Automated theorem proving in monadic predicate calculus
Jan Štěpán (1991)
Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis. Facultas Rerum Naturalium. Mathematica
Similarity:
Jan Štěpán (1991)
Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis. Facultas Rerum Naturalium. Mathematica
Similarity:
Alexandros Pefku (2001)
The Teaching of Mathematics
Similarity:
Marcello D'Agostino, Dov M. Gabbay, Alessandra Russo (1996)
Mathware and Soft Computing
Similarity:
We investigate the logical systems which result from introducing the modalities L and M into the family of substructural implication logics (including relevant, linear and intuitionistic implication). Our results lead to the formulation of a uniform labelled refutation system for these logics.
Dorota Leszczyńska-Jasion, Yaroslav Petrukhin, Vasilyi Shangin (2019)
Bulletin of the Section of Logic
Similarity:
The goal of this paper is to propose correspondence analysis as a technique for generating the so-called erotetic (i.e. pertaining to the logic of questions) calculi which constitute the method of Socratic proofs by Andrzej Wiśniewski. As we explain in the paper, in order to successfully design an erotetic calculus one needs invertible sequent-calculus-style rules. For this reason, the proposed correspondence analysis resulting in invertible rules can constitute a new foundation for...
Mirjana Ilić (2016)
Bulletin of the Section of Logic
Similarity:
A natural deduction system NI, for the full propositional intuitionistic logic, is proposed. The operational rules of NI are obtained by the translation from Gentzen’s calculus LJ and the normalization is proved, via translations from sequent calculus derivations to natural deduction derivations and back.
Andrzej Indrzejczak (2018)
Bulletin of the Section of Logic
Similarity:
In several applications of sequent calculi going beyond pure logic, an introduction of suitably defined rules seems to be more profitable than addition of extra axiomatic sequents. A program of formalization of mathematical theories via rules of special sort was developed successfully by Negri and von Plato. In this paper a general theorem on possible ways of transforming axiomatic sequents into rules in sequent calculi is proved. We discuss its possible applications and provide some...
G. Rousseau (1970)
Fundamenta Mathematicae
Similarity:
Prešić, Slaviša B. (1997)
Publications de l'Institut Mathématique. Nouvelle Série
Similarity:
Javier Legris, Jorge A. Molina (2001)
Philosophia Scientiae
Similarity:
In this paper we analyze the consideration of intuitionistic logic as an extension of classical logic. This — at first sight surprising — point of view has been sustained explicitly by Jan Łukasiewicz on the basis of a mapping of classical propositional logic into intuitionistic propositional logic by Kurt Gödel in 1933. Simultaneously with Gödel, Gerhard Gentzen had proposed another mapping of Peano´s arithmetic into Heyting´s arithmetic. We shall discuss these mappings in connection...
Michael Franssen, Harrie De Swart (2004)
RACSAM
Similarity:
Cocktail is a tool for deriving correct programs from their specifications. The present version is powerful enough for educational purposes. The tool yields support for many sorted first order predicate logic, formulated in a pure type system with parametric constants (CPTS), as the specification language, a simple While-language, a Hoare logic represented in the same CPTS for deriving programs from their specifications and a simple tableau based automated theorem prover for verifying...
Slobodan Vujošević (2012)
Review of the National Center for Digitization
Similarity:
Mitio Takano (2019)
Bulletin of the Section of Logic
Similarity:
The modal logic S4.2 is S4 with the additional axiom ◊□A ⊃ □◊A. In this article, the sequent calculus GS4.2 for this logic is presented, and by imposing an appropriate restriction on the application of the cut-rule, it is shown that, every GS4.2-provable sequent S has a GS4.2-proof such that every formula occurring in it is either a subformula of some formula in S, or the formula □¬□B or ¬□B, where □B occurs in the scope of some occurrence of □ in some formula of S. These are just the...