Experimental evaluation of a multiobjective linear programming software
D. K. Despotis, Y. Siskos, D. Yannacopoulos (1991)
RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle
Similarity:
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
D. K. Despotis, Y. Siskos, D. Yannacopoulos (1991)
RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle
Similarity:
B. Roy, R. Slowinski (1993)
RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle
Similarity:
Milani, A.S., Shanian, A., El-Lahham, C. (2006)
Journal of Applied Mathematics and Decision Sciences
Similarity:
William V. Gehrlein (1981)
RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle
Similarity:
Gheorghe Păun (1984)
RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle
Similarity:
William V. Gehrlein (1980)
RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle
Similarity:
D. de Werra (1987)
RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle
Similarity:
N. K. Kwak, Michael D. Renfro (1989)
RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle
Similarity:
Félix Mora-Camino (1983)
RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle
Similarity:
H. P. Young (1990)
Mathématiques et Sciences Humaines
Similarity:
Condorcet believed that the purpose of voting is to make a choice that is “best” for society. According to his view, there is one choice that is objectively best, another that is second-best, and so forth. Unfortunately, voters sometimes make mistakes ; they misperceive what is best. In designing a voting rule, therefore, the objective should be to choose the alternative that is most likely to be best. Condorcet solved this problem using a form of maximum likelihood estimation. The procedure...