Advanced Search

Consider the first order linear difference equation with general advanced argument and variable coefficients of the form $$\nabla x\left(n\right)-p\left(n\right)x\left(\tau \right(n\left)\right)=0,n⩾1,$$ where p(n) is a sequence of nonnegative real numbers, τ(n) is a sequence of positive integers such that $$\tau \left(n\right)⩾n+1,n⩾1,$$ and ▿ denotes the backward difference operator ▿x(n) = x(n) − x(n − 1). Sufficient conditions which guarantee that all solutions oscillate are established. Examples illustrating the results are given.

A well-known shadowing theorem for ordinary differential equations is generalized to delay differential equations. It is shown that a linear autonomous delay differential equation is shadowable if and only if its characteristic equation has no root on the imaginary axis. The proof is based on the decomposition theory of linear delay differential equations.

Consider the difference equation $$\Delta x\left(n\right)+\sum _{i=1}^m{p}_i\left(n\right)x\left({\tau }_i\left(n\right)\right)=0,n\ge 0\left[\nabla x\left(n\right)-\sum _{i=1}^m{p}_i\left(n\right)x\left({\sigma }_i\left(n\right)\right)=0,n\ge 1\right],$$ where $\left(p_i\left(n\right)\right)$, $1\le i\le m$ are sequences of nonnegative real numbers, ${\tau }_i\left(n\right)$ [${\sigma }_i\left(n\right)$], $1\le i\le m$ are general retarded (advanced) arguments and $\Delta$ [$\nabla$] denotes the forward (backward) difference operator $\Delta x\left(n\right)=x(n+1)-x\left(n\right)$ [$\nabla x\left(n\right)=x\left(n\right)-x(n-1)$]. New oscillation criteria are established when the well-known oscillation conditions $$\underset{n\to \infty }{lim\; sup}\sum _{i=1}^m\sum _{j=\tau \left(n\right)}^n{p}_i\left(j\right)>1\left[\underset{n\to \infty }{lim\; sup}\sum _{i=1}^m\sum _{j=n}^{\sigma \left(n\right)}{p}_i\left(j\right)>1\right]$$ and $$\underset{n\to \infty }{lim\; inf}\sum _{i=1}^m\sum _{j={\tau }_i\left(n\right)}^{n-1}{p}_i\left(j\right)>\frac{1}{\mathrm{e}}\left[\underset{n\to \infty }{lim\; inf}\sum _{i=1}^m\sum _{j=n+1}^{{\sigma }_i\left(n\right)}{p}_i\left(j\right)>\frac{1}{\mathrm{e}}\right]$$ are not satisfied. Here $\tau \left(n\right)={max}_{1\le i\le m}{\tau }_i\left(n\right)$ $[\sigma \left(n\right)={min}_{1\le i\le m}{\sigma }_i\left(n\right)]$. The results obtained essentially improve known results in the literature. Examples illustrating the results are also given.

Sufficient conditions are established for the oscillation of proper solutions of the system $$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill u_1^{\text{'}}\left(t\right)& =p\left(t\right)u_2\left(\sigma \left(t\right)\right),\hfill \\ \hfill u_2^{\text{'}}\left(t\right)& =-q\left(t\right)u_1\left(\tau \left(t\right)\right),\hfill \end{array}$$ where $p,q:R_{+}\to R_{+}$ are locally summable functions, while $\tau$ and $\sigma :R_{+}\to R_{+}$ are continuous and continuously differentiable functions, respectively, and $\underset{t\to +\infty }{lim}\tau \left(t\right)=+\infty$, $\underset{t\to +\infty }{lim}\sigma \left(t\right)=+\infty$.