A Hanf number for saturation and omission
John T. Baldwin; Saharon Shelah
Fundamenta Mathematicae (2011)
- Volume: 213, Issue: 3, page 255-270
- ISSN: 0016-2736
Access Full Article
topAbstract
topHow to cite
topJohn T. Baldwin, and Saharon Shelah. "A Hanf number for saturation and omission." Fundamenta Mathematicae 213.3 (2011): 255-270. <http://eudml.org/doc/286236>.
@article{JohnT2011,
	abstract = {Suppose t = (T,T₁,p) is a triple of two countable theories T ⊆ T₁ in vocabularies τ ⊂ τ₁ and a τ₁-type p over the empty set. We show that the Hanf number for the property ’there is a model M₁ of T₁ which omits p, but M₁ ↾ τ is saturated’ is essentially equal to the Löwenheim number of second order logic. In Section 4 we make exact computations of these Hanf numbers and note some distinctions between ’first order’ and ’second order quantification’. In particular, we show that if κ is uncountable, then $h³(L_\{ω,ω\}(Q),κ) = h³(L_\{ω₁,ω\},κ)$, where h³ is the ’normal’ notion of Hanf function (Definition 4.12).},
	author = {John T. Baldwin, Saharon Shelah},
	journal = {Fundamenta Mathematicae},
	keywords = {Hanf number; second-order logic; saturated models; omitting types},
	language = {eng},
	number = {3},
	pages = {255-270},
	title = {A Hanf number for saturation and omission},
	url = {http://eudml.org/doc/286236},
	volume = {213},
	year = {2011},
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - John T. Baldwin
AU  - Saharon Shelah
TI  - A Hanf number for saturation and omission
JO  - Fundamenta Mathematicae
PY  - 2011
VL  - 213
IS  - 3
SP  - 255
EP  - 270
AB  - Suppose t = (T,T₁,p) is a triple of two countable theories T ⊆ T₁ in vocabularies τ ⊂ τ₁ and a τ₁-type p over the empty set. We show that the Hanf number for the property ’there is a model M₁ of T₁ which omits p, but M₁ ↾ τ is saturated’ is essentially equal to the Löwenheim number of second order logic. In Section 4 we make exact computations of these Hanf numbers and note some distinctions between ’first order’ and ’second order quantification’. In particular, we show that if κ is uncountable, then $h³(L_{ω,ω}(Q),κ) = h³(L_{ω₁,ω},κ)$, where h³ is the ’normal’ notion of Hanf function (Definition 4.12).
LA  - eng
KW  - Hanf number; second-order logic; saturated models; omitting types
UR  - http://eudml.org/doc/286236
ER  - 
NotesEmbed ?
topTo embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.
 
 