Can ( p ) ever be amenable?

Matthew Daws; Volker Runde

Studia Mathematica (2008)

  • Volume: 188, Issue: 2, page 151-174
  • ISSN: 0039-3223

Abstract

top
It is known that ( p ) is not amenable for p = 1,2,∞, but whether or not ( p ) is amenable for p ∈ (1,∞) ∖ 2 is an open problem. We show that, if ( p ) is amenable for p ∈ (1,∞), then so are ( ( p ) ) and ( ( p ) ) . Moreover, if ( ( p ) ) is amenable so is ( , ( E ) ) for any index set and for any infinite-dimensional p -space E; in particular, if ( ( p ) ) is amenable for p ∈ (1,∞), then so is ( ( p ² ) ) . We show that ( ( p ² ) ) is not amenable for p = 1,∞, but also that our methods fail us if p ∈ (1,∞). Finally, for p ∈ (1,2) and a free ultrafilter over ℕ, we exhibit a closed left ideal of ( ( p ) ) lacking a right approximate identity, but enjoying a certain very weak complementation property.

How to cite

top

Matthew Daws, and Volker Runde. "Can $ℬ(ℓ^{p})$ ever be amenable?." Studia Mathematica 188.2 (2008): 151-174. <http://eudml.org/doc/284734>.

@article{MatthewDaws2008,
abstract = {It is known that $ℬ(ℓ^\{p\})$ is not amenable for p = 1,2,∞, but whether or not $ℬ(ℓ^\{p\})$ is amenable for p ∈ (1,∞) ∖ 2 is an open problem. We show that, if $ℬ(ℓ^\{p\})$ is amenable for p ∈ (1,∞), then so are $ℓ^\{∞\}(ℬ(ℓ^\{p\}))$ and $ℓ^\{∞\}((ℓ^\{p\}))$. Moreover, if $ℓ^\{∞\}((ℓ^\{p\}))$ is amenable so is $ℓ^\{∞\}(,(E))$ for any index set and for any infinite-dimensional $ℒ^\{p\}$-space E; in particular, if $ℓ^\{∞\}((ℓ^\{p\}))$ is amenable for p ∈ (1,∞), then so is $ℓ^\{∞\}((ℓ^\{p\} ⊕ ℓ²))$. We show that $ℓ^\{∞\}((ℓ^\{p\} ⊕ ℓ²))$ is not amenable for p = 1,∞, but also that our methods fail us if p ∈ (1,∞). Finally, for p ∈ (1,2) and a free ultrafilter over ℕ, we exhibit a closed left ideal of $((ℓ^\{p\}))_\{\}$ lacking a right approximate identity, but enjoying a certain very weak complementation property.},
author = {Matthew Daws, Volker Runde},
journal = {Studia Mathematica},
keywords = {amenability; -spaces; maximal operator ideals; ultra-amenability},
language = {eng},
number = {2},
pages = {151-174},
title = {Can $ℬ(ℓ^\{p\})$ ever be amenable?},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/284734},
volume = {188},
year = {2008},
}

TY - JOUR
AU - Matthew Daws
AU - Volker Runde
TI - Can $ℬ(ℓ^{p})$ ever be amenable?
JO - Studia Mathematica
PY - 2008
VL - 188
IS - 2
SP - 151
EP - 174
AB - It is known that $ℬ(ℓ^{p})$ is not amenable for p = 1,2,∞, but whether or not $ℬ(ℓ^{p})$ is amenable for p ∈ (1,∞) ∖ 2 is an open problem. We show that, if $ℬ(ℓ^{p})$ is amenable for p ∈ (1,∞), then so are $ℓ^{∞}(ℬ(ℓ^{p}))$ and $ℓ^{∞}((ℓ^{p}))$. Moreover, if $ℓ^{∞}((ℓ^{p}))$ is amenable so is $ℓ^{∞}(,(E))$ for any index set and for any infinite-dimensional $ℒ^{p}$-space E; in particular, if $ℓ^{∞}((ℓ^{p}))$ is amenable for p ∈ (1,∞), then so is $ℓ^{∞}((ℓ^{p} ⊕ ℓ²))$. We show that $ℓ^{∞}((ℓ^{p} ⊕ ℓ²))$ is not amenable for p = 1,∞, but also that our methods fail us if p ∈ (1,∞). Finally, for p ∈ (1,2) and a free ultrafilter over ℕ, we exhibit a closed left ideal of $((ℓ^{p}))_{}$ lacking a right approximate identity, but enjoying a certain very weak complementation property.
LA - eng
KW - amenability; -spaces; maximal operator ideals; ultra-amenability
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/284734
ER -

NotesEmbed ?

top

You must be logged in to post comments.

To embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.

Only the controls for the widget will be shown in your chosen language. Notes will be shown in their authored language.

Tells the widget how many notes to show per page. You can cycle through additional notes using the next and previous controls.

    
                

Note: Best practice suggests putting the JavaScript code just before the closing </body> tag.