On the General Motion-Planning Problem with Two Degrees of Freedom.
L.J. Guibas, Sharir Micha, Shmuel Sifrony (1989)
Discrete & computational geometry
Similarity:
L.J. Guibas, Sharir Micha, Shmuel Sifrony (1989)
Discrete & computational geometry
Similarity:
H. Edelsbrunner, Raimund Seidel, Micha Sharir, Richard Pollack, Janos Pach, Leonidas Guibas, John Hershberger, Jack Snoeyink (1989)
Discrete & computational geometry
Similarity:
R. Kopperman, P.R. Meyer, R.G. Wilson (1991)
Discrete & computational geometry
Similarity:
He Yuan, Liangyun Chen (2016)
Colloquium Mathematicae
Similarity:
We study Jordan (θ,θ)-superderivations and Jordan triple (θ,θ)-superderivations of superalgebras, using the theory of functional identities in superalgebras. As a consequence, we prove that if A = A₀ ⊕ A₁ is a prime superalgebra with deg(A₁) ≥ 9, then Jordan superderivations and Jordan triple superderivations of A are superderivations of A, and generalized Jordan superderivations and generalized Jordan triple superderivations of A are generalized superderivations of A.
Sara Shafiq, Muhammad Aslam (2017)
Open Mathematics
Similarity:
In this paper, the notions of Jordan homomorphism and Jordan derivation of inverse semirings are introduced. A few results of Herstein and Brešar on Jordan homomorphisms and Jordan derivations of rings are generalized in the setting of inverse semirings.
J. Harkness (1893/94)
Bulletin of the New York Mathematical Society
Similarity:
A. Moreno Galindo (1997)
Studia Mathematica
Similarity:
For = ℝ or ℂ we exhibit a Jordan-algebra norm ⎮·⎮ on the simple associative algebra with the property that Jordan polynomials over are precisely those associative polynomials over which act ⎮·⎮-continuously on . This analytic determination of Jordan polynomials improves the one recently obtained in [5].
Eberhard Neher (1979)
Mathematische Zeitschrift
Similarity:
Lotfi Riahi (2004)
Colloquium Mathematicae
Similarity:
We prove a new 3G-Theorem for the Laplace Green function G on an arbitrary Jordan domain D in ℝ². This theorem extends the recent one proved on a Dini-smooth Jordan domain.
Antonio Fernández López (1998)
Manuscripta mathematica
Similarity:
Dilian Yang (2005)
Colloquium Mathematicae
Similarity:
Motivated by Problem 2 in [2], Jordan *-derivation pairs and n-Jordan *-mappings are studied. From the results on these mappings, an affirmative answer to Problem 2 in [2] is given when E = F in (1) or when 𝓐 is unital. For the general case, we prove that every Jordan *-derivation pair is automatically real-linear. Furthermore, a characterization of a non-normal prime *-ring under some mild assumptions and a representation theorem for quasi-quadratic functionals are provided. ...
Abbas Najati (2010)
Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal
Similarity:
Under some conditions we prove that every generalized Jordan triple derivation on a Lie triple system is a generalized derivation. Specially, we conclude that every Jordan triple -derivation on a Lie triple system is a -derivation.
Fangyan Lu (2009)
Studia Mathematica
Similarity:
We show that every Jordan isomorphism between CSL algebras is the sum of an isomorphism and an anti-isomorphism. Also we show that each Jordan derivation of a CSL algebra is a derivation.
Holger P. Petersson, M.L. Racine (1983)
Manuscripta mathematica
Similarity: