Comparing the succinctness of monadic query languages over finite trees

Martin Grohe; Nicole Schweikardt

RAIRO - Theoretical Informatics and Applications - Informatique Théorique et Applications (2004)

  • Volume: 38, Issue: 4, page 343-373
  • ISSN: 0988-3754

Abstract

top
We study the succinctness of monadic second-order logic and a variety of monadic fixed point logics on trees. All these languages are known to have the same expressive power on trees, but some can express the same queries much more succinctly than others. For example, we show that, under some complexity theoretic assumption, monadic second-order logic is non-elementarily more succinct than monadic least fixed point logic, which in turn is non-elementarily more succinct than monadic datalog. Succinctness of the languages is closely related to the combined and parameterised complexity of query evaluation for these languages.

How to cite

top

Grohe, Martin, and Schweikardt, Nicole. "Comparing the succinctness of monadic query languages over finite trees." RAIRO - Theoretical Informatics and Applications - Informatique Théorique et Applications 38.4 (2004): 343-373. <http://eudml.org/doc/245462>.

@article{Grohe2004,
abstract = {We study the succinctness of monadic second-order logic and a variety of monadic fixed point logics on trees. All these languages are known to have the same expressive power on trees, but some can express the same queries much more succinctly than others. For example, we show that, under some complexity theoretic assumption, monadic second-order logic is non-elementarily more succinct than monadic least fixed point logic, which in turn is non-elementarily more succinct than monadic datalog. Succinctness of the languages is closely related to the combined and parameterised complexity of query evaluation for these languages.},
author = {Grohe, Martin, Schweikardt, Nicole},
journal = {RAIRO - Theoretical Informatics and Applications - Informatique Théorique et Applications},
keywords = {monadic second-order logic; monadic least fixed point logic; full modal mu-calculus; stratified monadic datalog; monadic datalog; finite automata on labelled finite trees},
language = {eng},
number = {4},
pages = {343-373},
publisher = {EDP-Sciences},
title = {Comparing the succinctness of monadic query languages over finite trees},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/245462},
volume = {38},
year = {2004},
}

TY - JOUR
AU - Grohe, Martin
AU - Schweikardt, Nicole
TI - Comparing the succinctness of monadic query languages over finite trees
JO - RAIRO - Theoretical Informatics and Applications - Informatique Théorique et Applications
PY - 2004
PB - EDP-Sciences
VL - 38
IS - 4
SP - 343
EP - 373
AB - We study the succinctness of monadic second-order logic and a variety of monadic fixed point logics on trees. All these languages are known to have the same expressive power on trees, but some can express the same queries much more succinctly than others. For example, we show that, under some complexity theoretic assumption, monadic second-order logic is non-elementarily more succinct than monadic least fixed point logic, which in turn is non-elementarily more succinct than monadic datalog. Succinctness of the languages is closely related to the combined and parameterised complexity of query evaluation for these languages.
LA - eng
KW - monadic second-order logic; monadic least fixed point logic; full modal mu-calculus; stratified monadic datalog; monadic datalog; finite automata on labelled finite trees
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/245462
ER -

References

top
  1. [1] S. Abiteboul, P. Buneman and D. Suciu, Data on the Web: From Relations to Semistructured Data and XML. Morgan Kaufmann (1999). 
  2. [2] S. Abiteboul, R. Hull and V. Vianu, Foundations of databases. Addison-Wesley (1995). Zbl0848.68031
  3. [3] M. Adler and N. Immerman, An n ! lower bound on formula size. ACM Trans. Comput. Logic 4 (2003) 296–314. 
  4. [4] N. Alechina and N. Immerman, Reachability logic: An efficient fragment of transitive closure logic. Logic Journal of the IGPL 8 (2000) 325–338. Zbl0948.03022
  5. [5] A. Chandra and D. Harel, Structure and complexity of relational queries. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 25 (1982) 99–128. Zbl0511.68073
  6. [6] E. Dantsin, A. Goerdt, E.A. Hirsch, R. Kannan, J. Kleinberg, C. Papadimitriou, P. Raghavan and U. Schöning, A deterministic ( 2 - 2 / ( k + 1 ) ) n algorithm for k -SAT based on local search. Theor. Comput. Sci. 289 (2002) 69–83. Revised version of: Deterministic algorithms for k -SAT based on covering codes and local search, ICALP’00. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 1853. Zbl1061.68071
  7. [7] H.-D. Ebbinghaus and J. Flum, Finite Model Theory. Springer-Verlag, 2nd edition (1999). Zbl0932.03032MR1716820
  8. [8] K. Etessami, M.Y. Vardi and T. Wilke, First-order logic with two variables and unary temporal logic. Inform. Comput. 179 (2002) 279–295. Zbl1096.03013
  9. [9] R. Fagin, Monadic generalized spectra. Zeitschrift für mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 21 (1975) 89–96. Zbl0317.02054
  10. [10] M.F. Fernandez, J. Siméon and P. Wadler, An algebra for XML query, in Proc. of the 20th Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS’00), edited by S. Kapoor and S. Prasad, Springer-Verlag. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 1974 (2000) 11–45. Zbl1044.68577
  11. [11] M. Frick and M. Grohe, The complexity of first-order and monadic second-order logic revisited. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic, accepted (2004). Zbl1062.03032MR2092847
  12. [12] M. Frick, M. Grohe and C. Koch, Query evaluation on compressed trees, in Proc. of the 18th IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS’03) (2003) 188–197. 
  13. [13] G. Gottlob and C. Koch, Monadic datalog and the expressive power of web information extraction languages. J. ACM 51 (2004) 74–113. Zbl1316.68045
  14. [14] E. Grädel and M. Otto, On Logics with Two Variables. Theor. Comput. Sci. 224 (1999) 73–113. Zbl0948.03023
  15. [15] M. Grohe and N. Schweikardt, Comparing the succinctness of monadic query languages over finite trees, in Proc. of the 17th International Workshop on Computer Science Logic (CSL’03), Springer-Verlag. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2803 (2003) 226–240. Zbl1116.03327
  16. [16] M. Grohe and N. Schweikardt, Comparing the succinctness of monadic query languages over finite trees. Technical Report EDI-INF-RR-0168, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK (2003). Zbl1116.03327MR2047963
  17. [17] M. Grohe and N. Schweikardt, The succinctness of first-order logic on linear orders, in Proc. of the 19th IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS’04) (2004) 438–447. Zbl1125.03024
  18. [18] H. Hosoya and B.C. Pierce, XDuce: A typed XML processing language (preliminary report), in International Workshop on the Web and Databases, edited by D. Suciu and G. Vossen (2000). Reprinted in The Web and Databases, Selected Papers, Springer. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 1997 (2001). 
  19. [19] N. Immerman, Descriptive Complexity. Springer-Verlag (1999). Zbl0918.68031MR1732784
  20. [20] H. Kamp, Tense Logic and the theory of linear order. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Los Angeles (1968). 
  21. [21] C. Koch, Efficient processing of expressive node-selecting queries on XML data in secondary storage: A tree-automata based approach, in VLDB’03: 29th Conference on Very Large Databases, Berlin, September (2003) 249-260. 
  22. [22] F. Neven, Design and Analysis of Query Languages for Structured Documents – A Formal and Logical Approach. Ph.D. Thesis, Limburgs Universitair Centrum (1999). 
  23. [23] F. Neven and T. Schwentick, Query automata over finite trees. Theor. Comput. Sci. 275 (2002) 633–674. Zbl1026.68081
  24. [24] W. Thomas, Languages, automata, and logic, in Handbook of formal languages 3 (1996), edited by G. Rozenberg and A. Salomaa, Springer, New York. MR1470024
  25. [25] M.Y. Vardi, Reasoning about the past with two-way automata, in 25th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP’98), edited by K.G. Larsen, S. Skyum and G. Winskel, Springer-Verlag. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 1443 (1998) 628–641. Zbl0909.03019
  26. [26] T. Wilke, CTL + is exponentially more succinct than CTL, in Proc. of the 19th Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS’99), Springer-Verlag. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 1738 (1999) 110–121. Zbl0952.03017

NotesEmbed ?

top

You must be logged in to post comments.

To embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.

Only the controls for the widget will be shown in your chosen language. Notes will be shown in their authored language.

Tells the widget how many notes to show per page. You can cycle through additional notes using the next and previous controls.

    
                

Note: Best practice suggests putting the JavaScript code just before the closing </body> tag.