Advanced Search

Let k ≥ 2 be an integer. A function f: V(G) → −1, 1 defined on the vertex set V(G) of a graph G is a signed k-independence function if the sum of its function values over any closed neighborhood is at most k − 1. That is, Σx∈N[v] f(x) ≤ k − 1 for every v ∈ V(G), where N[v] consists of v and every vertex adjacent to v. The weight of a signed k-independence function f is w(f) = Σv∈V(G) f(v). The maximum weight w(f), taken over all signed k-independence functions f on G, is the signed k-independence...

Let G be a graph with vertex set V (G), and let f : V (G) → {−1, 1} be a two-valued function. If k ≥ 1 is an integer and Σx∈N(v) f(x) ≥ k for each v ∈ V (G), where N(v) is the neighborhood of v, then f is a signed total k-dominating function on G. A set {f1, f2, . . . , fd} of distinct signed total k-dominating functions on G with the property that Σdi=1 fi(x) ≤ k for each x ∈ V (G), is called a signed total (k, k)-dominating family (of functions) on G. The maximum number of functions in a signed...

Let G be a finite and simple graph with vertex set V (G), and let f V (G) → {−1, 1} be a two-valued function. If ∑x∈N|v| f(x) ≤ 1 for each v ∈ V (G), where N[v] is the closed neighborhood of v, then f is a signed 2-independence function on G. The weight of a signed 2-independence function f is w(f) =∑v∈V (G) f(v). The maximum of weights w(f), taken over all signed 2-independence functions f on G, is the signed 2-independence number α2s(G) of G. In this work, we mainly present upper bounds on α2s(G),...

Let D be a finite and simple digraph with the vertex set V(D), and let f:V(D) → -1,1 be a two-valued function. If ${\sum }_{x\in N¯\left[v\right]}f\left(x\right)\ge 1$ for each v ∈ V(D), where N¯[v] consists of v and all vertices of D from which arcs go into v, then f is a signed dominating function on D. The sum f(V(D)) is called the weight w(f) of f. The minimum of weights w(f), taken over all signed dominating functions f on D, is the signed domination number ${\gamma }_S\left(D\right)$ of D. A set $f₁,f₂,...,f_d$ of signed dominating functions on D with the property that ${\sum }_{i=1}^d{f}_i\left(x\right)\le 1$ for each...

We consider finite graphs G with vertex set V(G). For a subset S ⊆ V(G), we define by G[S] the subgraph induced by S. By n(G) = |V(G) | and δ(G) we denote the order and the minimum degree of G, respectively. Let k be a positive integer. A subset S ⊆ V(G) is a connected global offensive k-alliance of the connected graph G, if G[S] is connected and |N(v) ∩ S | ≥ |N(v) -S | + k for every vertex v ∈ V(G) -S, where N(v) is the neighborhood of v. The connected global offensive k-alliance number $\gamma {ₒ}^{k,c}\left(G\right)$ is the...

Let $G$ be a graph with vertex set $V\left(G\right)$, and let $k\ge 1$ be an integer. A subset $D\subseteq V\left(G\right)$ is called a if every vertex $v\in V\left(G\right)-D$ has at least $k$ neighbors in $D$. The $k$-domination number ${\gamma }_k\left(G\right)$ of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a $k$-dominating set in $G$. If $G$ is a graph with minimum degree $\delta \left(G\right)\ge k+1$, then we prove that $${\gamma }_{k+1}\left(G\right)\le \frac{\left|V\left(G\right)\right|+{\gamma }_k\left(G\right)}{2}.$$ In addition, we present a characterization of a special class of graphs attaining equality in this inequality.

Let k ≥ 1 be an integer. A signed total Roman k-dominating function on a graph G is a function f : V (G) → {−1, 1, 2} such that Ʃu2N(v) f(u) ≥ k for every v ∈ V (G), where N(v) is the neighborhood of v, and every vertex u ∈ V (G) for which f(u) = −1 is adjacent to at least one vertex w for which f(w) = 2. A set {f1, f2, . . . , fd} of distinct signed total Roman k-dominating functions on G with the property that Ʃdi=1 fi(v) ≤ k for each v ∈ V (G), is called a signed total Roman k-dominating family...

Let D be a finite and simple digraph with vertex set V (D). A signed total Roman dominating function (STRDF) on a digraph D is a function f : V (D) → {−1, 1, 2} satisfying the conditions that (i) ∑x∈N−(v) f(x) ≥ 1 for each v ∈ V (D), where N−(v) consists of all vertices of D from which arcs go into v, and (ii) every vertex u for which f(u) = −1 has an inner neighbor v for which f(v) = 2. The weight of an STRDF f is w(f) = ∑v∈V (D) f(v). The signed total Roman domination number γstR(D) of D is the...

A perfect independent set $I$ of a graph $G$ is defined to be an independent set with the property that any vertex not in $I$ has at least two neighbors in $I$. For a nonnegative integer $k$, a subset $I$ of the vertex set $V\left(G\right)$ of a graph $G$ is said to be $k$-independent, if $I$ is independent and every independent subset $I^{\text{'}}$ of $G$ with $|I^{\text{'}}|\ge |I|-(k-1)$ is a subset of $I$. A set $I$ of vertices of $G$ is a super $k$-independent set of $G$ if $I$ is $k$-independent in the graph $G[I,V(G)-I]$, where $G[I,V(G)-I]$ is the bipartite graph obtained from $G$ by deleting all edges...

Let ir(G) and γ(G) be the irredundance number and domination number of a graph G, respectively. The number of vertices and leaves of a graph G are denoted by n(G) and n₁(G). If T is a tree, then Lemańska [4] presented in 2004 the sharp lower bound γ(T) ≥ (n(T) + 2 - n₁(T))/3. In this paper we prove ir(T) ≥ (n(T) + 2 - n₁(T))/3. for an arbitrary tree T. Since γ(T) ≥ ir(T) is always valid, this inequality is an extension and improvement of Lemańska's result. ...

Let G be a simple graph, and let p be a positive integer. A subset D ⊆ V(G) is a p-dominating set of the graph G, if every vertex v ∈ V(G)-D is adjacent with at least p vertices of D. The p-domination number γₚ(G) is the minimum cardinality among the p-dominating sets of G. Note that the 1-domination number γ₁(G) is the usual domination number γ(G). If G is a nontrivial connected block graph, then we show that γ₂(G) ≥ γ(G)+1, and we characterize all connected block graphs with...

Let G = (V(G),E(G)) be a simple graph, and let k be a positive integer. A subset D of V(G) is a k-dominating set if every vertex of V(G) - D is dominated at least k times by D. The k-domination number γₖ(G) is the minimum cardinality of a k-dominating set of G. In [5] Volkmann showed that for every nontrivial tree T, γ₂(T) ≥ γ₁(T)+1 and characterized extremal trees attaining this bound. In this paper we characterize all trees T with γ₂(T) = γ₁(T)+2.

Let $k$ be a positive integer, and let $G$ be a simple graph with vertex set $V\left(G\right)$. A of the graph $G$ is a subset $D$ of $V\left(G\right)$ such that every vertex of $V\left(G\right)-D$ is adjacent to at least $k$ vertices in $D$. A of $G$ is a partition of $V\left(G\right)$ into $k$-dominating sets. The maximum number of dominating sets in a $k$-domatic partition of $G$ is called the $d_k\left(G\right)$. In this paper, we present upper and lower bounds for the $k$-domatic number, and we establish Nordhaus-Gaddum-type results. Some of our results extend those for the classical...

If $x$ is a vertex of a digraph $D$, then we denote by $d^{+}\left(x\right)$ and $d^{-}\left(x\right)$ the outdegree and the indegree of $x$, respectively. A digraph $D$ is called regular, if there is a number $p\in \mathbb{N}$ such that $d^{+}\left(x\right)=d^{-}\left(x\right)=p$ for all vertices $x$ of $D$. A $c$-partite tournament is an orientation of a complete $c$-partite graph. There are many results about directed cycles of a given length or of directed cycles with vertices from a given number of partite sets. The idea is now to combine the two properties. In this article, we examine in particular, whether...

A graph $G$ is a $\{d,d+k\}$-graph, if one vertex has degree $d+k$ and the remaining vertices of $G$ have degree $d$. In the special case of $k=0$, the graph $G$ is $d$-regular. Let $k,p\ge 0$ and $d,n\ge 1$ be integers such that $n$ and $p$ are of the same parity. If $G$ is a connected $\{d,d+k\}$-graph of order $n$ without a matching $M$ of size $2\left|M\right|=n-p$, then we show in this paper the following: If $d=2$, then $k\ge 2(p+2)$ and (i) $n\ge k+p+6$. If $d\ge 3$ is odd and $t$ an integer with $1\le t\le p+2$, then (ii) $n\ge d+k+1$ for $k\ge d(p+2)$, (iii) $n\ge d(p+3)+2t+1$ for $d(p+2-t)+t\le k\le d(p+3-t)+t-3$, (iv) $n\ge d(p+3)+2p+7$ for $k\le p$. If $d\ge 4$ is even, then (v) $n\ge d+k+2-\eta$ for $k\ge d(p+3)+p+4+\eta$, (vi) $n\ge d+k+p+2-2t=d(p+4)+p+6$ for $k=d(p+3)+4+2t$ and $p\ge 1$, (vii) $n\ge d+k+p+4$ for...