The separation axioms
J. Guia (1986)
Matematički Vesnik
Similarity:
J. Guia (1986)
Matematički Vesnik
Similarity:
M. Jelić (1989)
Matematički Vesnik
Similarity:
Marianne Morillon (2017)
Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae
Similarity:
In set theory without the Axiom of Choice ZF, we prove that for every commutative field , the following statement : “On every non null -vector space, there exists a non null linear form” implies the existence of a “-linear extender” on every vector subspace of a -vector space. This solves a question raised in Morillon M., Linear forms and axioms of choice, Comment. Math. Univ. Carolin. 50 (2009), no. 3, 421-431. In the second part of the paper, we generalize our results in the case...
G. Ervynck (1991)
Matematički Vesnik
Similarity:
Jorge Picado, Aleš Pultr (2019)
Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae
Similarity:
More precisely, we are analyzing some of H. Simmons, S. B. Niefield and K. I. Rosenthal results concerning sublocales induced by subspaces. H. Simmons was concerned with the question when the coframe of sublocales is Boolean; he recognized the role of the axiom for the relation of certain degrees of scatteredness but did not emphasize its role in the relation between sublocales and subspaces. S. B. Niefield and K. I. Rosenthal just mention this axiom in a remark about Simmons’ result....
Ioannis Souldatos (2013)
Fundamenta Mathematicae
Similarity:
This paper is part II of a study on cardinals that are characterizable by a Scott sentence, continuing previous work of the author. A cardinal κ is characterized by a Scott sentence if has a model of size κ, but no model of size κ⁺. The main question in this paper is the following: Are the characterizable cardinals closed under the powerset operation? We prove that if is characterized by a Scott sentence, then is (homogeneously) characterized by a Scott sentence, for all 0 <...
Richard Gostanian, Karel Hrbacek
Similarity:
CONTENTS0. Preliminaries....................................................................... 71. Adding propositional connectives to ............... 82. The propositional part of (S)............................. 103. The operation S and the Boolean algebra ............... 114. General model-theoretic properties of (S)...... 175. Hanf number computations...................................................... 226. Negative results for (S)...........................................
Eleftherios Tachtsis (2010)
Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences. Mathematics
Similarity:
We work in ZF set theory (i.e., Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory minus the Axiom of Choice AC) and show the following: 1. The Axiom of Choice for well-ordered families of non-empty sets () does not imply “the Tychonoff product , where 2 is the discrete space 0,1, is countably compact” in ZF. This answers in the negative the following question from Keremedis, Felouzis, and Tachtsis [Bull. Polish Acad. Sci. Math. 55 (2007)]: Does the Countable Axiom of Choice for families of non-empty sets...
James H. Schmerl (1976)
Colloquium Mathematicae
Similarity:
Krzysztof Ciesielski, Janusz Pawlikowski (2003)
Fundamenta Mathematicae
Similarity:
We formulate a Covering Property Axiom , which holds in the iterated perfect set model, and show that it implies easily the following facts. (a) For every S ⊂ ℝ of cardinality continuum there exists a uniformly continuous function g: ℝ → ℝ with g[S] = [0,1]. (b) If S ⊂ ℝ is either perfectly meager or universally null then S has cardinality less than . (c) cof() = ω₁ < , i.e., the cofinality of the measure ideal is ω₁. (d) For every uniformly bounded sequence of Borel functions...
J. Guia (1984)
Matematički Vesnik
Similarity:
Malgorzata Wójcicka (1986)
Colloquium Mathematicae
Similarity:
Athanassios Tzouvaras (2004)
Fundamenta Mathematicae
Similarity:
We show that uncountable cardinals are indistinguishable by sentences of the monadic second-order language of order of the form (∀X)ϕ(X) and (∃X)ϕ(X), for ϕ positive in X and containing no set-quantifiers, when the set variables range over large (= cofinal) subsets of the cardinals. This strengthens the result of Doner-Mostowski-Tarski [3] that (κ,∈), (λ,∈) are elementarily equivalent when κ, λ are uncountable. It follows that we can consistently postulate that the structures , are...
Paul Corazza (2003)
Fundamenta Mathematicae
Similarity:
∃κI₃(κ) is the assertion that there is an elementary embedding with critical point below λ, and with λ a limit. The Wholeness Axiom, or WA, asserts that there is a nontrivial elementary embedding j: V → V; WA is formulated in the language ∈,j and has as axioms an Elementarity schema, which asserts that j is elementary; a Critical Point axiom, which asserts that there is a least ordinal moved by j; and includes every instance of the Separation schema for j-formulas. Because no instance...
G. Kreisel, G. Takeuti
Similarity:
CONTENTSIntroduction............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 5 I. Results on self-referential propositions............................................................................................................................. 11 1. Definitions of some principal metamathematical notions......................................................................
Rogério Augusto dos Santos Fajardo (2010)
Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences. Mathematics
Similarity:
We construct, under Axiom ♢, a family of indecomposable Banach spaces with few operators such that every operator from into is weakly compact, for all ξ ≠ η. In particular, these spaces are pairwise essentially incomparable. Assuming no additional set-theoretic axiom, we obtain this result with size instead of .
Andrzej Nowik (2002)
Colloquium Mathematicae
Similarity:
We show that under the axiom there is no uniformly completely Ramsey null set of size . In particular, this holds in the iterated perfect set model. This answers a question of U. Darji.
Zygmunt Ratajczyk
Similarity:
CONTENTS0. Introduction.......................................................................... 51. Preliminaries............................................................................... 72. Basic facts to be used in the sequel....................................... 113. Predicates OD(.,.) and CL(.,.).................................................... 174. Predicate Sels............................................................................. 185. Strong -collection...........................................................
Gryzlov, A.
Similarity: