The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
Associated with every vector measure m taking its values in a Fréchet space X is the space L(m) of all m-integrable functions. It turns out that L(m) is always a Fréchet lattice. We show that possession of the AL-property for the lattice L(m) has some remarkable consequences for both the underlying Fréchet space X and the integration operator f → ∫ f dm.
The spaces L¹(m) of all m-integrable (resp. of all scalarly m-integrable) functions for a vector measure m, taking values in a complex locally convex Hausdorff space X (briefly, lcHs), are themselves lcHs for the mean convergence topology. Additionally, is always a complex vector lattice; this is not necessarily so for L¹(m). To identify precisely when L¹(m) is also a complex vector lattice is one of our central aims. Whenever X is sequentially complete, then this is the case. If, additionally,...
A characterization is given of those Banach-space-valued vector measures m with finite variation whose associated integration operator Iₘ: f ↦ ∫fdm is compact as a linear map from L¹(m) into the Banach space. Moreover, in every infinite-dimensional Banach space there exist nontrivial vector measures m (with finite variation) such that Iₘ is compact, and other m (still with finite variation) such that Iₘ is not compact. If m has infinite variation, then Iₘ is never compact.
Complete and σ-complete Boolean algebras of projections acting in a Banach space were introduced by W. Bade in the 1950's. A basic fact is that every complete Boolean algebra of projections is necessarily a closed set for the strong operator topology. Here we address the analogous question for σ-complete Boolean algebras: are they always a sequentially closed set for the strong operator topology? For the atomic case the answer is shown to be affirmative. For the general case, we develop criteria...
CONTENTSIntroduction...............................................................................51. Preliminaries.........................................................................72. Relative weak compactness of the range............................133. Closed spectral measures...................................................164. Spectral measures and B.a.'s of projections........................22References..............................................................................45...
CONTENTS
Preface.........................................................................................................5
1. Introduction...............................................................................................6
1.1. Measurability and vector measures.....................................................6
1.2. Convolution and vector measures.....................................................12
...
Download Results (CSV)