The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

Currently displaying 1 – 5 of 5

Showing per page

Order by Relevance | Title | Year of publication

Automata, algebraicity and distribution of sequences of powers

Jean-Paul AlloucheJean-Marc DeshouillersTeturo KamaeTadahiro Koyanagi — 2001

Annales de l’institut Fourier

Let K be a finite field of characteristic p . Let K ( ( x ) ) be the field of formal Laurent series f ( x ) in x with coefficients in K . That is, f ( x ) = n = n 0 f n x n with n 0 𝐙 and f n K ( n = n 0 , n 0 + 1 , ) . We discuss the distribution of ( { f m } ) m = 0 , 1 , 2 , for f K ( ( x ) ) , where { f } : = n = 0 f n x n K [ [ x ] ] denotes the nonnegative part of f K ( ( x ) ) . This is a little different from the real number case where the fractional part that excludes constant term (digit of order 0) is considered. We give an alternative proof of a result by De Mathan obtaining the generic distribution...

Page 1

Download Results (CSV)