Deuteronomic Texts: Late Antiquity and the History of Mathematics

 Access to full text

 Full (PDF)

1. [1] Brashear ( William) [1994] Vier neue Texte zum antiken Bildungswesen, Archiv für Papyrusforschung, 40 (1994), pp.29–35. 
2. [2] Brentjes ( Sonja) [Ms.] Additions to Book I in the Arabic Traditions of Euclid’s Elements, Max-Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin. 
3. [3] Chemla ( Karine) [1992] Résonances entre démonstration et procédure: Remarques sur le commentaire de Liu Hui (IIIe siècle) aux Neuf Chapitres sur les Procédures Mathématiques (Ier siècle), Extrême-Orient, Extrême-Occident, 14 (1992), p.91–129. 
4. [4] Carroll ( Lewis) [1895] What the tortoise said to Achilles, Mind, 1895, pp.278–280. MR1360394
5. [5] Corry ( Leo) [1989] Linearity and Reflexivity in the Growth of Mathematical Knowledge, Science in Context, 3 (1989), pp.409-440. Zbl1181.00007
6. [6] Cuomo ( Serafina) [forthcoming] The Faces of Mathematics in Late Antiquity: Notes on Pappus of Alexandria’s Mathematical Collection. Cambridge, forthcoming. 
7. [7] Dodge ( Bayard), tr. [1970] The Fihrist of al-Nadim; a Tenth-Century Survey of Muslim Culture, New York, 1970. 
8. [8] Fowler ( David H.F.) [1987] The Mathematics of Plato’s Academy, Oxford, 1987. Zbl0627.01002
9. [9] Friedlein ( Gottfried), ed. [1873] Procli Diadochi In Primum Euclidis Elementorum Librum Commentarii, Leipzig, 1873. JFM05.0003.03
10. [10] Goldstein ( Catherine) [1995] Un théorème de Fermat et ses lecteurs, Saint-Denis: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes, 1995 Zbl0879.01013MR1351497
11. [11] Heath ( Thomas L.) [1956] The Thirteen Books of Euclid’s Elements, réimpr. de la 2e éd., New-York : Dover Publ., 1956. Zbl1026.01024MR75873
12. [12] Heiberg ( Johan Ludwig), ed. [1883] Euclidis Elementa, Leipzig, 1883. 
13. [13] Heiberg ( Johan Ludwig), ed. [1895] Euclidis Optica, Leipzig, 1895. 
14. [14] Heiberg ( Johan Ludwig), ed. [1910] Archimedis Opera Vol. I, Leipzig, 1910. 
15. [15] Heiberg ( Johan Ludwig), ed. [1913] Archimedis Opera Vol. III, Leipzig, 1913. 
16. [16] Heiberg ( Johan L.), Besthorn ( Rasmus O.), eds. [1900] Codex Leidensis 399, 1 Vol. II, Copenhagen, 1900. 
17. [17] Hogendijk ( Jan P.) [1985] Ibn Al-Haytham’s Completion of the Conics, New York, 1985. Zbl0562.01003MR769652
18. [18] HØyrup ( Jens) [1990] Algebra and Naive Geometry. An Investigation of Some Basic Aspects of Old Babylonian Mathematical Thought, Altorientalische Forschungen, 17 (1990), pp.27–69, 262–354. 
19. [19] Jones ( Alexander) [1986] Book 7 of the Collection / Pappus of Alexandria, New York, 1986. MR816533
20. [20] Jones ( Alexander) [1994] Peripatetic and Euclidean Theories of the Visual Ray, Physis, 31 (1994), pp.47-76. Zbl0806.01003MR1343198
21. [21] Knorr ( Wilbur R.) [1986] The Ancient Tradition of Geometric Problems, Boston: Birkhäuser, 1986. Zbl0588.01002MR884893
22. [22] Knorr ( Wilbur R.) [1989] Textual Studies in Ancient and Medieval Geometry, Boston: Birkhäuser, 1989. Zbl0684.01002MR1029522
23. [23] Knorr ( Wilbur R.) [1994] Pseudo-Euclidean Reflections in Ancient Optics: a Re-examination of Textual Issues Pertaining to the Euclidean Optica and Catoptrica, Physis, 31 (1994), pp.1–45. Zbl0806.01004MR1343197
24. [24] Knorr ( Wilbur R.) [1996] The Wrong Text of Euclid: on Heiberg’s Text and its Alternatives, Centaurus, 38 (1996), pp.208–276. Zbl0861.01014MR1384401
25. [25] Mau ( Jürgen), Mueller ( W.) [1962] Mathematische Ostraka aus der Berliner Sammlung, Archiv für Papyrusforschung, 17 (1962), pp.1–10. Zbl0095.00106
26. [26] Morrow ( Glenn R.), tr. [1992] Proclus: a Commentary on the First Book of Euclid’s Elements, Princeton, 1992. Zbl0229.01002MR1200456
27. [27] Mueller ( Ian) [1981] Philosophy of Mathematics and Deductive Structure in Euclid’s Elements, Cambridge MA, 1981. Zbl0582.01003
28. [28] Netz ( Reviel) [1999a] Archimedes Transformed: the Case of a Result Stating a Maximum for a Cubic Equation, Archive for the History of Exact Sciences, 54 (1999), pp.1–50. Zbl0928.01004MR1697182
29. [29] Netz ( Reviel) [1999b] The Shaping of Deduction in Greek Mathematics: a Study in Cognitive History. Cambridge, 1999. Zbl1025.01002MR1683176
30. [30] Netz ( Reviel) [forthcoming] Proclus’ Division of the Mathematical Proposition into Parts: how and why was it Formulated?, Classical Quarterly. MR1785350
31. [31] Saito ( Ken) [1997] Index of the Propositions Used in Book 7 of Pappus’ Collection, Jinbun Kenkyu: The Journal of Humanities (Faculty of Letters, Chiba University), 26 (1997), pp.155–188. MR1694371
32. [32] Toomer ( Gerald J.) [1984] Ptolemy’s Almagest, London, 1984. MR731698
33. [33] Toomer ( Gerald J.) [1990] Conics: Books V to VII / Apollonius: The Arabic Translation, New York. MR1053158
34. [34] Turner ( Eric G.), Fowler ( David H.F.), Koenen ( Ludwig), Youtie ( Louise C.) [1985] Euclid, Elements I, Definitions 1–10 (P.Mich. iii 143), Yale Classical Studies, 28 (1985), pp.13–24. 
35. [35] Unguru ( Sabetai) [1975] On the Need to Rewrite the History of Greek Mathematics, Archive for the History of Exact Sciences, 15 (1975), pp.67–114. Zbl0325.01002MR504604
36. [36] Unguru ( Sabetai) [1979] History of Ancient Mathematics: Some Reflections on the State of the Art, Isis, 70 (1979), pp.555–564. Zbl0424.01003MR550033

1. Alain Bernard, Comment définir la nature des textes mathématiques de l’Antiquité grecque tardive ? Proposition de réforme de la notion de ‘textes deutéronomiques’
2. Karine Chemla, Commentaires, éditions et autres textes seconds : quel enjeu pour l’histoire des mathématiques ? Réflexions inspirées par la note de Reviel Netz
3. Reviel Netz, A Programmatic Note: on two Types of Intertextuality