The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
Lower Bounds for Las Vegas Automata
by Information Theory
We show that the size of a Las Vegas automaton
and the size of a complete, minimal deterministic
automaton accepting a regular
language are polynomially related. More precisely, we show
that if a regular language L is accepted by a
Las Vegas automaton having r states such that
the probability for a definite answer to occur is at least p,
then r ≥ np, where n is the number of the states
of the minimal deterministic automaton accepting L.
Earlier this result has been obtained
in [2] by using a reduction to one-way Las Vegas communication
protocols, but here we give a direct proof based on information theory.
Hirvensalo, Mika, and Seibert, Sebastian. "Lower Bounds for Las Vegas Automata by Information Theory." RAIRO - Theoretical Informatics and Applications 37.1 (2010): 39-49. <http://eudml.org/doc/92712>.
@article{Hirvensalo2010,
abstract = {
We show that the size of a Las Vegas automaton
and the size of a complete, minimal deterministic
automaton accepting a regular
language are polynomially related. More precisely, we show
that if a regular language L is accepted by a
Las Vegas automaton having r states such that
the probability for a definite answer to occur is at least p,
then r ≥ np, where n is the number of the states
of the minimal deterministic automaton accepting L.
Earlier this result has been obtained
in [2] by using a reduction to one-way Las Vegas communication
protocols, but here we give a direct proof based on information theory.
},
author = {Hirvensalo, Mika, Seibert, Sebastian},
journal = {RAIRO - Theoretical Informatics and Applications},
keywords = {Las Vegas automata; information theory},
language = {eng},
month = {3},
number = {1},
pages = {39-49},
publisher = {EDP Sciences},
title = {Lower Bounds for Las Vegas Automata by Information Theory},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/92712},
volume = {37},
year = {2010},
}
TY - JOUR
AU - Hirvensalo, Mika
AU - Seibert, Sebastian
TI - Lower Bounds for Las Vegas Automata by Information Theory
JO - RAIRO - Theoretical Informatics and Applications
DA - 2010/3//
PB - EDP Sciences
VL - 37
IS - 1
SP - 39
EP - 49
AB -
We show that the size of a Las Vegas automaton
and the size of a complete, minimal deterministic
automaton accepting a regular
language are polynomially related. More precisely, we show
that if a regular language L is accepted by a
Las Vegas automaton having r states such that
the probability for a definite answer to occur is at least p,
then r ≥ np, where n is the number of the states
of the minimal deterministic automaton accepting L.
Earlier this result has been obtained
in [2] by using a reduction to one-way Las Vegas communication
protocols, but here we give a direct proof based on information theory.
LA - eng
KW - Las Vegas automata; information theory
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/92712
ER -
-
T.M. Cover and J.A. Thomas, Elements of Information Theory. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (1991).
-
P. Duris, J. Hromkovic, J.D.P. Rolim and G. Schnitger, Las Vegas Versus Determinism for One-way Communication Complexity, Finite Automata, and Polynomial-time Computations. Springer, Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci. 1200 (1997) 117-128.
-
J. Hromkovic, personal communication.
-
H. Klauck, On quantum and probabilistic communication: Las Vegas and one-way protocols, in Proc. of the ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (2000) 644-651.
-
C.H. Papadimitriou, Computational Complexity. Addison-Wesley (1994).
-
S. Yu, Regular Languages, edited by G. Rozenberg and A. Salomaa. Springer, Handb. Formal Languages I (1997).
Citations in EuDML Documents
top
You must be logged in to post comments.
To embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.