Note sur le calcul de la probabilité des paradoxes du vote

 Access to full text

 Full (PDF)

1. Arrow K.J., Social choice and individual value, New York, Wiley, 1963. Zbl0984.91513
2. Berg S., "Paradox of voting under an urn model : the effect of homogeneity", Public Choice, 47, (1985a), 377-387. 
3. Berg S., "A note on plurality distorsion in large committees", European Journal of Political Economy, 1, (1985b), 271-284. 
4. Berg S., "The probability of casting a decisive vote : the effects of a caucus", Public Choice, 64, (1990), 73-92. 
5. Berg S. et B. Bjurulf, "A note on the paradox of voting : anonymous preference profiles and May's formula", Public Choice, 40, (1983), 307-316. 
6. Berg S. et D. Lepelley, "Voting cycles, plurality rule and strategic manipulation", Annals of Operations Research, 23, (1990), 247-256. Zbl0723.90005MR1066335
7. Borda J.C. (de), "Mémoire sur les élections au scrutin", Histoire de l'académie royale des sciences, Paris, 1781. 
8. Condorcet M.J.A. (Marquis de), Essai sur l'application de l'analyse à la probabilité des décisions rendues à la pluralité des voix, Paris, 1785. Zbl16.0247.01
9. Feller W., An introduction to probability theory and its applications, New York, Wiley, 1957. Zbl0077.12201MR88081
10. Fishburn P.C., "Monotonicity paradox in the theory of elections", Discrete Applied Mathematics, 4, (1982), 119-134. Zbl0475.90009MR677878
11. Fishburn P.C. et W.V. Gehrlein, "Majorities efficiencies for simple voting procedures", Theory and Decision, 14, (1982), 141-153. Zbl0482.90006MR665582
12. Gehrlein W.V., "Single-stage election procedures for large electorates", Journal of Mathematical Economics, 8, (1981), 263-275. Zbl0461.90005MR631008
13. Gehrlein W.V., "Condorcet efficiency and constant scoring rules", Mathematical Social Sciences, 2, (1982), 123-130. Zbl0479.90015
14. Gehrlein W.V., "Condorcet's paradox", Theory and Decision, 15, (1983), 161-197. Zbl0512.90009MR709402
15. Gehrlein W.V., A variant interpretation of the impartial anonymous culture condition, document dactylographié, University of Delaware, 1984. 
16. Gehrlein W.V., "The expected likelihood of transitivity for a probabilistic chooser", Annals of Operations Research, 23, (1990), 235-246. Zbl0708.90004MR1066334
17. Gehrlein W.V., "Coincidence probabilities for simple majority and proportional lottery rules", Economics Letters, 35, (1991), 349-353. Zbl0725.90021
18. Gehrlein W.V., "Condorcet efficiency and social homogeneity", papier presenté au premier meeting de la "Society for Social Choice and Welfare", Caen, 1992. Zbl0905.90006
19. Gehrlein W.V. et S. Berg, "The effect of social homogeneity on coincidence probabilities for pairwise proportional lottery and simple majority rule", à paraître dans Social Choice and Welfare, 1992. Zbl0761.90005MR1195112
20. Gehrlein W.V. et P.C. Fishburn, "The probability of the paradox of voting : a computable solution", Journal of Economic Theory, 13, (1976a), 14-25. Zbl0351.90002MR443842
21. Gehrlein W.V. et P.C. Fishburn, "Condorcet's paradox and anonymous preference profiles", Public Choice, 26, (1976b), 1-18. 
22. Gehrlein W.V. et P.C. Fishburn, "Coincidence probabilities for simple majority and positionalist voting rules", Social Science Research7, (1978), 272-283. 
23. Gehrlein W.V. et P.C. Fishburn, "Effects of abstentions on voting procedures in three-alternative elections", Behavioral Science24, (1979), 346-354. 
24. Gehrlein W.V. et P.C. Fishburn, "Scoring rule sensitivity to weight selection", Public Choice,40, (1983), 249-261. 
25. Gibbard A., "Manipulation of voting schemes : a general result", Econometrica, 41, (1973),587-601. Zbl0325.90081MR441407
26. Gillett R., "Collective Indecision", Behavioral Science, 22, (1977), 383-390. 
27. Gillett R., "The comparative likelihood of an equivocal outcome under plurality, Condorcet and Borda voting procedures", Public choice, 35, (1980), 483-491. 
28. Guilbaud G.Th., "Les théories de l'intérêt général et le problème logique de l'agrégation ", Économie Appliquée, 5, (1952), 501-584. 
29. Johnson N.L. et S. Kotz, Urns models and their application, New York, Wiley, 1977. Zbl0352.60001MR488211
30. Kreweras G., "Les décisions collectives", Mathématiques et Sciences Humaines, 2, (1962), 25-35. 
31. Lepelley D., Remarques sur les calculs de probabilité dans la théorie des choix collectifs, document dactylographié, Université de Caen, 1984. 
32. Lepelley D., Contribution à l'analyse des procédures de décision collective, Thèse de doctorat, Université de Caen, 1989. 
33. Lepelley D., "On the probability of electing the Condorcet Loser", à paraître dans Mathematical Social Sciences, 1992. Zbl0769.90026MR1203962
34. Lepelley D. et B. Mbih, "The proportion of coalitionally unstable situations under the plurality rule", Economics Letters, 24, (1987), 311-315. Zbl1328.91073MR919264
35. Lepelley D. et B. Mbih, The vulnerability of four social choice functions to coalitional manipulation of preferences, document dactylographié, Université de Caen, 1992. Zbl0822.90006
36. May R.M., "Some mathematical remarks on the paradox of voting", Behavioral Science, 16, (1971), 143-151. 
37. Merrill S., Making multicandidate elections more democratic, Princeton [University Press, 1988. 
38. Moulin H., "Condorcet's principle implies the no show paradox", Journal of Economic Theory, 45, (1988), 53-64. Zbl0649.90010MR949068
39. Niemi R.G. et W.H. Riker, "The choice of voting systems", Scientific American, 234 (1976), 21-27 
40. Nitzan S., "The vulnerability of point-voting schemes to preference variation and strategic manipulation", Public choice, 47 (1985) 249-270. 
41. Nurmi H., "Probability models in constitutional choice", European Journal of Political Economy, 6, (1990), 107-117. 
42. Nurmi H. et Y. Uusi-Heikkila, "Computer simulations of approval and plurality voting : the frequency of weak Pareto violations and Condorcet losers choice in impartial culture", European Journal of Political Economy, 2/1, (1985), 47-59. 
43. Paris D.C., "Plurality distorsion and majority rule", Behavioral Science, 20, (1975), 125-133. 
44. Peleg B., "A note on manipulability of large voting schemes", Theory and Decision, 11, (1979), 401-412. Zbl0417.90019MR558011
45. Satterthwaite M.A., "Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions : existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions", Journal of Economic Theory, 10, (1975), 187-217. Zbl0315.90088MR414051
46. Smith J.H., "Aggregation of preferences with variable electorates", Econometrica, 41, (1973), 1027-1041. Zbl0286.90008MR441227
47. Young H.P., "Social choice scoring functions", SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics, 28, (1975), 824-838. Zbl0277.92007MR371438