM J. Alg. Disc. Meth. 8 (1987) 277-284. Zbl0611.05022MR881187
  4. [4] S. Arnborg and A. Proskurowki, Characterisation and recognition of partial 3-trees. SIAM J. Alg. Disc. Meth. 7 (1986) 305-314. Zbl0597.05027MR830649
  5. [5] H. Bodlaender, A linear time algorithm for finding tree-decompositions of small treewidth. SIAM J. Comput. 25 (1996) 1305-1317. Zbl0864.68074MR1417901
  6. [6] J. Carlier and C. Lucet, A decomposition algorithm for network reliability evaluation. Discrete Appl. Math. 65 (1993) 141-156. Zbl0848.90058MR1380072
  7. [7] F. Clautiaux, J. Carlier, A. Moukrim and S. Nègre, New lower and upper bounds for graph treewidth. WEA 2003, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2647 (2003) 70-80. Zbl1023.68645MR2051951
  8. [8] F. Gavril, Algorithms for minimum coloring, maximum clique, minimum coloring cliques and maximum independent set of a chordal graph. SIAM J. Comput. 1 (1972) 180-187. Zbl0227.05116MR327580
  9. [9] F. Glover and M. Laguna, Tabu search. Kluwer Academic Publishers (1998). Zbl0930.90083MR1665424
  10. [10] M.C. Golumbic, Algorithmic Graph Theory and Perfect Graphs. Academic Press, New York (1980). Zbl0541.05054MR562306
  11. [11] F. Jensen, S. Lauritzen and K. Olesen, Bayesian updating in causal probabilistic networks by local computations. Comput. Statist. Quaterly 4 (1990) 269-282. Zbl0715.68076MR1073446
  12. [12] D.S. Johnson and M.A. Trick, The Second DIMACS Implementation Challenge: NP-Hard Problems: Maximum Clique, Graph Coloring, and Satisfiability. Series in Discrete Math. Theor. Comput. Sci. Amer. Math. Soc. (1993). 
  13. [13] A. Koster, Frequency Assignment, Models and Algorithms. Ph.D. Thesis, Universiteit Maastricht (1999). 
  14. [14] A. Koster, H. Bodlaender and S. van Hoesel, Treewidth: Computational experiments. Fund. Inform. 49 (2001) 301-312. MR2154596
  15. [15] C. Lucet, J.F. Manouvrier and J. Carlier, Evaluating network reliability and 2-edge-connected reliability in linear time for bounded pathwidth graphs. Algorithmica 27 (2000) 316-336. Zbl0971.68009MR1759753
  16. [16] C. Lucet, F. Mendes and A. Moukrim, Méthode de décomposition appliquée à la coloration de graphes, in ROADEF (2002). 
  17. [17] N. Robertson and P. Seymour, Graph minors. II. Algorithmic aspects of tree-width. J. Algorithms 7 (1986) 309-322. Zbl0611.05017MR855559
  18. [18] D. Rose, Triangulated graphs and the elimination process. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 32 (1970) 597-609. Zbl0216.02602MR270957
  19. [19] D. Rose, A graph-theoretic study of the numerical solution of sparse positive definite systems of linear equations, in Graph Theory and Computing, edited by R.C. Reed. Academic Press (1972) 183-217. Zbl0266.65028MR341833
  20. [20] D. Rose, R. Tarjan and G. Lueker, Algorithmic aspects of vertex elimination on graphs. SIAM J. Comput. 5 (1976) 146-160. Zbl0353.65019MR408312
  21. [21] R. Tarjan and M. Yannakakis, Simple linear-time algorithm to test chordality of graphs, test acyclicity of hypergraphs, and selectivity reduce acyclic hypergraphs. SIAM J. Comput. 13 (1984) 566-579. Zbl0545.68062MR749707

NotesEmbed ?

top

You must be logged in to post comments.